<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413610#M298230</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you advertised 192.168.70.0/24 via BGP from CE2? Without the TE tunnel, can you establish communication between the two networks?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-10T20:43:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413568#M298227</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have the following network:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MPLS_TE_1.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14512iCF8F07C9C9236F1C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="MPLS_TE_1.png" alt="MPLS_TE_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ISIS is used as the IGP. Standard L3VPN MPLS setup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CE1 and CE2 are both part of Customer 1. Their ACs on both PE1 and PE2 are in VRF CUST_1. Routes are advertised over VPNv4 MP-BGP via RR1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've enabled traffic engineering on all interfaces and have setup a TE tunnel with PE1 as the headend, PE2 as the tail-end and an explicit path via P2-P3-P4-PE2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh run int tu1
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 200 bytes
!
interface Tunnel1
 ip unnumbered Loopback0
 tunnel destination 200.200.200.200
 tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
 tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name LOWER-PATH
 no routing dynamic
end

PE1#show ip explicit-paths name LOWER-PATH
PATH LOWER-PATH (strict source route, path complete, generation 6)
    1: next-address 2.2.2.2
    2: next-address 3.3.3.3
    3: next-address 4.4.4.4
    4: next-address 200.200.200.200
PE1#
&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;100.100.100.100 = PE1&lt;BR /&gt;200.200.200.200 = PE2&lt;BR /&gt;1.1.1.1 = P1 etc..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've statically routed traffic to 192.168.70.0/24 over the TE Tunnel using:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ip route vrf CUST_1 192.168.70.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel1&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I trace from CE1 to 192.168.80.1 is goes via the upper path - normal MPLS L3VPN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;CE1#trace 192.168.80.1 source lo1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.80.1

1 172.30.1.9 12 msec 12 msec 24 msec
2 10.10.110.1 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50106/52019 Exp 0] 84 msec 72 msec 108 msec
3 10.10.15.5 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50505/52019 Exp 0] 100 msec 140 msec 124 msec
4 10.10.56.6 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50600/52019 Exp 0] 112 msec 112 msec 100 msec
5 172.30.2.9 [AS 500] [MPLS: Label 52019 Exp 0] 76 msec 92 msec 64 msec
6 172.30.2.10 [AS 500] 84 msec 72 msec 92 msec&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;If I trace to 192.168.70.1 I'd like it go over the TE tunnel via the static route. But I get nothing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;CE1#trace 192.168.70.1 source lo1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.70.1

