<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294858#M267345</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My VSS cluster is connected to 2 Nexus 5548P (VPC) (&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Port-channel13)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Now I've changed mac address-table aging to 14400 for vlan 125 and everything is ok, but for me, this is not normal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;I'll check later when I've more time...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Thynk you guys&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pboegli77</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-27T13:21:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294855#M267342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've two 4500X configured in VSS mode and I use it as my main gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I try to ping 192.168.125.247 (vlan 125) from a machine in vlan 120 (192.168.120.164 / 255.255.254.0 / 192.168.120.254 ) and the ping is not working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 4500X cluster is the gateway for these two vlans :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan120&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 192.168.120.252 255.255.254.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby version 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby 1 ip 192.168.120.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby 1 priority 110&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby 1 preempt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan125&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 192.168.125.252 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby version 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby 1 ip 192.168.125.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby 1 priority 110&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; standby 1 preempt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see an arp entry in the 4500X :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gw01#sh arp 192.168.125.247&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Protocol&amp;nbsp; Address&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Age (min)&amp;nbsp; Hardware Addr&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Type&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internet&amp;nbsp; 192.168.125.247&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 32&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 00e0.8615.8775&amp;nbsp; ARPA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Vlan125&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mac address is correct but I can not see it in the mac address-table :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gw01#sh mac address-table address&amp;nbsp; 00e0.8615.8775&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No entries present.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if I try this command on my 4500X, it's working :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gw01#ping 192.168.125.247 source 192.168.120.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type escape sequence to abort.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.125.247, timeout is 2 seconds:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.120.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/11/36 ms&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I can see the mac in the address-table :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gw01a#sh mac address-table address&amp;nbsp; 00e0.8615.8775&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unicast Entries&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; vlan&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; mac address&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; type&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; protocols&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; port&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------+---------------+--------+---------------------+-------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 125&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 00e0.8615.8775&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dynamic ip,ipx,assigned,other Port-channel13&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I can also ping from my machine in vlan 120 but a&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;fter 5 minutes, this entry will disapear and I will not be able to ping it from my machine in the vlan 120.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;If I clear the arp entry it's also working for 5 minutes...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Any idea ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 23:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294855#M267342</guid>
      <dc:creator>pboegli77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-07T23:05:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294856#M267343</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is due to a diffenrence between the CAM and ARP aging timer. Default ARP is 4 hours, where as CAM is 5 minutes as you point out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try using the 'mac-address-table aging-timer' :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/command/reference/lsw_m1.html#wp1141826"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/command/reference/lsw_m1.html#wp1141826&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...either globaly or per-VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294856#M267343</guid>
      <dc:creator>Seb Rupik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-23T14:33:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294857#M267344</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi, we had a very similiar problem a while back, but with vpc and nexus 7000s. One VLAN, and one VLAN only, certain hosts could not communicate out the subnet. I also picked up clearing the arp table of their entry fixes the problem for about 5 minutes. One 7000 could not ping them at all. TAC had us do packet captures to see where the packets are dropping, and it turned out one 7000 was not forwarding the packets over its peer link. But at the end of the day the problem could only be resolved by an IOS upgrade. They never identified the exact problem or issue, but presumably it was a bug. This just started out of nowhere, no config changes or anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So try tracing where the packets are getting lost. That might help you track the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jacques&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294857#M267344</guid>
      <dc:creator>JACQUES DU PLESSIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-23T14:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294858#M267345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My VSS cluster is connected to 2 Nexus 5548P (VPC) (&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Port-channel13)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Now I've changed mac address-table aging to 14400 for vlan 125 and everything is ok, but for me, this is not normal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;I'll check later when I've more time...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Thynk you guys&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294858#M267345</guid>
      <dc:creator>pboegli77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-27T13:21:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294859#M267346</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think we might have got exactly the same problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is my theory:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The switches are connected via etherchannels&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If you could follow the interface which is followed within the etherchannel, I think the source client is coming in on the first 4500x. The destination client is coming in on the second 4500x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- It is most likely a destination with little network traffic. If it would connect to many other devices (dhcp, ad, dns etc) it will probably also sent a packet to the other interface within the etherchannel, and that solves the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A ping on the 4500x also solves the problem temporarily.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I can not check my theory because o&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;n the VSS 4500 I can not determine the interface which is used within an etherchannel.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;This is important because maybe it only goes wrong when also the path from the 4500x to the source and destination is on a different interface.