<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Rafael, in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799188#M340543</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rafael,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You EIGRP configuration matches the IP of the Po1.804 interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;router eigrp 100&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;address-family ipv4 vrf TESTE_X autonomous-system 100&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; redistribute static&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; network 172.50.0.48 0.0.0.15&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This statement will enable EIGRP process in any interface which got IP in the range 172.50.0.48 to 172.150.0.63. Your port-channel IP falls in this range. Hence it participates in EIGRP process 100.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CF&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:12:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cisco Freak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-06T17:12:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EIGRP question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799185#M340540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've a question about EIGRP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've the topology attached in my environment(just a example), where i have three routers(sometimes two) with HSRP and EIGRP, each router has an ISP connected to the destination, so, we use the HSRP to have hight availability of gateway and EIGRP to route the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is about bandwdt command in EIGRP, i have the config below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Current configuration : 1531 bytes&lt;BR /&gt;ip vrf TESTE_X&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;rd 1:804&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Serial0/2/3&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;bandwidth 64&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip vrf forwarding TESTE_X&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address X.X.X.X&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip accounting output-packets&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip flow monitor FLOW-MONITOR-1 sampler SAMPLER-1 output&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;encapsulation ppp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no cdp enable&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Port-channel1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;hold-queue 150 in&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Port-channel1.804&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;encapsulation dot1Q 804&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip vrf forwarding TESTE_X&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 172.50.0.55 255.255.255.240&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip accounting output-packets&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip flow monitor FLOW-MONITOR-1 sampler SAMPLER-1 input&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;standby 4 ip 172.50.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;standby 4 preempt&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;standby 4 authentication adm4ad&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;router eigrp 100&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;address-family ipv4 vrf TESTE_X autonomous-system 100&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; redistribute static&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; network 172.50.0.48 0.0.0.15&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; passive-interface default&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; no passive-interface Port-channel1.804&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; no eigrp log-neighbor-changes&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;exit-address-family&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;ip route vrf TESTE_X 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.50.0.49 name default-route-to-firewall&lt;BR /&gt;ip route vrf TESTE_X 172.16.254.87 255.255.255.255 10.224.240.2&lt;BR /&gt;ip route vrf TESTE_X 172.16.254.88 255.255.255.255 10.224.240.2 &lt;BR /&gt;ip route vrf TESTE_X 172.16.254.180 255.255.255.255 10.224.240.2 &lt;BR /&gt;ip route vrf TESTE_X172.16.254.184 255.255.255.255 10.224.240.2 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The bandwidth of serial is wrong, currently is 64, but, i need to change to 128.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;will it impact in EIGRP config? Or does not matter because this interface is a passive interface?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rafael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799185#M340540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafael Mendes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T11:18:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Rafael,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799186#M340541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rafael,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to the configuration you have posted, the IP network on the Serial0/2/3 interface is not even added to EIGRP (there is no corresponding &lt;STRONG&gt;network&lt;/STRONG&gt; command in EIGRP). Therefore, to EIGRP, this interface does not even exist - EIGRP ignores it completely. Changing the bandwidth setting on this Serial interface will not affect your EIGRP in any way.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 13:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799186#M340541</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Paluch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-06T13:10:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Peter,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799187#M340542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Peter,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just more one question, my interface that are partiicpating in EIGRP is the interface Port-channel1.804, but, the int don't have the network command.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Look the command below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100) VRF(TESTE_X)&lt;BR /&gt;H&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Address&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Interface&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hold Uptime&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SRTT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RTO&amp;nbsp; Q&amp;nbsp; Seq&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (sec)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (ms)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cnt Num&lt;BR /&gt;0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 172.50.0.59&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Po1.804&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12 4w3d&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 100&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp; 163&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i'm confused...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is because the command "no passive-interface Port-channel1.804"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799187#M340542</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafael Mendes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-06T16:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Rafael,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799188#M340543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rafael,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You EIGRP configuration matches the IP of the Po1.804 interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;router eigrp 100&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;address-family ipv4 vrf TESTE_X autonomous-system 100&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; redistribute static&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; network 172.50.0.48 0.0.0.15&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This statement will enable EIGRP process in any interface which got IP in the range 172.50.0.48 to 172.150.0.63. Your port-channel IP falls in this range. Hence it participates in EIGRP process 100.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CF&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:12:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799188#M340543</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cisco Freak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-06T17:12:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nice! Now i got it!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799189#M340544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nice! Now i got it!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/eigrp-question/m-p/2799189#M340544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafael Mendes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-06T19:41:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