1 172.30.1.9 24 msec 12 msec 12 msec
2 * * *
3 * * *&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When doing a packet capture, I can see the ICMP request going along the lower path (i.e. through the tunnel) but the VPN label is not on the packet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So P4 PHPs the Tunnel label and it arrives at PE2 as an IP packet. PE2 has not idea what to do with, naturally, and drops it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How can make sure the VPN label (as advertised via MP-BGP from PE2) is pushed onto the IP packet at PE1 before it enters the tunnel?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 18:45:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413568#M298227</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T18:45:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413610#M298230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you advertised 192.168.70.0/24 via BGP from CE2? Without the TE tunnel, can you establish communication between the two networks?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413610#M298230</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-10T20:43:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413618#M298234</link>
      <description>You must enable RSVP or allocate all labels manually along the path...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413618#M298234</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.alekseev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-10T21:02:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413649#M298238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. If I remove the static route, traffic to 192.168.70.0/24 will follow the same path as traffic to 192.168.80.0/24.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413649#M298238</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-10T22:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413732#M298255</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you show us all mpls-te relevant configurations on your head-end? Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 03:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413732#M298255</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T03:17:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413735#M298257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I also don’t see mpls ip configured on your tunnel interfaces. You’ll need that too as you will need to have end to end LSP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 03:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3413735#M298257</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T03:30:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414164#M298277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;RSVP&amp;nbsp; is in use . I can see it in the debug output.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#debug ip rsvp dump-messages
RSVP dump-messages debugging is on
PE1#
*Mar  1 01:30:30.375: RSVP:     version:1 flags:0000 type:Path cksum:1995 ttl:255 reserved:0 length:232
*Mar  1 01:30:30.379:  SESSION              type 7 length 16:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.379:   Destination 200.200.200.200, TunnelId 1, Source 100.100.100.100, Protocol 0, Flags 0000
*Mar  1 01:30:30.379:  HOP                  type 1 length 12:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.379:   Neighbor 10.10.210.10, LIH 0x01000403
*Mar  1 01:30:30.383:  TIME_VALUES          type 1 length 8 :
*Mar  1 01:30:30.383:   Refresh period is 30000 msecs
*Mar  1 01:30:30.383:  EXPLICIT_ROUTE       type 1 length 68:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.383:   (#1) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.210.2/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.383:   (#2) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.23.2/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.387:   (#3) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.23.3/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.387:   (#4) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.34.3/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.387:   (#5) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.34.4/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.387:   (#6) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.204.4/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.387:   (#7) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 10.10.204.20/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:   (#8) Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, 200.200.200.200/32
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:  LABEL_REQUEST        type 1 length 8 :
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:   Layer 3 protocol ID: 2048
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:  SESSION_ATTRIBUTE    type 7 length 16:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:         Session name: PE1_t1
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:         Setup priority: 7, reservation priority: 7
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:         Status: May-Reroute
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:  SENDER_TEMPLATE      type 7 length 12:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:   Source 100.100.100.100, tunnel_id 19
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:  SENDER_TSPEC         type 2 length 36:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:   version=0, length in words=7
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:   Token bucket fragment (service_id=1, length=6 words
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:       parameter id=127, flags=0, parameter length=5
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:       average rate=0 bytes/sec, burst depth=1000 bytes
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:       peak rate   =0 bytes/sec
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:       min unit=0 bytes, max pkt size=2147483647 bytes
*Mar  1 01:30:30.391:  ADSPEC               type 2 length 48:
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:  version=0  length in words=10
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:  General Parameters  break bit=0  service length=8
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:                                         IS Hops:1
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:              Minimum Path Bandwidth (bytes/sec):12500000
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:                     Path Latency (microseconds):0
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:                                        Path MTU:1500
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:  Controlled Load Service  break bit=0  service length=0
*Mar  1 01:30:30.395:
PE1#&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414164#M298277</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T16:37:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414167#M298278</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is the IS-IS config, interface config and output of 'sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels tunnel 1'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(added 'mpls ip' to tunnel interface as you suggested. No change)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh run int tu1&lt;BR /&gt;Building configuration...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Current configuration : 200 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Tunnel1&lt;BR /&gt; ip unnumbered Loopback0&lt;BR /&gt; mpls ip&lt;BR /&gt; tunnel destination 200.200.200.200&lt;BR /&gt; tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng&lt;BR /&gt; tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name LOWER-PATH&lt;BR /&gt; no routing dynamic&lt;BR /&gt;end&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PE1#&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels tunnel 1

Name: PE1_t1                              (Tunnel1) Destination: 200.200.200.200
  Status:
    Admin: up         Oper: up     Path: valid       Signalling: connected

    path option 1, type explicit LOWER-PATH (Basis for Setup, path weight 40)

  Config Parameters:
    Bandwidth: 0        kbps (Global)  Priority: 7  7   Affinity: 0x0/0xFFFF
    Metric Type: TE (default)
    AutoRoute:  disabled  LockDown: disabled  Loadshare: 0        bw-based
    auto-bw: disabled

  InLabel  :  -
  OutLabel : FastEthernet1/0, 50200
  RSVP Signalling Info:
       Src 100.100.100.100, Dst 200.200.200.200, Tun_Id 1, Tun_Instance 19
    RSVP Path Info:
      My Address: 10.10.210.10
      Explicit Route: 10.10.210.2 10.10.23.2 10.10.23.3 10.10.34.3
                      10.10.34.4 10.10.204.4 10.10.204.20 200.200.200.200
      Record Route:  NONE
      Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
    RSVP Resv Info:
      Record Route:  NONE
      Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
  Shortest Unconstrained Path Info:
    Path Weight: 40 (TE)
    Explicit Route: 10.10.110.10 10.10.110.1 10.10.15.1 10.10.15.5
                    10.10.56.5 10.10.56.6 10.10.206.6 10.10.206.20
                    200.200.200.200
  History:
    Tunnel:
      Time since created: 1 hours, 33 minutes
      Time since path change: 1 hours, 33 minutes
    Current LSP:
      Uptime: 1 hours, 33 minutes
PE1#
PE1#sh run interface fa0/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 207 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 description link to P1
 ip address 10.10.110.10 255.255.255.0
 ip router isis LAB
 speed 100
 full-duplex
 mpls ip
 mpls traffic-eng tunnels &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; THIS IS ON ALL P AND PE CORE LINKS
 isis circuit-type level-2-only
end

