<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End in Routing</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162208#M340508</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Giuseppe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok so we are getting somewhere with this which is good. My thooughts below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;My understanding is the RP only needs to be added to the Mcast source, are you saying I should add these on Router 01, outer 01, Switch Stack 01, Firewall 01 and FIrewall 02?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Regarding your point:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; you could use bootstrap protocol but you need explicit configuraton to have candidate BSR and candidate RPs on&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; different nodes.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; How could this be implemented onto my topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-06T15:47:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161729#M340467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue that has got a lot of us stumped regarding multicast and need some support. Specific multicast configs from the equipment (includes 'show ip route' &amp;amp; 'show ip mroute') and a topology of the network are attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a multicast client connected to Core Switch 01 (192.168.227.116) which needs to join multicast group 239.192.0.22. The RP is 192.168.1.74 which is a subnet on the Core Switch 02 LAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have PIM SM running on all connecting L3 interfaces, configured the RP on Core Switch 01 and can confirm all network devices can route to 192.168.1.74. However when we test multicast from the 192.168.227.226 client, we cannot see anything onwards from Routers 01 and 02 so the issue looks to be between Core Switch 01 and the aforementioned Routers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody have any ideas of what is misisng on the attached configs or what else we could try please? We have had a number of engineers review this and nothing is obvious. One thing that to note: Routers 01 &amp;amp; 02 are partaking i HSRP: there is a staic route from Core Switch 01 to the HSRP VIP so I don't know if that is causing anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 19:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161729#M340467</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-05T19:07:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161768#M340472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looks like you are performing static RP assignment (&lt;STRONG&gt;ip pim rp-address 192.168.1.74&lt;/STRONG&gt;), but you don't have these static mapping to the RP specified on any other PIm active's rtrs apart from the core switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 20:45:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161768#M340472</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-05T20:45:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161773#M340473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need these on every L3 device partaking in PIM? I thought as long as I'm running PIM SM the protocol will learn about the RP automatically via BSR&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 21:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161773#M340473</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-05T21:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161945#M340487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;post the config of Switch Stack 02 and the other firewall as well, so we can lab this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 08:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161945#M340487</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T08:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161962#M340488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-link-navigation lia-attachment-link-disabled lia-link-disabled"&gt;Hello&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-link-navigation lia-attachment-link-disabled lia-link-disabled"&gt;It needs to be applied on the rtrs where the MC source resides (First Hop Router =FHR) and on the rtrs (Last hop Router -LHR) where the MC receivers reside downstream.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 08:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161962#M340488</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T08:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161977#M340489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;are these the full configurations, or just partial ones ? Looking at the below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.227.153 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; subnet 192.168.227.152 ? this is not advertised in OSPF ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;standby version 2&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 ip 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 timers 1 3&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 priority 50&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.232.67 255.255.255.240&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;router ospf 1&lt;BR /&gt;redistribute static subnets&lt;BR /&gt;passive-interface default&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ? where is that interface&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; network 192.168.226.0 0.0.1.255 area 0 ? where is that network&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;network 192.168.232.64 0.0.0.15 area 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.227.154 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; subnet 192.168.227.152 ? this is not advertised in OSPF ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;standby version 2&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 ip 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 timers 1 3&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 priority 150&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.232.68 255.255.255.240&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;router ospf 1&lt;BR /&gt;redistribute static subnets&lt;BR /&gt;passive-interface default&lt;BR /&gt;no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; network 192.168.226.0 0.0.1.255 area 0 ? where is that network ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;network 192.168.232.64 0.0.0.15 area 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, if one of your ASA interfaces manually joins an IGMP group, what is the result ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 09:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4161977#M340489</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T09:38:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162094#M340495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment we are fault finding why multicast traffic doesn't reach Switch Stack 02 from Core Switch 01. Having looked at the mcast counters, there seems to be an issue with mcast traffic routing from Core Switch 01 VLAN 350, to VLAN 500 to Router 02 (active HSRP router).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See attached updated topology, we are team 01 whereas the interfacing party is team 02 and it's their LAN where the RP resites. All unicat routing is correct, it's just the multicast.