<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic While I can't answer your in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832810#M262430</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;While I can't answer your main question and might be able to address your real task of implementing load balancing and failover for a branch office. &amp;nbsp;\&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you run PfR on only on the branch router then you'd only get the benefits on the branch to HQ traffic. &amp;nbsp;HQ to branch traffic would use normal routing. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Static routes and dynamic routing protocols (ospf/eigrp) will do load sharing and failover and might be more simple for your case. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most simple: 2 default routes with the same Administrative distances will be quick, easy and might fit in the "good enough" category. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Better: ospf/eigrp neighbors between the HQ and branch router, making the branch a stub. &amp;nbsp;The protocols will do equal cost load balancing and failover probably right out of the box. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:35:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tod Larson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-13T15:35:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PfR version 3 Performance Routing - can it be run at one site on one router ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832809#M262429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a customer that is interested in load balancing and fail-over at one of their remote offices.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now, it appears that PfR will allow for this, all in one router.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is:&amp;nbsp; Does the router on the other end also have to be configured as such?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The customer has two Ethernet connections -- one is Internet VPN, the other is a private Ethernet hand-off.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another question is -- can we even run PfR over Ethernet connections ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832809#M262429</guid>
      <dc:creator>hmcandrew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-25T22:46:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>While I can't answer your</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832810#M262430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While I can't answer your main question and might be able to address your real task of implementing load balancing and failover for a branch office. &amp;nbsp;\&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you run PfR on only on the branch router then you'd only get the benefits on the branch to HQ traffic. &amp;nbsp;HQ to branch traffic would use normal routing. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Static routes and dynamic routing protocols (ospf/eigrp) will do load sharing and failover and might be more simple for your case. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most simple: 2 default routes with the same Administrative distances will be quick, easy and might fit in the "good enough" category. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Better: ospf/eigrp neighbors between the HQ and branch router, making the branch a stub. &amp;nbsp;The protocols will do equal cost load balancing and failover probably right out of the box. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:35:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832810#M262430</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tod Larson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-13T15:35:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>To answer your questions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832811#M262431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To answer your questions though...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can do PfR on one router.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, PfR works with etherent interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is a good post to read and learn about PfR.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://blog.ine.com/2011/11/01/cisco-performance-routing-pfr-optimized-edge-routing-oer/"&gt;http://blog.ine.com/2011/11/01/cisco-performance-routing-pfr-optimized-edge-routing-oer/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pfr-version-3-performance-routing-can-it-be-run-at-one-site-on/m-p/2832811#M262431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tod Larson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-13T20:09:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