PE1#
PE1#sh run | sec router isis
 ip router isis LAB
 ip router isis LAB
router isis LAB
 net 49.0500.0100.0100.0100.00
 is-type level-2-only
 metric-style wide
 mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
 mpls traffic-eng level-2
 passive-interface Loopback0
PE1#
&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is how PE1 sees VRF CUST_1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf CUST_1 192.168.80.0
BGP routing table entry for 500:1:192.168.80.0/24, version 10
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table CUST_1)
  Advertised to update-groups:
     1
  220
    200.200.200.200 (metric 40) from 77.77.77.77 (77.77.77.77)
      Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
      Extended Community: RT:500:1
      Originator: 200.200.200.200, Cluster list: 77.77.77.77
      mpls labels in/out nolabel/52019
PE1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf CUST_1 192.168.70.0
BGP routing table entry for 500:1:192.168.70.0/24, version 9
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table CUST_1)
  Advertised to update-groups:
     1          2
  Local
    0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (100.100.100.100)
      Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, best
      Extended Community: RT:500:1
      mpls labels in/out 51019/nolabel
PE1#sh ip route vrf CUST_1

Routing Table: CUST_1
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

B    192.168.60.0/24 [20/0] via 172.30.1.10, 01:33:57
     172.30.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B       172.30.2.8 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 01:33:42
C       172.30.1.8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
B    192.168.80.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 01:33:42
S    192.168.70.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel1
PE1#&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414167#M298278</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T16:47:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414212#M298280</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is weird. Why is your 70.x locally injected on BGP. Shouldn't this be learned from PE2?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf CUST_1 192.168.70.0
BGP routing table entry for 500:1:192.168.70.0/24, version 9
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table CUST_1)
  Advertised to update-groups:
     1          2
  Local
    0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (100.100.100.100)
      Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, best
      Extended Community: RT:500:1
      mpls labels in/out 51019/nolabel&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:45:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414212#M298280</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T17:45:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414385#M298284</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it should be done in a different way&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;create second loopback on PE2 with address 200.200.200.201&lt;BR /&gt;import it in IGP&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on PE1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;vrf definition CUST_1
rd 100.100.100.100:1
!
address-family ipv4
import map TE
route-target export 1:1
route-target import 1:1
exit-address-family

!
ip extcommunity-list 1 permit rt 1:1
!
ip prefix-list TE seq 5 permit 192.168.70.0/24
!
route-map TE permit 10
match ip address prefix-list TE
match extcommunity 1
set ip next-hop 200.200.200.201
!
route-map TE permit 20
match extcommunity 1
!
ip route 200.200.200.201 255.255.255.255 Tunnel0&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3414385#M298284</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.alekseev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-12T00:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417729#M298650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So I have configured everything as you've suggested but I don't thin the next hop is being set correctly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is my config&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh run | sec vrf CUST_1
ip vrf CUST_1
 description Customer_1_VRF
 rd 500:1
 vpn id 500:1
 import map TE_IMPORT
 route-target export 500:1
 route-target import 500:1
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;
PE1#
PE1#
PE1#sh run | sec TE_IMPORT
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;
ip prefix-list TE_IMPORT seq 5 permit 192.168.70.0/24
route-map TE_IMPORT permit 10
 match ip address TE_IMPORT
 match extcommunity 1
 set ip next-hop 200.200.200.201
route-map TE_IMPORT permit 20
 match extcommunity 1
PE1#
PE1#show ip route 200.200.200.200
Routing entry for 200.200.200.200/32
  Known via "isis", distance 115, metric 40, type level-2
  Redistributing via isis
  Last update from 10.10.110.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:34:05 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 10.10.110.1, from 200.200.200.200, via FastEthernet0/0
      Route metric is 40, traffic share count is 1

