<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312414#M222343</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure what I'm even looking to do can even be done but here's the scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router A advertises a default route to all ospf nodes with the "default-information-originate always" command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router B connects to router A and to Router D &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router C connects to router A and to Router D&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router D has many networks advertised but we will say these are the pertinent ones:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network 1 - 192.168.10.0/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network 2 - 192.168.11.0/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And as previously mentioned, Router D has a connection to Router B and C on their own indivudual link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All routers are part of the same area. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to make it so that router A, see's Network 1 and prefers the path through Router B instead of Router C, and that Network 2 has a prefered path through Router C instead of B while also having default traffic take the same path it came from?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this were EIGRP, I would easily make a distribute list for each of the interfaces on Router D that connect to B and C but distribute lists won't work in OSPF, is there an alternative?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 05:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rwharris13</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-05T05:22:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312414#M222343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure what I'm even looking to do can even be done but here's the scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router A advertises a default route to all ospf nodes with the "default-information-originate always" command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router B connects to router A and to Router D &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router C connects to router A and to Router D&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router D has many networks advertised but we will say these are the pertinent ones:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network 1 - 192.168.10.0/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network 2 - 192.168.11.0/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And as previously mentioned, Router D has a connection to Router B and C on their own indivudual link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All routers are part of the same area. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to make it so that router A, see's Network 1 and prefers the path through Router B instead of Router C, and that Network 2 has a prefered path through Router C instead of B while also having default traffic take the same path it came from?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this were EIGRP, I would easily make a distribute list for each of the interfaces on Router D that connect to B and C but distribute lists won't work in OSPF, is there an alternative?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 05:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312414#M222343</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwharris13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T05:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312415#M222344</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;May be this link will help:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/routmap.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/routmap.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, &lt;BR /&gt;Alex. &lt;BR /&gt;Please rate useful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312415#M222344</guid>
      <dc:creator>acampbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-21T23:48:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312416#M222345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Hello Ron,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Hope your doing well,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;First i would&amp;nbsp; like to tell you that OSPF doesn't support unequal load balancing like&amp;nbsp; eigrp does so it is difficult to do prefix link load balancing with&amp;nbsp; using cost.In your case if all of your link are having same bandwidth&amp;nbsp; you might be having 2 equal cost for each network i.e for net1 and&amp;nbsp; net2.rest of packet forwarding is done on data plane that is your cef is&amp;nbsp; doing packet forwarding depending on per destination/per packet.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;You can verify your packet forwarding for specific subnet using this command and check on which interface packets going &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;sh ip cef 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.252&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;sh ip cef exact-route &lt;SOURCE-PREFIX&gt; &lt;DESTINATION-PREFIX&gt;&lt;/DESTINATION-PREFIX&gt;&lt;/SOURCE-PREFIX&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;In your case you can use policy-base routing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;for net 1 you match in Access-list and set next hop of router B and for net 2 you can use normal routing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Here is doc link for PBR&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1634"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1634&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Hope it helps &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;Ashish &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312416#M222345</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashirkar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-22T07:39:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312417#M222346</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One way is to go as Ashish suggest of PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another way is to use of Distribute list and Distribute list work very well with OSPF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Distribute-list prevent route getting installed in routing table, they would be there in topology table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably, you can share your config with distribute-list which you&amp;nbsp; tried, so that we can figure out whats missing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Smitesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312417#M222346</guid>
      <dc:creator>smitesh kharecha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-22T08:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312418#M222347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried simulating it in LAB..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you check below config and output to verify, is this what you wanted...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Route Table before Distribute-list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;R1#sh ip ro ospf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2.2.2.0 [110/2] via 10.10.12.2, 00:02:04, FastEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.3.3.0 [110/2] via 10.10.13.3, 00:01:35, FastEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0 [110/3] via 10.10.13.3, 00:00:13, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; [110/3] via 10.10.12.2, 00:00:13, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.11.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.11.0 [110/3] via 10.10.13.3, 00:00:03, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; [110/3] via 10.10.12.2, 00:00:03, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.10.24.0 [110/2] via 10.10.12.2, 00:02:04, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.10.34.0 [110/2] via 10.10.13.3, 00:01:35, FastEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Now we will apply distribute list as below&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;R1#sh run | sec ospf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; ip ospf network point-to-point&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; ip ospf 1 area 0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; ip ospf 1 area 0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; ip ospf 1 area 0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;router ospf 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; log-adjacency-changes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; default-information originate always&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; distribute-list prefix NET1 in FastEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; distribute-list prefix NET2 in FastEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;R1#&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;R1#sh ip prefix-list&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ip prefix-list NET1: 2 entries&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; seq 5 deny 192.168.11.0/30&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ip prefix-list NET2: 2 entries&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; seq 5 deny 192.168.10.0/30&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;R1#&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;R1#sh ip route ospf&amp;nbsp; | i 192.168&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0 [110/3] via 10.10.13.3, 00:02:15, FastEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.11.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.11.0 [110/3] via 10.10.12.2, 00:02:15, FastEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Smitesh Kharecha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PS: Please rate helpful posts&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312418#M222347</guid>
      <dc:creator>smitesh kharecha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-22T08:20:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312419#M222348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Smitesh, I forgot to add I cannot edit R1's OSPF config, it must stay as it is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:05:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312419#M222348</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwharris13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-23T19:05:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allowing specific networks through OSPF interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312420#M222349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ashish thank you, I did get this working with some PBR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/allowing-specific-networks-through-ospf-interfaces/m-p/2312420#M222349</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwharris13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-23T19:06:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

