<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Glbp, helper-address and dhcpd in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608084#M162596</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is working the way it is supposed to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A VIP( Virtual IP) is not&amp;nbsp; a real physical device so it won't ever do what you desire.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do you want this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cadet alain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-23T14:33:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Glbp, helper-address and dhcpd</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608083#M162595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Hi guys, I hope this is the right place to post, I'm a newbee in this forum.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;My problem is as follows:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;I have two 6504 core routers and they both have a connection to an access switch&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;R1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; R2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;|&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt; |&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SW&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;The vlan that I use is 260. The two vlan 260 interfaces on my R1 and R2 are running glbp. All this works like a charm. Now the problem is that I have a DHCP server on another LAN segment and I want this DHCP server to serve my clients (Alcatel IP Phones) connected to my SW. So I have added a helper-address to the interface that sends the request on to my DHCP server. The issue is that when these requests show up at the DHCP server, they do not have the virtual ip of the two interfaces but the physical. This results in my DHCP server is trying to send the DHCPOFFER package back to the wrong IP address, nemely the physical.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;The two confs on R1 and R2:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;R1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; description *** VOIP ***&lt;BR /&gt; ip vrf forwarding voip&lt;BR /&gt; ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.162 255.255.255.224&lt;BR /&gt; ip helper-address YYY.YYY.YYY.189&lt;BR /&gt; no ip redirects&lt;BR /&gt; no ip proxy-arp&lt;BR /&gt; glbp 2 ip XXX.XXX.XXX..161&lt;BR /&gt; glbp 2 priority 105&lt;BR /&gt; glbp 2 preempt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; description *** VOIP ***&lt;BR /&gt; ip vrf forwarding voip&lt;BR /&gt; ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.163 255.255.255.224&lt;BR /&gt; ip helper-address YYY.YYY.YYY.189&lt;BR /&gt; no ip redirects&lt;BR /&gt; no ip proxy-arp&lt;BR /&gt; glbp 2 ip XXX.XXX.XXX..161&lt;BR /&gt; glbp 2 priority 95&lt;BR /&gt; glbp 2 preempt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On my CentOS 5.5 linux where the dhcpd server is installed i get the following when using tcpdump&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tcpdump -lenv -s 1500 port bootps or bootpc -i eth0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;11:08:07.865671 00:26:cb:31:00:00 &amp;gt; 00:25:90:0b:34:62, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 355: (tos 0x0, ttl 254, id 60618, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 341) XXX.XXX.XXX.162 bootps &amp;gt; YYY.YYY.YYY.189.bootps: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:80:9f:91:be:ea, length: 313, hops:1, xid:0x66dac1ae, secs:27, flags: [none]&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gateway IP: &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff6600;"&gt;XXX.XXX.XXX.162&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Client Ethernet Address: 00:80:9f:91:be:ea&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Vendor-rfc1048:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; DHCP:DISCOVER&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VO:58.2.255.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PR:SM+DG+BR+VO+RN+RB&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; HN:"ALCATEL-iptouch-00809f91beea"&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VC:"alcatel.noe.0"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here I can see that the Gateway IP on the incomming package is not the virtual which should be XXX.XXX.XXX.161&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 23:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608083#M162595</guid>
      <dc:creator>dong_madsn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T23:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Glbp, helper-address and dhcpd</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608084#M162596</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is working the way it is supposed to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A VIP( Virtual IP) is not&amp;nbsp; a real physical device so it won't ever do what you desire.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do you want this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608084#M162596</guid>
      <dc:creator>cadet alain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-23T14:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Glbp, helper-address and dhcpd</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608085#M162597</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm okay, well my reason for wanting the VIP to be the one that I see coming from the inter&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;face is that if, that interface (162) goes down then my DHCP server is replying to an address which is not working anymore . My idea was that if the gateway was 161 then the DHCP server would always be able to answer the request. But okay if it is working the way it is supposed to, then I'm happy &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; Thanks for posting back by the way!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608085#M162597</guid>
      <dc:creator>dong_madsn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-23T16:14:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Glbp, helper-address and dhcpd</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608086#M162598</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think in this example, if the .162 interface goes down, then DHCP requests would start to come from the .163 interface and tyhe DHCP server would simply start to respond to this address instead. It should all work fine,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jonathan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608086#M162598</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathanaxford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-23T17:10:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Glbp, helper-address and dhcpd</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608087#M162599</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you are right, it is excatly what happens, thanks for helping understand this!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/glbp-helper-address-and-dhcpd/m-p/1608087#M162599</guid>
      <dc:creator>dong_madsn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-25T08:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