PE1#show ip route 200.200.200.201
Routing entry for 200.200.200.201/32
  Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
  Redistributing via bgp 500
  Advertised by bgp 500
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * directly connected, via Tunnel1
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

PE1#sh run int tu1
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 200 bytes
!
interface Tunnel1
 ip unnumbered Loopback0
 tunnel destination 200.200.200.200
 tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
 tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name LOWER-PATH
 no routing dynamic
end

PE1#

PE2#sh run int lo1
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 97 bytes
!
interface Loopback1
 description TE Interface
 ip address 200.200.200.201 255.255.255.255
end

PE2#sh run | sec router isis
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;
router isis LAB
 net 49.0500.0200.0200.0200.00
 is-type level-2-only
 metric-style wide
 mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
 mpls traffic-eng level-2
 passive-interface Loopback0
 passive-interface Loopback1
PE2#
&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After clearing BGP and LDP I get the following output. Note that the next-hop to 192.168.70.0/24 hasn't changed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf CUST_1 192.168.70.0
BGP routing table entry for 500:1:192.168.70.0/24, version 10
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table CUST_1)
  Advertised to update-groups:
     1
  220
    200.200.200.200 (metric 40) from 77.77.77.77 (77.77.77.77)
      Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
      Extended Community: RT:500:1
      Originator: 200.200.200.200, Cluster list: 77.77.77.77
      mpls labels in/out nolabel/52019
PE1#sh ip cef vrf CUST_1 192.168.70.0
192.168.70.0/24, version 29, epoch 0, cached adjacency 10.10.110.1
0 packets, 0 bytes
  tag information set
    local tag: VPN-route-head
    fast tag rewrite with Fa0/0, 10.10.110.1, tags imposed: {50105 52019}
  via 200.200.200.200, 0 dependencies, recursive
    next hop 10.10.110.1, FastEthernet0/0 via 200.200.200.200/32
    valid cached adjacency
    tag rewrite with Fa0/0, 10.10.110.1, tags imposed: {50105 52019}
PE1#sh ip ro vrf CUST_1

Routing Table: CUST_1
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

B    192.168.60.0/24 [20/0] via 172.30.1.10, 00:09:07
     172.30.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B       172.30.2.8 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:08:53
C       172.30.1.8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
B    192.168.80.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:08:53
B    192.168.70.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:08:53
PE1#&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I do a traceroute from CE1 traffic to both 192.168.70.0/24 and&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;192.168.80.0/2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4&amp;nbsp;do not enter the tunnel and take the upper path.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;CE1#trace 192.168.70.1 source lo1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.70.1

  1 172.30.1.9 16 msec 24 msec 20 msec
  2 10.10.110.1 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50105/52019 Exp 0] 124 msec 92 msec 124 msec
  3 10.10.15.5 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50504/52019 Exp 0] 96 msec 92 msec 120 msec
  4 10.10.56.6 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50600/52019 Exp 0] 80 msec 108 msec 56 msec
  5 172.30.2.9 [AS 500] [MPLS: Label 52019 Exp 0] 92 msec 88 msec 68 msec
  6 172.30.2.10 [AS 500] 112 msec 112 msec 108 msec
CE1#trace 192.168.80.1 source lo1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.80.1

