<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetFlow issue in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081490#M334011</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, create loopback and add it to the vrf. That would be your source and the destination to Solarwinds would also point to the vrf. The Gi0/1 would have the ip flow monitor command.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mentioned VLANs, as I don't know if you have an L3 Switch with VLANs or L3 VLANs, which you want to monitor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 19:34:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>grabonlee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-07T19:34:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4071923#M333085</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject lia-component-message-view-widget-subject"&gt;&lt;DIV class="MessageSubject"&gt;&lt;DIV class="MessageSubjectIcons "&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-subject"&gt;NetFlow Export server reachable via Mgmt VRF but still not working&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-message-read"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body lia-component-message-view-widget-body lia-component-body-signature-highlight-escalation lia-component-message-view-widget-body-signature-highlight-escalation"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;See attachment of simple topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if the Solarwinds or whatever application you are sending NetFlow stats from a router is reachable via the router's Mgmt Int vrf which is assigned to G1 (so it pings&amp;nbsp;10.1.1.1 only sourcing from mgmt vrf), that should not be a problem correct as NetFlow is still not sending any statistics, nor can I add it to Solarwinds? I have the FlowMonitor input activated under a different interface that I want to see data from and not on the interface the Mgmt interface is assigned to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Making sure I am not missing anything since the Router 1 is setup this way with reachability to the Solarwinds/NetFlow exporter via mgmt VRF.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also if I remember,&amp;nbsp;1&amp;nbsp;sh flow exporter statistics&amp;nbsp; does not show anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 01:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4071923#M333085</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T01:29:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4071955#M333089</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you share your config please?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you tried capturing traffic on your switch to see if netflow packets are hitting the switch?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 02:27:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4071955#M333089</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T02:27:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072398#M333143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is basically the config. It is actually showing statistics however nothing is showing up in Solarwinds. SNMP to Solarwinds works for the device if that helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;flow record Flow-Record1&lt;BR /&gt;description Netflow to SW&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 source address&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 destination address&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 protocol&lt;BR /&gt;match transport source-port&lt;BR /&gt;match transport destination-port&lt;BR /&gt;match transport tcp destination-port&lt;BR /&gt;match transport udp destination-port&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 tos&lt;BR /&gt;match interface input&lt;BR /&gt;match interface output&lt;BR /&gt;collect interface input&lt;BR /&gt;collect interface output&lt;BR /&gt;collect counter packets&lt;BR /&gt;collect timestamp sys-uptime first&lt;BR /&gt;collect timestamp sys-uptime last&lt;BR /&gt;collect timestamp absolute first&lt;BR /&gt;collect counter packets&lt;BR /&gt;collect application name&lt;BR /&gt;collect counter bytes long&lt;BR /&gt;collect counter packets long&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;More Options if needed:&lt;BR /&gt;collect routing source as&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;flow exporter Flow-Exporter1&lt;BR /&gt;destination 10.1.1.1 (dest 10.1.1.1 vrf-mgmt does not work either)&lt;BR /&gt;source int g0/1&lt;BR /&gt;export-protocol netflow-v9&lt;BR /&gt;transport udp 2055&lt;BR /&gt;template data timeout 60&lt;BR /&gt;option application-table timeout 60&lt;BR /&gt;option application-attributes timeout 300&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;flow monitor Flow-Monitor1&lt;BR /&gt;exporter Flow-Exporter1&lt;BR /&gt;cache timeout active 60&lt;BR /&gt;record Flow-Record1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int g0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip flow monitor Flow-Monitor1 input&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 18:54:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072398#M333143</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-07T18:54:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072478#M333154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/124138"&gt;@CiscoBrownBelt&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I apologize if I put a dumb question:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have you configured the flow monitor under interfaces on the device inbound or outbound?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072478#M333154</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T15:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072584#M333166</link>
      <description>Yes. Would source from mgmt interface have anything to do with it? I read that is not supported for ASR or something like that. The thing is, what if connected to the switch where the NetFlow collector resides has reachability through the mgmt vrf? I would have to make routing updates or changes.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072584#M333166</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T16:43:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072870#M333184</link>
      <description>Yes now you're mentioning it, i remember this is a limitation. Here the for Fuji saying not supported:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/netflow/configuration/xe-16-9/nf-xe-16-9-book/cfg-nflow-data-expt-xe.html#GUID-E8176824-AEC3-4A1D-9432-B70F67E2B776" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/netflow/configuration/xe-16-9/nf-xe-16-9-book/cfg-nflow-data-expt-xe.html#GUID-E8176824-AEC3-4A1D-9432-B70F67E2B776&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Create a loopback and use it as source of the exporter within the same vrf.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4072870#M333184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-24T02:40:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4073966#M333302</link>
      <description>Yes thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;It says not supported through management interface so I believe G0 is the management interface VRF on these ASRs.&lt;BR /&gt;Since you say create Lo and source still out the mgmt VRF that would work even though its still through the mgmt vrf (just so I am understanding correctly)?&lt;BR /&gt;It appears that this mgmt restriction applies to just version 9 no? Think trying version 8 or 5 may work?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4073966#M333302</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-25T13:21:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4074497#M333393</link>
