<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BGP with two ISP in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390143#M296454</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do both routers connect to the same ISP AS, or different IPS ASs ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 13:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-28T13:35:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390118#M296453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please find the scenario below&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Two router (Router A and Router B) with one ISP link terminated on each router . EBGP is established with the ISP router and IBGP between Router A and Router B&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As of now all outgoing trafffic orginated from local network goes via Link A (terminated on router A)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wheres as incoming traffic comes via Link B (terminated on router B) resulting in assymetric .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now for specific destination host say 1.1.1.2 we want to send the traffic via link B . I belive we need to configure AS path attribute.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kindly help me with configuration for particular destination host.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 18:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390118#M296453</guid>
      <dc:creator>amaresh_22jan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T18:31:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390143#M296454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do both routers connect to the same ISP AS, or different IPS ASs ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 13:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390143#M296454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-28T13:35:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390154#M296455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Different ISP AS&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 13:53:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390154#M296455</guid>
      <dc:creator>amaresh_22jan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-28T13:53:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390198#M296458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can use local preference. The below would need to be configured on the router connected to ISP B. In this sample config, iBGP AS is 1, and the eBGP AS is 3:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;router bgp 1&lt;BR /&gt; bgp router-id 2.2.2.2&lt;BR /&gt; bgp log-neighbor-changes&lt;BR /&gt; network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.12.1 remote-as 1&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.12.1 next-hop-self&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.24.4 remote-as 3&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.24.4 route-map LOCPREF in&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;ip prefix-list LOCAL seq 5 permit 1.1.1.2/32&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;route-map LOCPREF permit 10&lt;BR /&gt; match ip address prefix-list LOCAL&lt;BR /&gt; set local-preference 200&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;route-map LOCPREF permit 20&lt;BR /&gt; set local-preference 150&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 15:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390198#M296458</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-28T15:05:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390438#M296474</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Below is the current config on the secondary router&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;router bgp 45XXX&lt;BR /&gt; bgp log-neighbor-changes&lt;BR /&gt; bgp dampening&lt;BR /&gt; network 202.19.138.0&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 124.17.58.89 remote-as 94XX&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.10.1 remote-as 45XXX&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.10.1 next-hop-self&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;202.19.138.0 is the network advertise on both the router&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;124.17.58.89 is the neighbor peer ip of the ISP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;192.168.10.1 is used for IBGP between the router&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 08:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3390438#M296474</guid>
      <dc:creator>amaresh_22jan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-29T08:23:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3393751#M296675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are a couple of ways to do what you want.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to do some load sharing you can subnet your network, assuming you can do so based on block size, then announce each out their separate links.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For instance:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;8.8.8.0/23&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Subnet&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;8.8.8.0/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;8.8.9.0/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router A&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Local pref for 8.8.8.0/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;prepend AS for 8.8.9.0/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router B&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Local pref for 8.8.9.0/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;prepend AS for 8.8.8.0/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What you get is a way to break up the block, use both links AND have failover to each other in the event of a carrier issue taking one link down over the other.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IF you are using one as a primary and one as a backup:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router A&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;local pref for 8.8.8.0/23&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router B&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;prepend AS for 8.8.8.0/23&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This way you are telling the upstream providers to use one connection over the other by your AS prepending for incoming traffic. Outbound is controlled by local pref&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 16:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3393751#M296675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-04T16:39:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3393892#M296688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Local Preference and AS-prepending would be a viable option but I would also suggest to apply some filtering on your bgp rtrs so to negate the possibility of your rtrs becoming a transit path for either ISP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The below example should allow RTRB&amp;nbsp;be the preferred rtr to reach outbound towards 1.1.1.0/24&lt;BR /&gt;and all ingress traffic to come in via RTRA&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lastly the filter-list only allows local subnets to be advertised to either ISP and not any EBGP prefixes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RTR-A&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ip as-path access-list 10 permit ^$&lt;BR /&gt;route-map LP-ISP1 permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;set local-preference 40000&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;router bgp 45XXX&lt;BR /&gt;neighbor&amp;nbsp;(ISP1) route-map LP-ISP1 in&lt;BR /&gt;neighbor&amp;nbsp;(ISP1) filter-list 10 out&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RTR-B&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ip as-path access-list 10 permit ^$&lt;BR /&gt;access-list 10 permit 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;route-map LP_ISP2 permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;match ip&amp;nbsp; address 10&lt;BR /&gt;set local-preference 50000&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;route-map LP_ISP2 permit 99&lt;BR /&gt;set local-preference 10000&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;route-map RTRB-AS-prepend permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;set as-path prepend 45XXX 45XXX 45XXX&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;router bgp 45XXX&lt;BR /&gt;neighbor (ISP2) route-map LP-ISP2 in&lt;BR /&gt;neighbor (ISP2)filter-list 10 out&lt;BR /&gt;neighbor (ISP2) route-map RTRB-AS-prepend out&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;res&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:25:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3393892#M296688</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-04T21:25:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP with two ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3408967#M297840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks everyone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By&amp;nbsp; default all the traffic is originating from Router A&amp;nbsp; but some return traffic is coming back&amp;nbsp; by Router B.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now we want traffic 1.1.1.2 should come back by router A (link A)&amp;nbsp; only. Does the below config will suffice the requirement.&amp;nbsp; Where as other return traffic may return via router A or&amp;nbsp; Router B&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On Router B&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;router bgp 45XXX&lt;BR /&gt; bgp log-neighbor-changes&lt;BR /&gt; bgp dampening&lt;BR /&gt; network 202.19.138.0&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor (ISP2) &amp;nbsp;remote-as 94XX&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;neighbor (ISP2) route-map ASPATH &amp;nbsp;out&lt;BR /&gt; neighbor 192.168.10.1 next-hop-self&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip prefix-list AS &amp;nbsp;seq 5 permit 1.1.1.2/32&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route-map ASPATH permit 10&lt;BR /&gt; set &amp;nbsp;as-path prepend 45XXX 45XXX 45XXX&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/bgp-with-two-isp/m-p/3408967#M297840</guid>
      <dc:creator>amaresh_22jan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-02T10:56:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

