<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2 ISP router 2921 in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971668#M392417</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;when ISP1 or 2 fails they switch over to other ISP as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, switching is not necessary. if it’s not possible then it’s not critical&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;But the question already asked before, are you expecting ISP2 connection go via Proxy ? how is this proxy configured in the network ? are you configured manually browser proxy configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, only in browser settings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;Do you consider to use WCCP to redirect traffic to Proxy (based on match criteria as i think of)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;not desirable in this configuration, but it will be the entire thread. In principle, now the temporary solution is between gi0/1 and 10.27.1.0 - this is a squid, through a cascade proxy. There are disadvantages in the form of HTTP traffic, and why would there be an intermediary?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;Do you have rough digram how your network connected what you expecting network flow ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Text only, but you can draw.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;LAN1---&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;_10.0.27.52&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |--Router--|&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ---ISP1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;LAN2--- &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>technicalBRO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-05T13:12:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971343#M392386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;BR /&gt;Please help me with the configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;We have a 2921 router, we need to connect a second ISP with a proxy server.&lt;BR /&gt;There is already one ISP with static addressing 192.168.100.0/28 and two local subnets.&lt;BR /&gt;A second ISP with addressing 10.27.1.5 is connected, followed by a proxy server 10.0.27.52.&lt;BR /&gt;Clients use one ISP, but if we register proxy 10.0.27.52, it should receive Internet from the second ISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Output of the current config:&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;ip nat inside&lt;BR /&gt;ip virtual-reassembly in&lt;BR /&gt;duplex auto&lt;BR /&gt;speed auto&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0.1&lt;BR /&gt;description LAN1&lt;BR /&gt;encapsulation dot1Q 1 native&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 10.0.1.254 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;ip nat inside&lt;BR /&gt;ip virtual-reassembly in&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0.2&lt;BR /&gt;description LAN2&lt;BR /&gt;encapsulation dot1Q 2&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 10.0.2.254 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;ip helper-address 10.0.1.11&lt;BR /&gt;ip virtual-reassembly in&lt;BR /&gt;no cdp enable&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;description TO ISP2&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 10.27.1.5 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;ip nat outside&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/2&lt;BR /&gt;description TO ISP1&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 192.168.100.253 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;ip nat outside&lt;BR /&gt;ip virtual-reassembly in&lt;BR /&gt;duplex auto&lt;BR /&gt;speed auto&lt;BR /&gt;no mop enabled&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Added it and it works and how to write a route map correctly:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 10.0.27.52 255.255.255.255 10.27.1.1 name PROXY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route-map ISP1 permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;match interface GigabitEthernet0/2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route-map ISP2 permit 20&lt;BR /&gt;match ip address inet-proxy-rt&lt;BR /&gt;set ip next-hop 10.27.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 03:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971343#M392386</guid>
      <dc:creator>technicalBRO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T03:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971495#M392400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello !&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Quick question:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Clients use one ISP, but if we register proxy 10.0.27.52, it should receive Internet from the second ISP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does that mean you want your clients to connect to the second ISP only if the proxy server is reachable ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971495#M392400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Georg Pauwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T08:45:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971587#M392408</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You need to use set next hop with verify option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Verify proxy if reachable then send to proxy if not the pbr will use rib to forward traffic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 11:02:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971587#M392408</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T11:02:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971610#M392410</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One pool of clients will go to one provider, the other through a proxy. But if one of the Internets does not work, another pool of clients can use the backup one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 12:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971610#M392410</guid>
      <dc:creator>technicalBRO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T12:02:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971611#M392411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please help me do this correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried this article, but it doesn't work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/two-isp-two-networks-one-router/td-p/2189915" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/two-isp-two-networks-one-router/td-p/2189915&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 12:05:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971611#M392411</guid>
      <dc:creator>technicalBRO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T12:05:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971622#M392413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The mentioned thread works. if you have 2 ISP, each Subnet used ISP 1 and other one use ISP2 here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;when ISP1 or 2 fails they switch over to other ISP as expected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the question already asked before, are you expecting ISP2 connection go via Proxy&amp;nbsp; ? how is this proxy configured in the network ? are you configured manually browser proxy configured.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you consider&amp;nbsp; to use WCCP to redirect traffic to Proxy (based on match criteria as i think of)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have rough digram how your network connected what you expecting network flow ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 12:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971622#M392413</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T12:22:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971668#M392417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;when ISP1 or 2 fails they switch over to other ISP as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, switching is not necessary. if it’s not possible then it’s not critical&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;But the question already asked before, are you expecting ISP2 connection go via Proxy ? how is this proxy configured in the network ? are you configured manually browser proxy configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, only in browser settings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;Do you consider to use WCCP to redirect traffic to Proxy (based on match criteria as i think of)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;not desirable in this configuration, but it will be the entire thread. In principle, now the temporary solution is between gi0/1 and 10.27.1.0 - this is a squid, through a cascade proxy. There are disadvantages in the form of HTTP traffic, and why would there be an intermediary?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt;Do you have rough digram how your network connected what you expecting network flow ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Text only, but you can draw.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;LAN1---&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;_10.0.27.52&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |--Router--|&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ---ISP1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;LAN2--- &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971668#M392417</guid>
      <dc:creator>technicalBRO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T13:12:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971688#M392419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It easy'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ip access list extended pool1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Permit ip pool1 any&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Route-map ISP2&amp;nbsp; permit 10&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Match ip address pool2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Set ip next-hop verify proxy-ip&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 isp1 track1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 isp2 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That it&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:41:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971688#M392419</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T13:41:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2 ISP router 2921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971723#M392424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, only in browser settings&amp;nbsp; - if you have routing and NATing in place. that should work for that subnet ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is squid in explicit or tranparent proxy ? use single interface or multi interface setup ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can also configure on squid to use other ISP if you like to (in case of failures)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/2-isp-router-2921/m-p/4971723#M392424</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T14:22:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

