<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871098#M386154</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Glad to hear that the issue is resolved&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is due to the default behavior with the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp VPNv4 session in IOS-XR&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;which is to generate an&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;implicit-null&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;label for the remote ASBR. When eBGP multi hop is used between the ASBRs, this label overrides the one learnt via LDP, which causes traffic to be black holed. The&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;mpls&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;keyword is required in this specific scenario to prevent the implicit-null label to override the LDP label (or BGP-LU label).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 06:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-12T06:11:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870124#M386071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have faced routing issue with&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;bgp&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;We can see&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;vrf routes&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;which learns from&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp peer&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Routes installed in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;vrf routing&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;table but ping is fail. between&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp peers&amp;nbsp; runs ISIS as IGP&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Between&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp peers&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have one node and it is runs as transit role. in this transit routers have isis and mpls. remote&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp peer learns vrf router&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;from&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ibgp peer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We can see&amp;nbsp; routes in both side. Everthing seems normally but ping is fail&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Simple topology have attached&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="photo_5274073295660108832_y.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189791iD5ECF90E28CD1500/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="photo_5274073295660108832_y.jpg" alt="photo_5274073295660108832_y.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2023-07-08 162346.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189792iA2103BEC00026AF4/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2023-07-08 162346.png" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-08 162346.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870124#M386071</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:15:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870127#M386072</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;CE-PE-P-PE-CE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;you want to ping from&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;PE to CE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;?&lt;BR /&gt;if Yes&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;use ping vrf x.x.x.x source interface/IP &amp;lt;PE IP in same VRF&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:07:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870127#M386072</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T09:07:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870130#M386073</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please add source to your ping test.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2023 13:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870130#M386073</guid>
      <dc:creator>M02@rt37</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-08T13:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870134#M386074</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks . Yes i try to ping from PE to PE and to CE like&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ping vrf azercell x.x.x.x source interface xxx&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But resul is same. ping is unreachible&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot _ping.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189790i56C711179DE3F019/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot _ping.png" alt="Screenshot _ping.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870134#M386074</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:20:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870135#M386075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i am also try this method. ping from source&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt; ip.add.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can see&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;source ip add in remote side&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe issus is releated&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;mpls and bgp&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;configuration. I write simple&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;vpn4 bgp cfg&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe we have to add extra attribute&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870135#M386075</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870136#M386076</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;show ip route vrf azercell 10.130.73.73 &lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;share this please&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:21:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870136#M386076</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:21:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870149#M386078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ElshanMammadli5597_0-1688824849074.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189796i77F4EABBBFB09967/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ElshanMammadli5597_0-1688824849074.png" alt="ElshanMammadli5597_0-1688824849074.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2023 14:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870149#M386078</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-08T14:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870157#M386080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the destination in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;RIB VRF&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;that OK&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;NOW let check label for this&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;prefix&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;show ip bgp vpnv4 &lt;SPAN&gt;vrf azercell 10.130.73.73&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:24:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870157#M386080</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:24:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870159#M386081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;OS is XR&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;in router. the command&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;sintaksis&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is not same but similar&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2023-07-08 183117.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189798iFE7D0BB013C8AF7B/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2023-07-08 183117.png" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-08 183117.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870159#M386081</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870190#M386085</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;this simple lab, I test&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ping from PE to CE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;same issue as yours and&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ping from CE to CE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is success.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;in my lab I know exactly what happened, I dont&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;redistribute&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;connect into routing protocol (&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;VRF&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;aware).&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;show ip bgp vpnv4 all&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;only display route for&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;CE's not prefix for connect PE-CE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;with&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;redistribute&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;connect then I start to appear&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot (913).png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189801iE78083B048BE0FE8/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot (913).png" alt="Screenshot (913).png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot (914).png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189802i3BAC367502920B2A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot (914).png" alt="Screenshot (914).png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870190#M386085</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:42:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870274#M386095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It could be that the end to end LSP is not setup properly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;NCS55A2&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can you perform the following command to verify whether you have a functioning end to end LSP or not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ping mpls ipv4 10.79.32.130/32 source 172.20.19.17&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And from the ASR920:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ping mpls ipv4 172.20.19.17/32 source 10.79.32.130&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, I see all the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;VPNv4 prefixes on the NCS55A2 with a next hop of 10.79.32.102&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is incorrect and breaks the end to end LSP. You should use the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;next-hop&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;unchanged when you announce the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;VPNv4 prefixes&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;from the middle router&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;(Remote N540L) to the NCS55A2&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870274#M386095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:52:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870345#M386100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Mr Harold Ritter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for detailed information.