<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Have a look at this doc with in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066335#M382907</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this doc with examples:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://packetpushers.net/understand-etherchannel-load-balancing-catalyst-switches/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reza Sharifi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-27T16:59:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Source-mac load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066334#M382906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I have a port-channel between to switches, in which there are two trunk members, and my switches are set to use mac-source for their hashing, I know that the same trunk member is used for return traffic to the source device. &amp;nbsp;However, say I have 10&amp;nbsp;workstations on vlan 24, and each workstation will always traverse the same port-channel on the return trip from the destination device. &amp;nbsp;However, will load-balancing with two port-channel members mean that 5 of the source devices always choose member trunk 1 and the other 5 member trunk 2?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:05:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066334#M382906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chad Parish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T17:05:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Have a look at this doc with</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066335#M382907</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this doc with examples:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://packetpushers.net/understand-etherchannel-load-balancing-catalyst-switches/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066335#M382907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reza Sharifi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-27T16:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>. . . I know that the same</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066336#M382908</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;. . . I know that the same trunk member is used for return traffic to the source device.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That depends on if the hashing algorithm being used hashes the same attribute.&amp;nbsp; For example, if outbound traffic to a destination used src-mac, and return traffic used dest-mac, then the same link would be used because the same attribute, i.e. the same MAC, was used used in both directions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;However, will load-balancing with two port-channel members mean that 5 of the source devices always choose member trunk 1 and the other 5 member trunk 2?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, it doesn't.&amp;nbsp; Again, the link used would depend on which link the hash algorithm determined based on the attribute(s) being examined.&amp;nbsp; The algorithm will, though, given the same attribute(s) chose the same link, assuming the number of links is the same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ideally, the hash algorithm being used will equally distribute traffic across all the links in the Etherchannel, but this isn't guaranteed.&amp;nbsp; So, for your 10 devices, the odds of them being equally split across both links might be about the same as all 10 devices using the same link.&amp;nbsp; More likely, there will be some imbalance such as 6 or 7 devices using one link, and the remaining devices the other.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BTW, if just using a single attribute like MAC, from a gateway to multiple devices, you would normally use dest-mac for traffic from gateway to the other hosts, and for the other direction, from hosts to gateway, use src-mac.&amp;nbsp; If the device supports it, you might also use, for such, src-dest-mac for both directions.&amp;nbsp; What you want is some attribute that differs between flows.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/source-mac-load-balancing/m-p/3066336#M382908</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph W. Doherty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-27T21:09:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

