<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Routing issue between sites in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/routing-issue-between-sites/m-p/3909277#M319973</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Additional info:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've found something else:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From 192.168.10.2 in site A:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ping 192.168.20.25 from site A fails (remote host)&lt;BR /&gt;ping 192.168.20.254 from site A succeeds (remote VLAN IP)&lt;BR /&gt;ping 10.48.35.49 drops every other packet (remote routed port in site C)&lt;BR /&gt;ping 10.48.35.50 succeeds (local routed port in site A)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 192.168.20.25 from site A fails (remote host)&lt;BR /&gt; 1 &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 192.168.10.250&lt;BR /&gt; 2 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  2 ms &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; 10.48.35.49&lt;BR /&gt; 3 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; Request timed out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 192.168.20.254 from site A succeeds (remote VLAN IP)&lt;BR /&gt; 1 &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 192.168.10.250&lt;BR /&gt; 2 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  2 ms &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; 192.168.20.254&lt;BR /&gt; 3 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; Request timed out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 10.48.35.49 from site A succeeds, but strange&amp;nbsp; (remote routed port in site C)&lt;BR /&gt; 1 &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 192.168.10.250&lt;BR /&gt; 2 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  2 ms &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; 10.48.35.49&lt;BR /&gt; 3 &amp;nbsp; 3ms  *&amp;nbsp;  2ms &amp;nbsp; 10.48.35.49&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 10.48.35.50 from site A succeeds &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; local, one hop.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;  1  2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 10.48.35.50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site C to Site A has no issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brad Hodgins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-16T16:03:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Routing issue between sites</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/routing-issue-between-sites/m-p/3909201#M319970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I asked this on the Spiceworks forum as well, but I thought that I'd ask here as well:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I've been working on setting up routing between two switching stacks with little success. I've spent 9 hours on this so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first stack is an Avaya ERS stack. The second is a Cisco 3750x stack. Both are licensed for L3 and do inter-vlan routing well. This Cisco stack will be going to our DC and is currently connected via a 1GB ethernet cable in the same rack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Avaya infrastructure is pre-existing with the exception of the routing port mentioned below. The Cisco infrastructure is a new setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Cisco end has a port enabled as a router port with the IP 10.48.35.49/30&lt;BR /&gt;The Avaya end has a similar port enabled as a "brouter" in their lingo. (a port in it's own vlan) with an IP&lt;BR /&gt;of 10.48.35.50/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site (A)vaya has VLAN 1 with an IP of 192.168.1.250 and VLAN 10 with an IP of 192.168.10.250 as well as VLAN 50 (192.168.50.250) to which a inside port of a firewall is connected. Avaya's default route of 0.0.0.0 is the firewall inside 192.168.50.100 (functioning fine)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site (C)isco has VLAN 2 (192.168.2.254) and VLAN 20 (192.168.20.254)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neither VLAN is defined on the opposite site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A host in site A can ping it's local 10.48.35.50 with a sub 1ms response time and no packet loss, however when it pings anything on the (C)isco side 10.48.35.49, the latency gets above 1ms, more like 12-18ms with about 8% packet loss. Pinging the far VLANs 2 and 20 IPs is successful with similar latency, however pinging of hosts connected to those VLANs is unsuccessful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The hosts in site C can ping it's local 10.48.35.49 Pinging the far VLANs 1 and 10 IPs is successful pinging of VLAN IPs as well as the hosts connected to those VLANs is unsuccessful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The weird thing is, when I tracert from a host in VLAN 2 (192.168.2.25) from site C to a host in site A on VLAN 10 (192.168.10.2), the first hop is the router interface facing the firewall 192.168.50.250, then the target.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I have a routing loop issue? I'm not all that familiar with Avaya systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciisco stack:&lt;BR /&gt;Gateway of last resort is 192.168.51.251 to network 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.51.251&lt;BR /&gt;10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks&lt;BR /&gt;C 10.48.35.48/30 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet2/0/20&lt;BR /&gt;L 10.48.35.49/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet2/0/20&lt;BR /&gt;S 192.168.1.0/24 [1/0] via 10.48.35.50&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.51.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks&lt;BR /&gt;C 192.168.51.248/29 is directly connected, Vlan51&lt;BR /&gt;L 192.168.51.254/32 is directly connected, Vlan51&lt;BR /&gt;S 192.168.10.0/24 [1/0] via 10.48.35.50&lt;BR /&gt;S 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected&lt;BR /&gt;is directly connected, GigabitEthernet2/0/20&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.2.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks&lt;BR /&gt;C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan2&lt;BR /&gt;L 192.168.2.254/32 is directly connected, Vlan2&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.20.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks&lt;BR /&gt;C 192.168.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan20&lt;BR /&gt;L 192.168.20.254/32 is directly connected, Vlan20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Avaya stack:&lt;BR /&gt;DST MASK NEXT     COST VLAN PORT PROT TYPE PRF&lt;BR /&gt;0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.50.1      5  50  T#4   S   IB 5   &lt;BR /&gt;10.48.35.48 255.255.255.252 10.48.35.50    1 4094  ----   C   DB 0&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.250     1 1    ----  C    DB 0&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.250    1 10    ----  C   DB 0&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.250   1 50    ----  C  DB 0&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.48.35.49      1 4094  3/10  S  IB 5&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.48.35.49     1 4094  3/10   S  IB 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Avaya "brouter" port is in VLAN 4094, port 3/10, directly connected to the routing port on the Cisco stack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems like when the packet reaches the Cisco port, there's no destination VLAN tag applied or it doesn't know where to send it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inter-VLAN traffic within either stack works fine. A host on the Cisco stack of 192.168.2.2 can reach 192.168.20.25 and the internet via 51.251.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/routing-issue-between-sites/m-p/3909201#M319970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brad Hodgins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T14:15:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing issue between sites</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/routing-issue-between-sites/m-p/3909277#M319973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Additional info:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've found something else:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From 192.168.10.2 in site A:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ping 192.168.20.25 from site A fails (remote host)&lt;BR /&gt;ping 192.168.20.254 from site A succeeds (remote VLAN IP)&lt;BR /&gt;ping 10.48.35.49 drops every other packet (remote routed port in site C)&lt;BR /&gt;ping 10.48.35.50 succeeds (local routed port in site A)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 192.168.20.25 from site A fails (remote host)&lt;BR /&gt; 1 &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 192.168.10.250&lt;BR /&gt; 2 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  2 ms &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; 10.48.35.49&lt;BR /&gt; 3 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; Request timed out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 192.168.20.254 from site A succeeds (remote VLAN IP)&lt;BR /&gt; 1 &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 192.168.10.250&lt;BR /&gt; 2 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  2 ms &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; 192.168.20.254&lt;BR /&gt; 3 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; Request timed out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 10.48.35.49 from site A succeeds, but strange&amp;nbsp; (remote routed port in site C)&lt;BR /&gt; 1 &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 192.168.10.250&lt;BR /&gt; 2 &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  2 ms &amp;nbsp; * &amp;nbsp; 10.48.35.49&lt;BR /&gt; 3 &amp;nbsp; 3ms  *&amp;nbsp;  2ms &amp;nbsp; 10.48.35.49&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tracert 10.48.35.50 from site A succeeds &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; local, one hop.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;  1  2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms &amp;nbsp; 2 ms 10.48.35.50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site C to Site A has no issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/routing-issue-between-sites/m-p/3909277#M319973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brad Hodgins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T16:03:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