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294859#M267346</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.waning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-30T09:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294860#M267347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After some tests I had to adjust mij theory:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If a device only sends packets via the interface of an etherchannel to the passive VSS switch, the mac address entry is lost in mac address table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If a ping from a source is via the active 4500x it works. If a ping from a source via the passive 4500x it doesn't come up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To be continued...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294860#M267347</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.waning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-30T10:13:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294861#M267348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's interresting Rudi !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also see this open Caveats for Cisco IOS XE Release :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Packets that are routed on the same Layer 3 interface (or SVI) that entered on are dropped if received on the VSS standby switch.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Workaround: None. &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/cisco/psn/bssprt/bss?searchType=bstbugidsearch&amp;amp;page=bstBugDetail&amp;amp;BugID=CSCub63571" target="_blank"&gt;CSCub63571&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294861#M267348</guid>
      <dc:creator>pboegli77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-04T12:09:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294862#M267349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is the default gateway in the pc (4500 switch or firewall).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are able to ping vlan 125 with source addresss of vlan 120 in 4500 switch,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;try this in your pc in command prompt with admin privilage and check.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route add 192.168.125.252 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.120.252 -p&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294862#M267349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Guru Mysoruu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-04T14:56:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294863#M267350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have done some additional tests:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;New theory:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Packet coming in on the passive switch which can be directly sent to an interface on the passive switch &lt;STRONG&gt;don't update the mac address table&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If incoming packet on the passive switch has destination to lost mac address it is dropped. (prevents flooding)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If incoming packet on the active switch has destination to lost mac address it is sent to all interface (This can be seen via a wireshark pc on the destination vlan. 1 ICMP packet is seen, coming from source to destination ip address.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question is if really no incoming packets on the passive switch updates the mac address table, or that it depends on more variables in the path from source to destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 07:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294863#M267350</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.waning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-05T07:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294864#M267351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe to point which might be relevant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The passive 4500X was completely broken, it was replaced by a new one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- We have an additional module:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 10GE SFP+&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; C4KX-NM-8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if only these interfaces have problems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294864#M267351</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.waning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-05T08:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294865#M267352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem found:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sw4500#sho platform hardware floodset vlan 4 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Executing the command on VSS member switch role = VSS&lt;STRONG&gt; Active, id&lt;/STRONG&gt; = 1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Vlan 4:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unicast Floodset:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; FloodToCpu: - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; RetIndex: 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Po16(848)&amp;nbsp; Po21(853)&amp;nbsp; Po23(855)&amp;nbsp; Po24(856)&amp;nbsp; Po31(863)&amp;nbsp; Po51(883)&amp;nbsp; Po14(846) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Executing the command on VSS member switch role = VSS &lt;STRONG&gt;Standby, id &lt;/STRONG&gt;= 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Vlan 4:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unicast Floodset:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; FloodToCpu: - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; RetIndex: 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PROBLEM NO INTERFACES&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Workaround:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution might be: add port in the specific vlan which triggers that in the portlist above a new port is added.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294865#M267352</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.waning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-10T09:22:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have corrected this issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294866#M267353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have corrected this issue by adding two links between my 4500X Cluster and my two Nexus. Now, each 4500X is connected to each Nexus (So, I've four links in the etherchannel instead of two).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I remove also the following command&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;"&gt;mac address-table aging-time 14400 vlan 125&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;and everything is working.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'courier new', courier, monospace;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;I think that the problem was that some packets had to cross the VSL links between 4500X when I had only two links.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also upgrade the 4500X cluster to version&amp;nbsp;03.04.03.SG&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/2294866#M267353</guid>
      <dc:creator>pboegli77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-19T06:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/3219478#M397315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know this is an old thread but this might help someone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We also had this problem.&amp;nbsp; For us it was a software bug. See here &lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvb78700/?reffering_site=dumpcr" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvb78700/?reffering_site=dumpcr&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Workaround 1 and 2 worked for us however, Cisco recommended an&amp;nbsp; IOS upgrade. Which we will do. I'll post after the upgrade with results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/3219478#M397315</guid>
      <dc:creator>kataan003</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-20T15:08:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/3226922#M398581</link>
      <description>Hi Kataan&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did you do the IOS upgrade yet ? if so which version did Cisco recommend  and what was the outcome of  the upgrade.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 07:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/3226922#M398581</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sauron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-05T07:42:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ping issue / ARP / Mac address table</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/3383670#M414354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Sauron,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not sure if you ever tried anything - but we have had this problem with our 4500X VSS setups.&amp;nbsp; Upgrading to Cisco's recommended release 3.6.7E(MD) has resolved our issues.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 17:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ping-issue-arp-mac-address-table/m-p/3383670#M414354</guid>
      <dc:creator>aaronleech</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-15T17:17:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