  1 172.30.1.9 8 msec 12 msec 24 msec
  2 10.10.110.1 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50105/52018 Exp 0] 112 msec 192 msec 124 msec
  3 10.10.15.5 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50504/52018 Exp 0] 60 msec 128 msec 64 msec
  4 10.10.56.6 [AS 500] [MPLS: Labels 50600/52018 Exp 0] 124 msec 124 msec 108 msec
  5 172.30.2.9 [AS 500] [MPLS: Label 52018 Exp 0] 104 msec 96 msec 84 msec
  6 172.30.2.10 [AS 500] 116 msec 68 msec 120 msec
CE1#&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Should 200.200.200.201 be in the CUST_1 vrf?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417729#M298650</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T18:47:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417732#M298652</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;route-map TE_IMPORT permit 10
 match ip address TE_IMPORT&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It should be "match ip address prefix-list TE_IMPORT"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417732#M298652</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T18:49:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417738#M298653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes of course. Schoolboy error. Sorry about that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However I've correct it and cleared BGP and it still hasn't been reset...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#
PE1#
PE1#
PE1#sh run | sec TE
 import map TE_IMPORT
ip prefix-list TE_IMPORT seq 5 permit 192.168.70.0/24
route-map TE_IMPORT permit 10
 match ip address prefix-list TE_IMPORT
 match extcommunity 1
 set ip next-hop 200.200.200.201
route-map TE_IMPORT permit 20
 match extcommunity 1
PE1#
PE1#sh ip cef vrf CUST_1 192.168.70.0
192.168.70.0/24, version 33, epoch 0, cached adjacency 10.10.110.1
0 packets, 0 bytes
  tag information set
    local tag: VPN-route-head
    fast tag rewrite with Fa0/0, 10.10.110.1, tags imposed: {50105 52019}
  via 200.200.200.200, 0 dependencies, recursive
    next hop 10.10.110.1, FastEthernet0/0 via 200.200.200.200/32
    valid cached adjacency
    tag rewrite with Fa0/0, 10.10.110.1, tags imposed: {50105 52019}
PE1#
PE1#sh ip ro vrf CUST_1

Routing Table: CUST_1
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

B    192.168.60.0/24 [20/0] via 172.30.1.10, 00:05:03
     172.30.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B       172.30.2.8 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:04:56
C       172.30.1.8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
B    192.168.80.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:04:56
B    192.168.70.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:04:56
PE1#&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417738#M298653</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T19:03:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417742#M298654</link>
      <description>show full configs for PE1, PE2</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417742#M298654</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.alekseev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T19:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417745#M298655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what's the content of 1?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;match extcommunity 1&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:09:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417745#M298655</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T19:09:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417801#M298659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;See attached for configs of PE1 and PE2&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 21:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417801#M298659</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T21:23:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417809#M298662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The content is as follows:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ip extcommunity-list 1 permit rt 500:1&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However even if I remove all match statements from the route-map (meaning match all) the next hop is still not being set correctly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE1#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
PE1(config)#route-map TE_IMPORT permit 10
PE1(config-route-map)#no  match ip address prefix-list TE_IMPORT
PE1(config-route-map)#no match extcommunity 1
PE1(config-route-map)#^Z
PE1#
*Mar  1 00:10:45.167: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
PE1#
PE1#clear ip bgp *
PE1#
*Mar  1 00:11:04.399: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 77.77.77.77 Down User reset
*Mar  1 00:11:04.399: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 172.30.1.10 vpn vrf CUST_1 Down User reset
*Mar  1 00:11:04.923: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 77.77.77.77 Up
PE1#
*Mar  1 00:11:05.603: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 172.30.1.10 vpn vrf CUST_1 Up
PE1#sh ip ro vrf CUST_1

Routing Table: CUST_1
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

B    192.168.60.0/24 [20/0] via 172.30.1.10, 00:00:10
     172.30.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B       172.30.2.8 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:00:03
C       172.30.1.8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
B    192.168.80.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:00:03
B    192.168.70.0/24 [200/0] via 200.200.200.200, 00:00:03&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 21:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417809#M298662</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T21:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417816#M298664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;show the outputs from PE1&lt;BR /&gt; sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels&lt;BR /&gt; sh ip route&lt;BR /&gt; sh int tu1&lt;BR /&gt; sh ip bgp vpn4 vrf CUST_1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 21:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3417816#M298664</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.alekseev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-18T21:45:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3673045#M299029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Change the RD on one end. Try to make it unique and you'll see the set clause would work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3673045#M299029</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpl861</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-24T12:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot statically route MPLS L3VPN over TE Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3674634#M299089</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;See attached for requested output.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ignore routes for 44.x.x.x 33.x.x.x or 99.x.x.x. I've added to the lab but these are unrelated to the MPLS L3VPN setup.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/cannot-statically-route-mpls-l3vpn-over-te-tunnel/m-p/3674634#M299089</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven.crutchley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-25T17:58:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

