<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Summarizing routes with OSPF in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372111#M227497</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are both 3725's running &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T14 by the way&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>matthew-frederick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-07T19:08:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Summarizing routes with OSPF</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372110#M227496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting to play with OSPF in GNS3 and I cannot get my routes to summarize in the routing tables of R1 and R2. The routing tables are as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R1#sh ip route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gateway of last resort is not set&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.1.1.1 is directly connected, Loopback10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 2 masks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.10.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.6, 00:18:04, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.4/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.30.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.6, 00:18:05, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.20.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.6, 00:18:05, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.40.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.6, 00:18:05, FastEthernet0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R1#&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2#sh ip route&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gateway of last resort is not set&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.10.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.2.1/32 [110/11] via 10.0.0.5, 06:05:30, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.3.1/32 [110/11] via 10.0.0.5, 06:05:30, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/30 [110/20] via 10.0.0.5, 06:05:30, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.1.1/32 [110/11] via 10.0.0.5, 06:05:30, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;O&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.1.4.1/32 [110/11] via 10.0.0.5, 06:05:30, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.4/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.30.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1.30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.20.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1.20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.2.40.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2#&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have put in summary addresses in the configs of both routers (attached) but R1's routing table won't summarize the 10.2.x.x networks and R2 won't summarize the 10.1.x.x networks. Am I doing something wrong?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 05:47:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372110#M227496</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthew-frederick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T05:47:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summarizing routes with OSPF</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372111#M227497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are both 3725's running &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T14 by the way&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372111#M227497</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthew-frederick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-07T19:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Summarizing routes with OSPF</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372112#M227498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can't summarize or filter within the same OSPF area because the link-state databases have to be&amp;nbsp; the same on all routers in an area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can summarize OSPF internal routes on ABRs (area border router) between areas and external routes on ASBRs (autonomous system boundary router), where they are injected into OSPF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rolf&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372112#M227498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rolf Fischer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-07T19:32:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Summarizing routes with OSPF</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372113#M227499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you good sir!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372113#M227499</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthew-frederick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-07T19:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summarizing routes with OSPF</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372114#M227500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; You're welcome! Thanks for rating and marking as answered!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 20:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372114#M227500</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rolf Fischer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-07T20:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summarizing routes with OSPF</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372115#M227501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Matthew,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This doc might help you to understand ospf inter-area summarization&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-27672"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-27672&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ashish Shirkar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2013 07:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/summarizing-routes-with-ospf/m-p/2372115#M227501</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashirkar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-08T07:16:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

