<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PBR/route maps in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766814#M51373</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm running into a weird situation here or at least I think I'm but anyways here is the situation.  I have static route that points to a network called SNET and that is where the 168.162.128.0 subnet is being learned from, also I have a PBR that I have in place that states an anything coming from the 10.255.183.0 subnet that wants to hit the 168.162.128.0 will be routed over my BGP router to a new work that is called VMNET. So when I start advertising the 168.162.128.0 subnet via the bgp router the PBR works and I can hit the 168.162.128.0 subnet without issues the problem is all my other subnet chooses that route as well even though I have a static route pointing to the SNET connection for some reason they all want to go over the BGP route. I would pronbably need to paste my settings so if anyone can help let me know and I will send it to you.  Thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 02:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wgranada1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-04T02:18:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBR/route maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766814#M51373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm running into a weird situation here or at least I think I'm but anyways here is the situation.  I have static route that points to a network called SNET and that is where the 168.162.128.0 subnet is being learned from, also I have a PBR that I have in place that states an anything coming from the 10.255.183.0 subnet that wants to hit the 168.162.128.0 will be routed over my BGP router to a new work that is called VMNET. So when I start advertising the 168.162.128.0 subnet via the bgp router the PBR works and I can hit the 168.162.128.0 subnet without issues the problem is all my other subnet chooses that route as well even though I have a static route pointing to the SNET connection for some reason they all want to go over the BGP route. I would pronbably need to paste my settings so if anyone can help let me know and I will send it to you.  Thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 02:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766814#M51373</guid>
      <dc:creator>wgranada1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-04T02:18:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR/route maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766815#M51374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you post configs and topology of your network, it will be most helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the BGP routes have a longer mask than your static routes and that's the reason is choosing that path over the SNET connection ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766815#M51374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edison Ortiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-13T17:17:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR/route maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766816#M51375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You know you I think you are right cause when it is advertised via SNET it is a /23 subnet and when it is being advertised via the BGP it is being advertised as a /24.  So even though the SNET connection is a static route the BGP route will win cause it is longer. So if I get the BGP route to advertise a /23 instead of a /24 then my route map should work.  Here is the config I have for my route map&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766816#M51375</guid>
      <dc:creator>wgranada1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-13T17:52:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR/route maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766817#M51376</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry hit send to fast:  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the static route:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 168.162.128.0 255.255.254.0 10.255.192.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and here is the route map information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip prefix-list to-VNET seq 70 permit 10.255.183.0/24 le 32&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip prefix-list from-VNET seq 260 permit 168.162.128.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 100 permit ip 10.255.183.0 0.0.0.255 168.162.128.0 0.0.1.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route-map sfs-inside-filter permit 30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match ip address 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; set ip next-hop 172.19.98.50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip access-list extended sfs-to-vnet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;141 permit ip 10.255.183.0 0.0.0.255 168.162.128.0 0.0.1.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what you are saying about the length is correct the static route is a /23 while the bgp route is a /24 so that is probably why when I activate this everything is taking the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BGP route &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766817#M51376</guid>
      <dc:creator>wgranada1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-13T17:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR/route maps</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766818#M51377</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The easier solution would be creating two /24 static routes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/pbr-route-maps/m-p/766818#M51377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edison Ortiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-13T21:15:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

