topic Re: QoS question in Switching

QoS question

nelsonm — Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:50:38 GMT

To all,

I am looking at possibly implementing QoS for a hosted Exchange service. Our internet pipe is currently being over-utilized so I want to guarantee this app/service, as well as VPN/ESP/IPSec gets priority over everything else. I am looking for overall design suggestions and specifically, where should I place the policy-map?? See Attachment.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!!

Re: QoS question

mattwilsonuk — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:22:34 GMT

Looking at the diagram, your bottleneck is on the egress ports to your provider. Are you able to access these devices?

Policies should be applied here outbound.

If not you will need to perform throttling further inline so that you can apply you policies earlier.

Mark your traffic at the access layer and verify these markings are still in place on both your perimeter routers.

Do you use both links to access the exchange service or use a PBR to determine a particular link?

Re: QoS question

Lucien Avramov — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:34:42 GMT

On your diagram, it seems right, you should apply the qos on the gateway routers on the outgoing traffic.

You can use class maps and match the different types of traffics for example.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/12_4/qos_12_4_book.html

Re: QoS question

Joseph W. Doherty — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:21:31 GMT

QoS methods generally well support service guarantees at points of egress congestion. Since you note "Our internet pipe is currently being over-utilized . . .", two issues you might have are whether there's sufficient bandwidth to guarantee the level of service that's needed for your Exchange and VPN/ESP/IPSec traffic and whether you can use QoS for your inbound (i.e. ISP egress) Internet traffic.

Re: QoS question

nelsonm — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:21:12 GMT

Matt,

Thank you for the response. We own both perimeter routers so, yes I have access. I plan to use both links, but I can do some PBR off the fatpipe to force out 1 link or the other. Is there are reason you ask? Thanks again for your input.

Re: QoS question

nelsonm — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:27:52 GMT

Thanks lavramov! I believe this will come in quite useful in the coming weeks.

Re: QoS question

wilson_1234_2 — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:35:17 GMT

I have a question about this post here,

My understanding is that the QoS policy gets dropped once the traffic traverses the Internet, where there is no controll or classes defined.

Is this not so?

Re: QoS question

Lucien Avramov — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:53:51 GMT

QoS is local to the router, once the traffic has been sent, it's no longer involved, one thing you can do is set DSCP bit.

Re: QoS question

wilson_1234_2 — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:37:38 GMT

Thanks,

That was my understanding.

With that being said, how does the policy help him with prioritizing the traffic he wants to prioritize?

Is this assuming the provider is classifying traffic for QoS purposes?