<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic service-policy output issue in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103659#M205588</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i had assumed this may be the case but can you provide any supporting documentation or link to some so that i can use it to proceed with upgrading the devices?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Angelo ANELLO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-30T05:24:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>service-policy output issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103657#M205586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&amp;nbsp; we have recently applied some QoS on our remote routers in a bid to improve performance and connectivity, however, every so often and randomly, the "&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;service-poicy output&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;policy-map&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;" command is automatically removed from the WAN interface and we are not sure why.&amp;nbsp; we then have to reapply the policy in order to have it available again.&amp;nbsp; this happens to infrequently and on different devices for us to fidn a root cause.&amp;nbsp; The routers are model 881 and run firmware from ver 12.2 - 12.4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is our current policy on the remote routers:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map match-any Citrix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match access-group name Citrix-ACL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map WAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; class Citrix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; priority percent 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; set dscp af41&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; class class-default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; bandwidth remaining percent 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; random-detect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map Global&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; class class-default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; shape average ##4096000## (value based on link speed)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; service-policy WAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip access-list extended Citrix-ACL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; permit tcp any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq 1494&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; permit udp any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq 2598&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int WAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; service-policy output Global&amp;nbsp; (THIS IS THE COMMAND THAT KEEPS DROPPING OFF)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 02:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103657#M205586</guid>
      <dc:creator>Angelo ANELLO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T02:53:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>service-policy output issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103658#M205587</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Update IOS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103658#M205587</guid>
      <dc:creator>paolo bevilacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T04:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>service-policy output issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103659#M205588</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i had assumed this may be the case but can you provide any supporting documentation or link to some so that i can use it to proceed with upgrading the devices?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103659#M205588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Angelo ANELLO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T05:24:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: service-policy output issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103660#M205589</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The&amp;nbsp; Author of this posting offers the information contained within this&amp;nbsp; posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that&amp;nbsp; there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.&amp;nbsp; Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not&amp;nbsp; be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this&amp;nbsp; posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Liability Disclaimer&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;In&amp;nbsp; no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,&amp;nbsp; without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out&amp;nbsp; of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author&amp;nbsp; has been advised of the possibility of such damage.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Posting&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I don't have a specific bug or release note, but like Paolo, often issues like this are resolved in later IOSs.&amp;nbsp; BTW, this doesn't mean you need a version upgrade, for example, to upgrade from 12.2 to 12.4, sometimes moving to the latest patch release or newer point release will solve the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a generalization, the older IOS versions (12.2?) that supported mainline GD tagged releases, choosing the last GD tagged release is often a good bet.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103660#M205589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph W. Doherty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T10:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>service-policy output issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103661#M205590</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i will try this and continue to monitor the routers for any further issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;once confirmed i can close this request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 01:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/service-policy-output-issue/m-p/2103661#M205590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Angelo ANELLO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-05T01:14:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

