<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3750-X replacement for the old WS-C3750G-12S? in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499910#M146776</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about a 4900M?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Supports 10Gb, can add modules of 20 way 1GbE copper, dual power, does EIGRP stub with std license ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Might be worth a look&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ian.vaughan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-23T13:47:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3750-X replacement for the old WS-C3750G-12S?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499908#M146774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are using a few 3750G-12S switches in the distribution layer, all fine and dandy &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it's getting a bit old, and I would like 10Ge uplinks, dual power and a few more ports in the switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That brings me to the question: Any rumors of a 3750-X series SFP-based switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It could be a 24 (or 48) port SFP + Network Module or maybe a 1RU 3750-X with room for 4-5 Network modules. That would give a great flexibility allowing 10Ge also downstream to a few selected access-layer switches with high bandwidth demand.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tommy V&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 20:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499908#M146774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tommy Vindvik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T20:10:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3750-X replacement for the old WS-C3750G-12S?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499909#M146775</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tommy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even the new 3750x or 3560x do not come with 24 or 48 port SFPs.&amp;nbsp; They all come with 24 or 48 port 10/100/1000 and a couple of 10Gig or 4 1Gig SFPs for uplinks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is not really that much of demand for access layer switches with 24 or 48 port Gig SFPs.&amp;nbsp; If your end users workstations have Fiber NICs then you will need to use a media converter or chassis based device i.e. 4500, 6500 with 24 or 48 port SFP blades.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reza&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499909#M146775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reza Sharifi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-23T13:14:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3750-X replacement for the old WS-C3750G-12S?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499910#M146776</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about a 4900M?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Supports 10Gb, can add modules of 20 way 1GbE copper, dual power, does EIGRP stub with std license ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Might be worth a look&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499910#M146776</guid>
      <dc:creator>ian.vaughan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-23T13:47:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3750-X replacement for the old WS-C3750G-12S?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499911#M146777</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;WS-C3560E-12D has 12 X2 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can connect one or more of the 10Gb to the 3750X.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WS-C3560E-12D is also cheaper than the 4900M and being an "E" it should support dual power supplies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/3750-x-replacement-for-the-old-ws-c3750g-12s/m-p/1499911#M146777</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-25T22:50:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

