<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic By configuring subinterfaces in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624345#M314364</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;By configuring subinterfaces on the G0/1 of the&amp;nbsp;3834? like that you are tagging the packets leaving the router with VLAN ID 10. Router 2821 doesn't understand the dot1q tag because its interface is configured as a layer 3 interface.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;The solution is to do the same on both ends of the link: either you configure both routers with subinterfaces and vlan 10, or you configure both as layer 3 interfaces.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;So if you want to keep the config on the 3834, you should replicate the comands on the other router:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no ip address 192.168.10.254&amp;nbsp;255.255.255.0&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;encapsulation dot1Q 10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 10.0.10.254&amp;nbsp;255.255.255.0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cosmin.mateescu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-16T15:34:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>trouble with router to router across metro-e configuration - router vlans</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624341#M314360</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a metro-Ethernet service connecting several sites, and we are going to the same topography with a&amp;nbsp; different provider. I am trying to program the hub router (a 3834) to talk across the link to a 2821, both routers running 12.4. The issue I am facing is that if I just use a LAN&amp;nbsp;IP address for the 3834 G0/1 interface (10.0.10.1/24)&amp;nbsp;connected by crossover cable to&amp;nbsp;the 2821 G0/0 interface (10.0.10.254/24) everything works, routing tables understand to route 10.0.10.0/24 traffic across those interfaces, routing protocols work, etc. If I then change the 3834 G0/1 to "no ip address", then create a G0/1.1 VLAN, nothing works. Neither of the routers&amp;nbsp;understand that 10.0.10.0/24 traffic should route to the interfaces. Here is the pertinent part of the 3834 config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;duplex auto&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;speed auto&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;media-type rj45&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;negotiation auto&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;encapsulation dot1Q 10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 10.0.10.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip nat inside&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip virtual-reassembly&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no snmp trap link-status&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And now the pertinent part of the 2821 config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 10.0.10.254 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;duplex auto&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;speed auto&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;duplex auto&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;speed auto&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no mop enabled&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the routing table for the 3484:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FielderNew#sho ip route&lt;BR /&gt;Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Gateway of last resort is not set&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;BR /&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.10.0 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1.10&lt;BR /&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;FielderNew#ping 10.0.10.254&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Type escape sequence to abort.&lt;BR /&gt;Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.10.254, timeout is 2 seconds:&lt;BR /&gt;.....&lt;BR /&gt;Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)&lt;BR /&gt;FielderNew#&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And for the 2821:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FirewheelNew#sho ip route&lt;BR /&gt;Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Gateway of last resort is not set&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets&lt;BR /&gt;C&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10.0.10.0 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0&lt;BR /&gt;FirewheelNew#&lt;BR /&gt;FirewheelNew#ping 10.0.10.1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Type escape sequence to abort.&lt;BR /&gt;Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.10.1, timeout is 2 seconds:&lt;BR /&gt;.....&lt;BR /&gt;Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)&lt;BR /&gt;FirewheelNew#&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been hacking at this for a quite a while, obviously not a network engineer, can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? Many thanks, Brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624341#M314360</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradholman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T06:40:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BradNot sure what a 3834 is</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624342#M314361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure what a 3834 is but if you use a subinterface then it is expecting a tagged packet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if you simply connect the other end to the 2821 and just use a physical interface on the 2800 then there will be no tags.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is a switch in between you could make the connection to the 3834&amp;nbsp;a trunk link allowing vlan 10 and then make the connection to the 2821 an access port in vlan 10 and that would work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically your 3834 is expecting traffic with a vlan tag so either -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) use the switch method above&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) create a corresponding subinterface on your 2821&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624342#M314361</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-16T14:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sorry for the confusion, it's</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624343#M314362</link>
      <description>Sorry for the confusion, it's a 3845, not a 3834...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:03:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624343#M314362</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradholman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-16T15:03:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>no problem :)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624344#M314363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;don't worry &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624344#M314363</guid>
      <dc:creator>cosmin.mateescu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-16T15:20:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By configuring subinterfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624345#M314364</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;By configuring subinterfaces on the G0/1 of the&amp;nbsp;3834? like that you are tagging the packets leaving the router with VLAN ID 10. Router 2821 doesn't understand the dot1q tag because its interface is configured as a layer 3 interface.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;The solution is to do the same on both ends of the link: either you configure both routers with subinterfaces and vlan 10, or you configure both as layer 3 interfaces.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;So if you want to keep the config on the 3834, you should replicate the comands on the other router:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no ip address 192.168.10.254&amp;nbsp;255.255.255.0&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;encapsulation dot1Q 10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 10.0.10.254&amp;nbsp;255.255.255.0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.3999996185303px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624345#M314364</guid>
      <dc:creator>cosmin.mateescu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-16T15:34:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks to everyone, adding</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624346#M314365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks to everyone, adding the equivalent commands to the 2nd router did the trick. Next time I run into this kind of road block I'll make sure to post a question rather than spend weeks beating my head against the wall (but at least I read up a LOT on the subject!).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again, Brad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:46:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/trouble-with-router-to-router-across-metro-e-configuration/m-p/2624346#M314365</guid>
      <dc:creator>bradholman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-16T15:46:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