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2023-07-09 122828.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189858iA17391D6EFCFE901/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2023-07-09 122828.png" alt="Screenshot 2023-07-09 122828.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our topology run two&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;igp&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;protocols. Between&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;NCS55A2&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and Remote runs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ISIS and runs OSPD&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;from Remote&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;N540 direction ASR920. So NCS55A2 dont know 10.79.32.130&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have to&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;redistrubute isis to ospf&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and back to see each other.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:56:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870345#M386100</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:56:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870361#M386102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;sorry I forget to attach this photo&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;the ping success after I add&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;redistribute connect in PE R1&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot (916).png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189868iCA8670B67264A012/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot (916).png" alt="Screenshot (916).png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870361#M386102</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T05:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870415#M386109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I forgot to mention that you need to configure&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;mpls oam&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;on all the routers in order to run the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ping mpls&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please make the change on all routers and retry the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ping mpls&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;command.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have to&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;redistrubute isis to ospf&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and back to see each other.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is expected. When I mentioned that you needed to have an end to end LSP, it didn't mean having one end to end IGP.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Did you also change the configuration on the middle router&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;(Remote N540L)&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to use the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;next-hop-unchanged&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;under the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;address-family vpnv4&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;as follow:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;router bgp 65030&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;neighbor 172.20.19.17&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;address-family vpnv4 unicast&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;next-hop-unchanged&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 06:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870415#M386109</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T06:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870647#M386132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326042"&gt;@Harold Ritter&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;mpls oam&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have configured end to end. I have also added&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;next-hop-unchanged&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But result is same. We have two route which origin is Remote&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;N540L&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i can not ping that ip add also. I think that issue related to AS number&amp;nbsp; or&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;bgp&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;config and middle router . Becasue&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;AS34170&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;is public AS ,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;AS65030&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;is private AS.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.JPG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189934iC55A2964A747A7E3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Capture.JPG" alt="Capture.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture_1.JPG" style="width: 283px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/189933iC587519121C5DF01/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Capture_1.JPG" alt="Capture_1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 06:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870647#M386132</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T06:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870998#M386148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Can you replace&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp-multihop 10 by ebgp-multihop 10 mpls on both NCS55A2 and Remote N540L&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Can you provide the output for&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;show cef vrf azercell 10.22.99.0/24 det from NCS55A2&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 06:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4870998#M386148</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T06:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871021#M386150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326042"&gt;@Harold Ritter&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that the issue resolved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture_1007.JPG" style="width: 298px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/190001iF9B0C5E70CAA5838/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Capture_1007.JPG" alt="Capture_1007.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871021#M386150</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-10T13:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871098#M386154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Glad to hear that the issue is resolved&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is due to the default behavior with the&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;ebgp VPNv4 session in IOS-XR&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;which is to generate an&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;implicit-null&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;label for the remote ASBR. When eBGP multi hop is used between the ASBRs, this label overrides the one learnt via LDP, which causes traffic to be black holed. The&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;mpls&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;keyword is required in this specific scenario to prevent the implicit-null label to override the LDP label (or BGP-LU label).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 06:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871098#M386154</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T06:11:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871186#M386157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326042"&gt;@Harold Ritter&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you professional approach and detailed information.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871186#M386157</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElshanMammadli5597</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-10T16:30:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: eBGP vpnv4 route ping failure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871190#M386158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are very welcome&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1024247"&gt;@ElshanMammadli5597&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and thanks for the feedback&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/ebgp-vpnv4-route-ping-failure/m-p/4871190#M386158</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-10T16:45:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

