<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches in Routing</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521536#M360076</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1290871"&gt;@Gip&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:
&lt;P&gt;At the moment only 2 VLAN exists on each switch, VLAN 1 and VLAN 2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is viable also, You can have multiple switches layer 3 routing in fact what you mention above could relate with a routed access layer design in which no vlan is extended to another switch and all communication from host/access switch and distribution/.core is done at layer3 , no spanning-tree to contend with?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-20T11:28:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521251#M360059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I'm trying to figure out how I should configure my two L3 switches in order to have interVlan routing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment only 2 VLAN exists on each switch, VLAN 1 and VLAN 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The two switches are connected by trunking and hosts within each VLAN can communicate even when connected on different switches, so it's all good from this point of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then started configuring InterVlan routing by enabling ip routing, creating a SVI for each Vlan (interface vlan 1 already existed by default) to use as vlan gateway and setting up the default route toward the interface with Internet connectivity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem I'm having is that when I do the same on the second switch, I cannot use the same ip addresses for the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SVI interfaces otherwise it will conflict with the SVI of the other switch, so now I'm wondering, do I need to create the SVI on the second switches or its hosts will use the first switch SVI as their gateway? If instead I should create the SVI, is it OK to use a different ip address and have therefore two gateways in each VLAN? and finally, should I replicate the same access lists and default route on the second switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope my questions make sense!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521251#M360059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gip</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-19T21:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521257#M360062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;are both switches supposed to be configured as layer 3 switches, or just one ? A switch with ip routing enabled essentially becomes a router. You need one SVI on both switches to connect, then you need different subnets on the Vlans connected to the switch (since you cannot do NAT with a switch). So basically the configs would look like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Switch 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip routing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;description Link to Switch 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Switch 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip routing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;description Link to Switch 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 3&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521257#M360062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-19T21:46:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521264#M360065</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok I see it now, thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think I need both switches configured as layer 3 since it's the same vlans configured on both, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your example both have ip routing enabled cause vlan 3 is not known to switch 1 and vlan 2 is not on switch 2,correct?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 22:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521264#M360065</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gip</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-19T22:17:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521286#M360068</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1290871"&gt;@Gip&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think I need both switches configured as layer 3 since it's the same vlans configured on both, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well that’s up to you and if you have a need to have gateway resiliency for your vlan users, if you do then you chould have L3 svi addressing on both L3 switches running a FHRP such as HSRP, this way either switch will have a specific ip address in the same vlan and also share a "Virtual" ip address so that you end users will use for their default gateway, if either svi interface faile then user won’t lose connectivity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;example:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;U&gt;sw1&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 ip address 192.168.1.254&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 priority 115&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 3&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;standby 3 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;standby 3 ip address 192.168.3.254&lt;BR /&gt;standby 3 priority 115&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;etc..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;sw2&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;standby 1 ip address 192.168.1.254&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan 3&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;standby 3 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;standby 3 ip address 192.168.3.254&lt;BR /&gt;etc..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521286#M360068</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-19T23:46:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521463#M360071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;In your example both have ip routing enabled cause vlan 3 is not known to switch 1 and vlan 2 is not on switch 2,correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not really sure what you mean by that. A layer 3 switch with 'ip routing' enabled essentially becomes a router. In order to accomplish the inter-Vlan routing, you need just one of the switches to be a layer 3 switch. The configs would look something like below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Switch 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip routing&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;description Link to Switch 2&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Vlan 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Vlan 2&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Vlan 3&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Switch 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;description Link to Switch 1&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;description Link to PC_1&lt;BR /&gt;switchport mode access&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/2&lt;BR /&gt;description Link to PC_2&lt;BR /&gt;switchmode mode access&lt;BR /&gt;switchport access vlan 2&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;BR /&gt;description Link to PC_3&lt;BR /&gt;switchmode mode access&lt;BR /&gt;switchport access vlan 3&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521463#M360071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T08:31:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: InterVlan routing on two L3 Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521536#M360076</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1290871"&gt;@Gip&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:
&lt;P&gt;At the moment only 2 VLAN exists on each switch, VLAN 1 and VLAN 2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is viable also, You can have multiple switches layer 3 routing in fact what you mention above could relate with a routed access layer design in which no vlan is extended to another switch and all communication from host/access switch and distribution/.core is done at layer3 , no spanning-tree to contend with?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/intervlan-routing-on-two-l3-switches/m-p/4521536#M360076</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T11:28:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