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:59:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162094#M340495</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T12:59:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162123#M340500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I don't have the config for Switch Stack 02 as this belongs to someone else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If possible, would you be able to lab the equipment s per the toplogy excluding Firewall 02 (this is just the standby Firewall) and Switch Stack 02 please? Switch Stack 02 is where the RP resides in the 192.168.0.0/22 subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment we are fault finding why multicast traffic doesn't reach Switch Stack 02 from Core Switch 01. Having looked at the mcast counters, &lt;STRONG&gt;there seems to be an issue with mcast traffic routing from Core Switch 01 VLAN 350, to VLAN 500 to Router 02 (active HSRP router)&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See attached updated topology, we are team 01 whereas the interfacing party is team 02 and it's their LAN where the RP resites. All unicat routing is correct, it's just the multicast.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 13:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162123#M340500</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T13:54:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162125#M340501</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the problem might be the HSRP. Try and add PIM redundancy to your HSRP configurations:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.227.153 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;standby version 2&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 ip 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 timers 1 3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; standby 1 name HSRP1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; ip pim redundancy HSRP1 dr-priority 50&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 priority 50&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 preempt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.227.154 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;standby version 2&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 ip 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 timers 1 3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; standby 1 name HSRP1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;--&amp;gt; ip pim redundancy HSRP1 dr-priority 150&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 priority 150&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 preempt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 13:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162125#M340501</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T13:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162153#M340503</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see output below for ip mroute, doesn't looks like the route to 239.192.0.22 is installed properly on Router 01 &amp;amp; 02:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Core Switch 01&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sh ip mroute&lt;BR /&gt;IP Multicast Routing Table&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,&lt;BR /&gt;L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,&lt;BR /&gt;T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,&lt;BR /&gt;X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,&lt;BR /&gt;U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,&lt;BR /&gt;Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,&lt;BR /&gt;Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,&lt;BR /&gt;G - Received BGP C-Mroute, g - Sent BGP C-Mroute,&lt;BR /&gt;N - Received BGP Shared-Tree Prune, n - BGP C-Mroute suppressed,&lt;BR /&gt;Q - Received BGP S-A Route, q - Sent BGP S-A Route,&lt;BR /&gt;V - RD &amp;amp; Vector, v - Vector, p - PIM Joins on route,&lt;BR /&gt;x - VxLAN group&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner, p - PIM Join&lt;BR /&gt;Timers: Uptime/Expires&lt;BR /&gt;Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 00:03:18/00:02:35, RP 192.168.1.74, flags: SJCL&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: Vlan500, RPF nbr 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list:&lt;BR /&gt;Vlan350, Forward/Sparse, 00:03:18/00:02:22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Router 02 (Active HSRP Router)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.227.154 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim redundancy HSRP1 hsrp dr-priority 150&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;standby version 2&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 name HSRP1&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 ip 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 timers 1 3&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 priority 150&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 track 500 decrement 150&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh ip mroute&lt;BR /&gt;IP Multicast Routing Table&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,&lt;BR /&gt;L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,&lt;BR /&gt;T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,&lt;BR /&gt;X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,&lt;BR /&gt;U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,&lt;BR /&gt;Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,&lt;BR /&gt;Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,&lt;BR /&gt;G - Received BGP C-Mroute, g - Sent BGP C-Mroute,&lt;BR /&gt;N - Received BGP Shared-Tree Prune, n - BGP C-Mroute suppressed,&lt;BR /&gt;Q - Received BGP S-A Route, q - Sent BGP S-A Route,&lt;BR /&gt;V - RD &amp;amp; Vector, v - Vector, p - PIM Joins on route,&lt;BR /&gt;x - VxLAN group&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner, p - PIM Join&lt;BR /&gt;Timers: Uptime/Expires&lt;BR /&gt;Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 00:05:36/00:02:18, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: SP&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list: Null&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Router 01 (Standby HSRP Router)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.227.154 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim redundancy HSRP1 hsrp dr-priority 150&lt;BR /&gt;ip pim sparse-mode&lt;BR /&gt;standby version 2&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 name HSRP1&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 ip 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 timers 1 3&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 priority 150&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;standby 500 track 500 decrement 150&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh ip mroute&lt;BR /&gt;IP Multicast Routing Table&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,&lt;BR /&gt;L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,&lt;BR /&gt;T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,&lt;BR /&gt;X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,&lt;BR /&gt;U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,&lt;BR /&gt;Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,&lt;BR /&gt;Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,&lt;BR /&gt;G - Received BGP C-Mroute, g - Sent BGP C-Mroute,&lt;BR /&gt;N - Received BGP Shared-Tree Prune, n - BGP C-Mroute suppressed,&lt;BR /&gt;Q - Received BGP S-A Route, q - Sent BGP S-A Route,&lt;BR /&gt;V - RD &amp;amp; Vector, v - Vector, p - PIM Joins on route,&lt;BR /&gt;x - VxLAN group&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner, p - PIM Join&lt;BR /&gt;Timers: Uptime/Expires&lt;BR /&gt;Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 00:05:36/00:02:18, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: SP&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list: Null&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162153#M340503</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T14:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162198#M340506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/189339"&gt;@conor.maton&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Paul Driver is right if you decided to go with manual RP configuration you need to configure &lt;U&gt;this on all PIM routers not only on the RP device itself and also the firewalls as they act as PIM SM multicast routers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's compare the output from R1:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 00:05:36/00:02:18, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: SP&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list: Null&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;incoming interface Null, outgoing interface null and RP 0.0.0.0 means that this device does not know what RP address to use and this prevents PIM SM processes to happen.