<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298908#M221280</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guibarati,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I'm using eBGP. Yes, the GRE is the backup. I would like instant failover but, maybe that isn't safe? I have my timers set now for 15 45. How quick can I go? Also, after the primary WAN circuit has come back, I would like to wait a certain amount of time before going back to the primary WAN circuit. Do you think an SLA and tracking and an EEM script would be the best way to accomplish this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Pat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-05T19:16:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298904#M221276</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;been labing a backup solution using a GRE VPN link. The primary connection is a&amp;nbsp; BGP Link. See attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was hoping someon could explain the behavior I'm seeing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a constant ping going from the HQ Site to the Remote sites loopback amd the Remote site to the HQs loopback..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The HQ router and the Remote Site router are using the BGP routes initially. When I shut the interface facing the Remote Site on the BGP WAN Provider router, the Remote site only drops one ping but, the HQ site ping fails for about 30 seconds and then picks up after it gets the EIGRP route to the Remote Site over the GRE tunnel. Is this normal behavior as it has to wait for the BGP route to time out?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, when I bring the interface back up on the BGP WAN Provider, the BGP routes don't come back. I have to manually do a clear ip eigrp neighbor on the Remote Site Router or the HQ router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Pat.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 04:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298904#M221276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T04:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298905#M221277</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 30 seconds delay is normal. When you shut the interface the local router immediatly shuts the bgp peer based on the default command "bgp fast-external-fallover". The other end will wait for the hold time to expire before considering the other end down (you can change it with "timers bgp &lt;KEEPALIVE&gt; &lt;HOLD time=""&gt;"&lt;/HOLD&gt;&lt;/KEEPALIVE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bgp route not comming back depends on your config. Is it iBGP or eBGP peer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is the GRE been considered as backup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:06:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298905#M221277</guid>
      <dc:creator>guibarati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T18:06:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298906#M221278</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The&amp;nbsp; Author of this posting offers the information contained within this&amp;nbsp; posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that&amp;nbsp; there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.&amp;nbsp; Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not&amp;nbsp; be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this&amp;nbsp; posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Liability Disclaimer&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;In&amp;nbsp; no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,&amp;nbsp; without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out&amp;nbsp; of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author&amp;nbsp; has been advised of the possibility of such damage.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Posting&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might also consider enabling keepalives across the GRE tunnel.&amp;nbsp; (I often use keepalive 1.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298906#M221278</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph W. Doherty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T18:11:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298907#M221279</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIGRP is a preferred protocol on Cisco routers and its learned routes will be preferred over BGP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298907#M221279</guid>
      <dc:creator>rais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T18:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298908#M221280</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guibarati,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I'm using eBGP. Yes, the GRE is the backup. I would like instant failover but, maybe that isn't safe? I have my timers set now for 15 45. How quick can I go? Also, after the primary WAN circuit has come back, I would like to wait a certain amount of time before going back to the primary WAN circuit. Do you think an SLA and tracking and an EEM script would be the best way to accomplish this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Pat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298908#M221280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T19:16:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298909#M221281</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Joseph,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using 3 2 at the moment. Using 1 won't buy me much will it? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:21:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298909#M221281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T19:21:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298910#M221282</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Rais,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;correct me if I'm wrong but, I believe eBGP would be preferred over EIGRP. eBGP cost is 20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Pat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:24:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298910#M221282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T19:24:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298911#M221283</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct. But EIGRP summary is preferred over eBGP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:25:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298911#M221283</guid>
      <dc:creator>rais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T19:25:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298912#M221284</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For waiting when the link is back you need to use "dampening" on BGP neigboor. That's the best and correct way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instant (almost) failover we need other information, what is your "update-source" on the BGP peers, and how the routers know the destination neighbor address?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298912#M221284</guid>
      <dc:creator>guibarati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T19:31:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298913#M221285</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Guibarati,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Update Source? Can't remember if I configured one as I'm at work and not at my home desktop.I'll look tonight.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure I follow your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298913#M221285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T20:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298914#M221286</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can use the following: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;neighbor &lt;IP&gt; &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;fall-over&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/IP&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;IF IGP looses route for the BGP peer, bgp immediatly bring the peer down. In this case you would need an IGP to reach eachother BGP peer IP address.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:13:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298914#M221286</guid>
      <dc:creator>guibarati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T20:13:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298915#M221287</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks Guibarati,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you mean "neighbor &lt;IP&gt; fall-over" or "neighbor &lt;IP&gt; &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;fail&lt;/SPAN&gt;-over?&lt;/IP&gt;&lt;/IP&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"IF IGP looses route for the BGP peer, bgp immediatly bring the peer down. In this case you would need an IGP to reach eachother BGP peer IP address."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't follow this sentence. Could you please clarify?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:34:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298915#M221287</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-05T20:34:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298916#M221288</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Author of this posting offers the information contained within this&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of&amp;nbsp; this&amp;nbsp; posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Liability Disclaimer&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;In&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising&amp;nbsp; out&amp;nbsp; of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if&amp;nbsp; Author&amp;nbsp; has been advised of the possibility of such damage.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Posting&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; No, not a whole lot.&amp;nbsp; It should take link down in 3 seconds rather than your 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298916#M221288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph W. Doherty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-06T00:54:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298917#M221289</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good blog about fall-over&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://blog.zakir.net/index.php?/archives/22-BGP-Fast-Peering-Session-Deactivation-neighbor-fall-over.html"&gt;http://blog.zakir.net/index.php?/archives/22-BGP-Fast-Peering-Session-Deactivation-neighbor-fall-over.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 01:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298917#M221289</guid>
      <dc:creator>muca</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-06T01:56:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298918#M221290</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Muca.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How would I configure this on the ebgp routers HQ and Remote Site that aren't directly connected - from the network in the diagram?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298918#M221290</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick McHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-06T15:31:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GRE VPN as Backup Link Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298919#M221291</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Patrick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not the most experienced guy with bgp but have a look at the following documents. I think it will help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that&amp;nbsp; :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the "neighbor fall-over” command neighbors don't need to be directly connected&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-32611" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“Bgp Fast-external-failover”&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; relies only on directly connected neighbor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-34525"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-34525&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-32611"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-32611&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 02:49:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/gre-vpn-as-backup-link-issue/m-p/2298919#M221291</guid>
      <dc:creator>muca</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-07T02:49:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

