<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Qos policy in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785230#M54084</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Djule2804</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-11T11:16:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Qos policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785226#M54080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I must build a QoS policy on network having different sort of trafic such as real time trafic, best effort trafic...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My test plan is formed by LAN1 which is linked by SWITCH1 to ROUTER1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ROUTEUR1 is linked to ROUTEUR2 and ROUTER2 is linked to LAN2 by SWITCH2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should have congestion point on link bounding ROUTER1 and ROUTER2 (wan).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is : Should I shape or police trafic on switchs to avoid to create congestion point on wan link?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between use of policing, shaping and use of congestion avoidance mechanism such as WRED or RED?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which mechanisms are used in pratice and on which sort of traffic? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 01:22:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785226#M54080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djule2804</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-04T01:22:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Qos policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785227#M54081</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the best way to learn these things is by reading the whitepapers on the cisco website. There are many and they will answers all your questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway in short, if the router with wan interface is configured correctly, there is no need that you do anything on the switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mechanism that I suggest in practice is a strict priority (LLQ) for voice traffic on wan links, and nothing else. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785227#M54081</guid>
      <dc:creator>paolo bevilacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-11T09:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Qos policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785228#M54082</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually, i'm studing all the white paper published by cisco to elaborate my strategy and i thought to apply a QoS policy on the switch to have a flow-based policy with finer granularity than on the routeur.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i drop real time trafic excess, all real time trafic flows can be affected whereas the excess would come from a single flow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, it may be more judicious to drop excess trafic coming from this single flow. Is it possible to build this policy on the switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785228#M54082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djule2804</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-11T10:47:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Qos policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785229#M54083</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In practice, the switch does not see congestion and will not drop traffic. The QoS configuration must be done on the point of congestion, that is WAN interface on the router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785229#M54083</guid>
      <dc:creator>paolo bevilacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-11T11:13:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Qos policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785230#M54084</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/qos-policy/m-p/785230#M54084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djule2804</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-11T11:16:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