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you could use bootstrap protocol but you need explicit configuraton to have candidate BSR and candidate RPs on different nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You see the difference with&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 00:03:18/00:02:35, RP 192.168.1.74, flags: SJCL&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: Vlan500, RPF nbr 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list:&lt;BR /&gt;Vlan350, Forward/Sparse, 00:03:18/00:02:22&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;on Core switch 1 here the RP is known there is an incoming interface and there is an outgoing interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also Georg's notes about unicast routing possible issues can apply&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162198#M340506</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T15:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162208#M340508</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Giuseppe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok so we are getting somewhere with this which is good. My thooughts below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;My understanding is the RP only needs to be added to the Mcast source, are you saying I should add these on Router 01, outer 01, Switch Stack 01, Firewall 01 and FIrewall 02?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Regarding your point:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; you could use bootstrap protocol but you need explicit configuraton to have candidate BSR and candidate RPs on&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; different nodes.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; How could this be implemented onto my topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162208#M340508</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T15:47:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162219#M340510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/189339"&gt;@conor.maton&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) All routers and firewalls must know RP address because they first join the shared tree rooted at the RP and then they switch to the source based tree rooted at the source PIM DR. The easiest way is to configure ip pim rp on all of them&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please notice that you need to ensure that the router that is active on HSRP is also the PIM DR on the LAN segment where the source or receiver is connected (these are the kind of issues that HSRP can create).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) It is not clear what the firewall vendor is . bootstrap protocol is standard in PIM version 2. If the network is not much bigger then this I would try with manual RP option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:58:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162219#M340510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T15:58:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162228#M340511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325924"&gt;@Giuseppe Larosa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;1) All routers and firewalls must know RP address because they first join the shared tree rooted at the RP and then they switch to the source based tree rooted at the source PIM DR. The easiest way is to configure ip pim rp on all of them&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok thank you for the clarification. See my response to point 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Please notice that you need to ensure that the router that is active on HSRP is also the PIM DR on the LAN segment where the source or receiver is connected (these are the kind of issues that HSRP can create).&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am guessing you mean HSRP Aware PIM? See output from Core Switch 01:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ABW-SISS-LAN-CSW001#sh ip pim neighbor&lt;BR /&gt;PIM Neighbor Table&lt;BR /&gt;Mode: B - Bidir Capable, DR - Designated Router, N - Default DR Priority,&lt;BR /&gt;P - Proxy Capable, S - State Refresh Capable, G - GenID Capable,&lt;BR /&gt;L - DR Load-balancing Capable&lt;BR /&gt;Neighbor Interface Uptime/Expires Ver DR&lt;BR /&gt;Address Prio/Mode&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.227.153 Vlan500 1w0d/00:01:23 v2 1 / S P G&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.227.154 Vlan500 1w0d/00:01:43 v2 1 / S P G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2) It is not clear what the firewall vendor is . bootstrap protocol is standard in PIM version 2. If the network is not much bigger then this I would try with manual RP option.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All devices are Cisco and running PIM SM (the Firewall is a CIsco ASA 5515-X and I don't believe you explicitly configure the mcast protocol type). That's why I was surpised that I may have to configure the RP on all devices. How can I activate Boostrap protocol?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162228#M340511</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T16:10:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162368#M340519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/189339"&gt;@conor.maton&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;see the following thread&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/question-about-bsr-for-anycast-rp/td-p/3683518?dtid=osscdc000283&amp;amp;lightbox-message-images-3683518=16278i704326614D5D0220" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/question-about-bsr-for-anycast-rp/td-p/3683518?dtid=osscdc000283&amp;amp;lightbox-message-images-3683518=16278i704326614D5D0220&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can have the bsr candidate and the RP candidate to be on th same device&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You need to use a Loopback interface as the address referenced for both the RP and bsr.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The loopback has to be advertised in IGP or via static routes all devices must be able to send traffic to the loopback address&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;global config&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip pim bsr Loopback0 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip pim rp-candidate Loopback0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;check on all devices&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;show ip pim rp mapping&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have ASA firewall I would try to use manual RP first as I am not sure it is able to support bootstrap.