<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Frame Relay End-to-End in Routing and SD-WAN</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885998#M68305</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The above mentioned config will work fine without any issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nagendra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nagendra Kumar Nainar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-23T10:36:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885994#M68301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm configuring End-to-End keepalive for two frame relay ends.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The config at the both ends as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;map-class frame-relay test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface serial 0/0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;frame-relay class test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HDQ-R2#show frame-relay end-to-end keepalive &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;End-to-end Keepalive Statistics for Interface Serial0/0/0 (Frame Relay DTE)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DLCI = 108, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, VC STATUS = ACTIVE (EEK UP)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SEND SIDE STATISTICS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Send Sequence Number: 21,       Receive Sequence Number: 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configured Event Window: 3,     Configured Error Threshold: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Observed Events: 24,      Total Observed Errors: 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Monitored Events: 3,            Monitored Errors: 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Successive Successes: 3,        End-to-end VC Status: UP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RECEIVE SIDE STATISTICS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Send Sequence Number: 21,       Receive Sequence Number: 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configured Event Window: 3,     Configured Error Threshold: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Observed Events: 23,      Total Observed Errors: 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Monitored Events: 3,            Monitored Errors: 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Successive Successes: 3,        End-to-end VC Status: UP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question, when i shutdown one of the both ends, the other end interface status is still UP UP, why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abd Alqader &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885994#M68301</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-04T03:17:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885995#M68302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;--edit: sorry posted in wrong thread, please delete this post--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885995#M68302</guid>
      <dc:creator>bangkydotnet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T09:40:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885996#M68303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you set it up at both ends? If one end is birdirectional, then the other end must be too.  The symtom you are describing sounds as if you have bidirectional on this end and passive-reply at the other end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cr/hwan_r/wan_f1h.htm#wp1072196" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cr/hwan_r/wan_f1h.htm#wp1072196&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I presume these DLCI are on the physical interface, and the frame-relay class is also on the physical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin Dorrell&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luxembourg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885996#M68303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Dorrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T09:47:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885997#M68304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ends are with bidirectional.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Serial0/0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 192.168.1.122 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encapsulation frame-relay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay class test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay interface-dlci 108&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay lmi-type ansi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;end&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;map-class frame-relay test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other end:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Serial0/0/0.108 point-to-point&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 192.168.1.121 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay class test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay interface-dlci 108   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  load-interval 30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;end&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;map-class frame-relay test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the two ends is not a physical interface. Does is it work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885997#M68304</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T10:01:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885998#M68305</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The above mentioned config will work fine without any issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nagendra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885998#M68305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nagendra Kumar Nainar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T10:36:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885999#M68306</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why when one of the two ends is down, the other end stills UP, UP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abd Alqader &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:39:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/885999#M68306</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T10:39:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886000#M68307</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please configure the end that is using main interface, with a  subinterface just like the other one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886000#M68307</guid>
      <dc:creator>paolo bevilacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T10:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886001#M68308</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When end A is down, end B is still up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If end B is down, is end A still up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you get diffreent results in different directions, which end is which?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin Dorrell&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luxembourg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886001#M68308</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Dorrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-23T11:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886002#M68309</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kevin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, when A is shut down, B is still UP. and vise versa!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By the way, i solved this issue by enabling the dynamic routing protocol btw. the two ends EIGRP. and route the traffic to loop back interface "advertsied" to the other end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if you have any comments about keep alive it will be helpful since i need also to know what is the problem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abd Alqader&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886002#M68309</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-27T06:52:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886003#M68310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I mentioned before, please use only point-to-point subinterface to configure this feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886003#M68310</guid>
      <dc:creator>paolo bevilacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-27T07:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886004#M68311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Point-to-Point subinterfaces from the both sides?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886004#M68311</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-27T07:47:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Relay End-to-End</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886005#M68312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. Beside end-to-end keepalives, you should not have one side configure on main interface (that with FR becomes multipoint implicitly).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let us know and don't forget to rate useful posts!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing-and-sd-wan/frame-relay-end-to-end/m-p/886005#M68312</guid>
      <dc:creator>paolo bevilacqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-27T12:55:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

