<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple-VRF over PPP in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561419#M151970</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Samuel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; it was told me that MPLS over PPP is not supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tested MPLS over PPP and over ML PPP on serial interfaces without problems, also for ML PPP over ATM this should be possible there were some examples in the forums.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need special care of MTU issues, like it happens in some DSL remote offices using PPPoE you may need to reduce MTU on LAN interfaces to be sure to avoid MTU issues on the MPLS enabled link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-10T19:19:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple-VRF over PPP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561418#M151969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for a solution for the following problem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a PE router, containing multiple VRF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An CE router is linked to this PE router via ATM-interfaces and is running MLPPP for bundling the lines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, the CE router should be able to access 2 different VRF's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea how to solve this? My first idea was to enable MPLS, however, it was told me that MPLS over PPP is not supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561418#M151969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel De Wever</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-04T18:25:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple-VRF over PPP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561419#M151970</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Samuel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; it was told me that MPLS over PPP is not supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tested MPLS over PPP and over ML PPP on serial interfaces without problems, also for ML PPP over ATM this should be possible there were some examples in the forums.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need special care of MTU issues, like it happens in some DSL remote offices using PPPoE you may need to reduce MTU on LAN interfaces to be sure to avoid MTU issues on the MPLS enabled link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561419#M151970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T19:19:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple-VRF over PPP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561420#M151971</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to add mpls ip to an Cisco 3725 on the Dialer interface and it looks te be working. the only strange thing is that when I also add mpls ip on the other side (the Cisco 7200 - PE router) is not working anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I tried the same thing on the Cisco 1841 and Cisco 2621XM and their its not working at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you give me an example config since I was not able to find it in the forum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561420#M151971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel De Wever</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-12T08:00:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple-VRF over PPP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561421#M151972</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I little bit more information about my configs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PE router: (7200 - running 12.4-24T)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Virtual-Template1&lt;BR /&gt; ip unnumbered Loopback0&lt;BR /&gt; ip load-sharing per-packet&lt;BR /&gt; mpls ip&lt;BR /&gt; peer default ip address pool default&lt;BR /&gt; keepalive 2&lt;BR /&gt; ppp mtu adaptive&lt;BR /&gt; ppp authentication pap&lt;BR /&gt; ppp multilink&lt;BR /&gt; ppp multilink links minimum 1&lt;BR /&gt; ppp multilink fragment maximum 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; pppoe enable group global&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bba-group pppoe global&lt;BR /&gt; virtual-template 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CE router: (3725 - running 12.4-15.T14)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ATM0/0&lt;BR /&gt; no ip address&lt;BR /&gt; no atm ilmi-keepalive&lt;BR /&gt; pvc 8/35&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; encapsulation aal5snap&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; pppoe-client dial-pool-number 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Dialer1&lt;BR /&gt; ip address negotiated&lt;BR /&gt; encapsulation ppp&lt;BR /&gt; dialer pool 2&lt;BR /&gt; dialer-group 2&lt;BR /&gt; mpls ip&lt;BR /&gt; ppp authentication pap callin&lt;BR /&gt; ppp pap sent-username ******* password 0 *********&lt;BR /&gt; ppp multilink&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mpls ldp router-id Dialer1 force&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router#sh pppoe session&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:04.931: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/1, changed state to up&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1 client session&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Uniq ID&amp;nbsp; PPPoE&amp;nbsp; RemMAC&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Port&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VT&amp;nbsp; VA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; State&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SID&amp;nbsp; LocMAC&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VA-st&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N/A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 186&amp;nbsp; 0030.f2f0.8c19&amp;nbsp; ATM0/0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Di1&amp;nbsp; Vi2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; UP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0014.a9dd.09b0&amp;nbsp; VC:&amp;nbsp; 8/35&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; UP&lt;BR /&gt;Router#&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have enabled debug mpls packets on the CE, when I ping the device from the PE, I see the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:14.215: MPLS: Di1: recvd: CoS=6, TTL=255, Label(s)=18&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:14.215: MPLS: Di1: xmit: (no label)&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:14.215: MPLS: Di1: recvd: CoS=6, TTL=255, Label(s)=18&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:14.215: MPLS: Di1: xmit: (no label)&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:16.243: MPLS: Di1: recvd: CoS=6, TTL=255, Label(s)=18&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:16.243: MPLS: Di1: xmit: (no label)&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:17.195: MPLS: Di1: recvd: CoS=0, TTL=255, Label(s)=18&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:17.195: MPLS: Di1: xmit: (no label)&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:20.195: MPLS: Di1: recvd: CoS=0, TTL=255, Label(s)=18&lt;BR /&gt;*Jul 24 09:33:20.195: MPLS: Di1: xmit: (no label)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks packets are arriving right labeled, but no packets are send out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea what I am doing wrong?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:48:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561421#M151972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel De Wever</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-12T20:48:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple-VRF over PPP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561422#M151973</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Samuel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sorry for late answer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mpls ldp router-id Dialer1 force&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would say you need to use a loopback as router-id and not the dialer interface that has a dynamic negotiated address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:55:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561422#M151973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-16T11:55:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple-VRF over PPP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561423#M151974</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since we are always giving the same IP adres via PPPoE, I don't see the reason why it would not work with Dailer1 as router-id ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It keep strange for me that the Cisco 3725 is arriving the mpls labelled packets but not sending anything back.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other idea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/multiple-vrf-over-ppp/m-p/1561423#M151974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel De Wever</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-19T18:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