      <description>Yes it's not supported through the management OOB physical interface. But in the config, you can have a loopback or any other physical interface from the mgmt vrf and it should work.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:02:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4074497#M333393</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-27T00:02:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4074960#M333425</link>
      <description>Think trying version 8 or 5 may work?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:11:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4074960#M333425</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-27T15:11:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4075078#M333438</link>
      <description>Go with netflow version 9 but yes both should work</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4075078#M333438</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-27T18:12:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4079816#M333895</link>
      <description>So if a router only has connectivity to the switch where the NetFlow server lives via a interface assigned to mgmt vrf, exporting even using a different interface is still not working (Cisco says export via mgmt interface is not supported). I assume its because reach-ability only exists via the mgmt vrf. Do you think its the case?&lt;BR /&gt;Normal SNMP to server is fine.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 15:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4079816#M333895</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-05T15:53:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080042#M333911</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So if a router only has connectivity to the switch where the NetFlow server lives via a interface assigned to mgmt vrf, exporting even using a different interface is still not working (Cisco says export via mgmt interface is not supported). I assume its because reach-ability only exists via the mgmt vrf. Do you think its the case?&lt;BR /&gt;Normal SNMP to server is fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 20:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080042#M333911</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-05T20:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080170#M333920</link>
      <description>Normally it should not work if sourcing with the physical management interface but it should work sourcing with a loopback sitting in the mgmt-vrf. If not working, I suggest you open a TAC case because doc doesn't say using the mgmt VRF wouldn't work.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 02:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080170#M333920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-06T02:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080806#M333958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am actually trying to source from the same interace NetFlow input is activated on as it is the only other interface I can use (I corrected source above).&lt;BR /&gt;I tied adding "Destination 10.1.1.1 vrf mgmt" as well however it still does not work. Do you think it is because i am trying to source from same interface it is turned on which is the interface I need to see data?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 20:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080806#M333958</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-06T20:39:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080856#M333961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It well documented that Netflow won't work with Gig0 (Mgmt Vrf) as the source interface and as you said, you don't have spare interfaces.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have SVIs, then you can source from an SVI or create a loopback. If you want to put any of your source interfaces in a VRF, add the following on your exporter config and test:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;destination&amp;nbsp;x.x.x.x vrf vrf_name&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;source vlan or loopback&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 22:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4080856#M333961</guid>
      <dc:creator>grabonlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-06T22:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081272#M333996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/124138"&gt;@CiscoBrownBelt&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#339966"&gt;Looking back to your Netflow config, the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;ip flow monitor Flow-Monitor1 input shouldn't be on the same port used as the source interface. It should on the interfaces or VLAN (using the VLAN vlan_id configuration command) that you want to monitor. Also Gi0/1 should be part of the VRF that you used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 14:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081272#M333996</guid>
      <dc:creator>grabonlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-07T14:06:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081465#M334006</link>
      <description>"Looking back to your Netflow config, the ip flow monitor Flow-Monitor1 input shouldn't be on the same port used as the source interface." Yes that is what i thought. Thing is, I don't have another port to source from other than the mgmt port so creating a loopback may be the best option and adding the loopback under the mgmt vrf correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;" It should on the interfaces or VLAN (using the VLAN vlan_id configuration command) that you want to monitor. Also Gi0/1 should be part of the VRF that you used."&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure what you mean? FlowMon is on G0/1 which is what I want to monitor. Source vrf-mgmt does not work and g0/1 is only port available other than creating a loopback.Create loopback and add it to the mgmt-vrf correct?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 18:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081465#M334006</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-07T18:53:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081490#M334011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, create loopback and add it to the vrf. That would be your source and the destination to Solarwinds would also point to the vrf. The Gi0/1 would have the ip flow monitor command.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mentioned VLANs, as I don't know if you have an L3 Switch with VLANs or L3 VLANs, which you want to monitor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 19:34:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081490#M334011</guid>
      <dc:creator>grabonlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-07T19:34:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081622#M334021</link>
      <description>Hi it is a Cisco ASR which does not support export via mgmt interface.&lt;BR /&gt;It is a vrf-mgmt under the actual mgmt interface which has the route back to the collector. So if I create a lo0 and add it to that same vrf-mgmt it will work?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 23:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081622#M334021</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoBrownBelt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-07T23:46:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetFlow issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081666#M334024</link>
      <description>Yea it should work</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 01:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/netflow-issue/m-p/4081666#M334024</guid>
      <dc:creator>grabonlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-08T01:53:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