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 20:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162368#M340519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T20:37:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162375#M340521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325924"&gt;@Giuseppe Larosa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a test I have tried adding the PIM RP address manually on all devices. Does the output from show IP mroute look better to you on Core Switch 01 and Routers 01 &amp;amp; 02?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Core Switch 01&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sh ip mroute&lt;BR /&gt;IP Multicast Routing Table&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,&lt;BR /&gt;L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,&lt;BR /&gt;T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,&lt;BR /&gt;X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,&lt;BR /&gt;U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,&lt;BR /&gt;Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,&lt;BR /&gt;Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,&lt;BR /&gt;G - Received BGP C-Mroute, g - Sent BGP C-Mroute,&lt;BR /&gt;N - Received BGP Shared-Tree Prune, n - BGP C-Mroute suppressed,&lt;BR /&gt;Q - Received BGP S-A Route, q - Sent BGP S-A Route,&lt;BR /&gt;V - RD &amp;amp; Vector, v - Vector, p - PIM Joins on route,&lt;BR /&gt;x - VxLAN group&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner, p - PIM Join&lt;BR /&gt;Timers: Uptime/Expires&lt;BR /&gt;Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 06:47:59/00:02:56, RP 192.168.1.74, flags: SJCL&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: Vlan500, RPF nbr 192.168.227.158&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list:&lt;BR /&gt;Vlan350, Forward/Sparse, 06:47:59/00:02:39&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Router 01&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sh ip mroute&lt;BR /&gt;IP Multicast Routing Table&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,&lt;BR /&gt;L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,&lt;BR /&gt;T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,&lt;BR /&gt;X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,&lt;BR /&gt;U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,&lt;BR /&gt;Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,&lt;BR /&gt;Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,&lt;BR /&gt;G - Received BGP C-Mroute, g - Sent BGP C-Mroute,&lt;BR /&gt;N - Received BGP Shared-Tree Prune, n - BGP C-Mroute suppressed,&lt;BR /&gt;Q - Received BGP S-A Route, q - Sent BGP S-A Route,&lt;BR /&gt;V - RD &amp;amp; Vector, v - Vector, p - PIM Joins on route,&lt;BR /&gt;x - VxLAN group&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner, p - PIM Join&lt;BR /&gt;Timers: Uptime/Expires&lt;BR /&gt;Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 06:37:07/00:02:50, RP 192.168.1.74, flags: SP&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: GigabitEthernet0/0/0, RPF nbr 192.168.232.69&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list: Null&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Router 02&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sh ip mroute&lt;BR /&gt;IP Multicast Routing Table&lt;BR /&gt;Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,&lt;BR /&gt;L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,&lt;BR /&gt;T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,&lt;BR /&gt;X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,&lt;BR /&gt;U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,&lt;BR /&gt;Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,&lt;BR /&gt;Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,&lt;BR /&gt;G - Received BGP C-Mroute, g - Sent BGP C-Mroute,&lt;BR /&gt;N - Received BGP Shared-Tree Prune, n - BGP C-Mroute suppressed,&lt;BR /&gt;Q - Received BGP S-A Route, q - Sent BGP S-A Route,&lt;BR /&gt;V - RD &amp;amp; Vector, v - Vector, p - PIM Joins on route,&lt;BR /&gt;x - VxLAN group&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner, p - PIM Join&lt;BR /&gt;Timers: Uptime/Expires&lt;BR /&gt;Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(*, 239.192.0.22), 06:38:07/00:02:45, RP 192.168.1.74, flags: SP&lt;BR /&gt;Incoming interface: GigabitEthernet0/0/0, RPF nbr 192.168.232.69, Mroute&lt;BR /&gt;Outgoing interface list: Null&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot see a route to 239.192.0.22 in Switch Stack 01 despite addig the RP config to 192.168.1.74...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Switch Stack 01&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sh ip mroute 239.192.0.22&lt;BR /&gt;Group 239.192.0.22 not found&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 21:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162375#M340521</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T21:01:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162497#M340532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/189339"&gt;@conor.maton&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yes now the output of show ip mroute from Core Switch1, R1 and R2 look like better all of them know the RP address.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Group is pruned meaning that there is no receiver interested in this group.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you would need a receiver for troubleshooting purposes only on the user facing interface on R2 you could add in interface mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip igmp join-group 239.192.0.22&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Warning: this command causes the router to process packets with destination the multicast group so it shouldn't be used when a real source with a high volume stream like a video is present in the network,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;About the fact the route is missing on the stack 02 I have to review your topology. what is behind stack 02 the possible source?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Edit:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the stack02 is behind the firewall have you configured the IP PIM RP address also on the firewall ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note: understand that this forum is worldwide and we can live in different time zones for example I live in Europe with the same time of Rome, Paris and Berlin. if you use the @ name I receive a notification and a notification e-mail.. This is handy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4162497#M340532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07T06:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multicast Routing Not Working End to End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4166990#M340877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325924"&gt;@Giuseppe Larosa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can confirm I now have multicast end to end. I solved as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Changed from HSRP to OSPF so more like a traditional campus network&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Manually configured 'ip pim rp-address 192.168.1.74' to each L3 device&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help with this!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:31:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/multicast-routing-not-working-end-to-end/m-p/4166990#M340877</guid>
      <dc:creator>conor.maton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-14T19:31:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

