<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue in Switching</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3937026#M474436</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Tested it &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mikael (yourself) were right , have to cable like a VDC (burn a port from each switch module and physically cable them). Ports are autosensing , no crossover needed. Turned spanning tree off and works perfectly. It's one of the things never mentioned in any Datasheet i guess &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again to both of you&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ssg14</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-08T10:46:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936104#M474359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a very strange issue which have spent lots of time and can't find any reason for it. Got a 2901 with below modules:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1) NAME: "4 Port FE Switch on Slot 0 SubSlot 0", DESCR: "4 Port FE Switch"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;PID: HWIC-4ESW , VID: VN/A, SN:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;2) NAME: "WIC/VIC/HWIC 0 Power Daughter Card", DESCR: "4-Port HWIC-ESW Power Daughter Card"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;PID: ILPM-4 , VID: VN/A, SN:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;NAME: "4 Port FE Switch on Slot 0 SubSlot 1", DESCR: "4 Port FE Switch"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;3) PID: HWIC-4ESW , VID: V01 , SN:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Panzer-Router#sh vlan-switch&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;VLAN Name Status Ports&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1 default active Fa0/0/0, Fa0/0/1, Fa0/0/2, Fa0/0/3, Fa0/1/0, Fa0/1/1, Fa0/1/2, Fa0/1/3&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1002 fddi-default act/unsup&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1003 token-ring-default act/unsup&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1004 fddinet-default act/unsup&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1005 trnet-default act/unsup&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All 8 ports of the switch modules are in VLAN1 as per above. My issue is whatever I connect to Fa0/1/x cannot ping the VLAN1 ip. Here is what I have done till now:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Swapped module in slot1(non-working) to working slot 0 test if the switch module 2 is dead , works fine (switch module no issue)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Swapped the&amp;nbsp;the working module in slot0 to slot1 to test if the router mainboard (Slot1) has an issue , works fine(router mainboard seems fine)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Swapped the non-working module in slot1 to slot 2/3 to test (while slot0 present) , doesn't work but when i remove slot0 works!!!!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Swapped working module in slot0 to slot2 or 3 when slot1 present , stops working but slot 1 module starts working... :O)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever I have done , i can't have both working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea? or any test you think i can do to verify? is there a limitation of how many switch modules can be inserted in 29xx?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Samy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936104#M474359</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssg14</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T00:21:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936199#M474368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;they should be able to have 2 wics as per doc below , maybe its the software have you tried a newer version says you need minimum below just in case its that &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="80%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6" border="1"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR valign="top" align="left"&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P class="pChart_subheadCMT" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0pt; text-transform: none; margin: 3pt;"&gt;Cisco 2900 Series&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;
&lt;P class="pChart_bodyCMT" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0pt; text-transform: none; margin: 3pt;"&gt;15.0(1)M: IP Base License of the Universal Image&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/high-speed-wan-interface-cards/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016bf0b.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/high-speed-wan-interface-cards/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016bf0b.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 07:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936199#M474368</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Malone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T07:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936466#M474388</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isn't those module the ones that have to have one physical cross-over-cable connected between one port in each module?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Mikael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 14:40:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936466#M474388</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T14:40:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936491#M474393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is my understanding that &lt;SPAN&gt;Mikael&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;is correct. This router can have 2 switch modules but that the router backplane communicates with only one of the switch modules. For the second module to work it must have one of its ports connected to a port in the other switch module.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:12:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936491#M474393</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T15:12:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936740#M474412</link>
      <description>I'm running the latest version mate 15.4M7 or something</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936740#M474412</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssg14</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T21:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936746#M474413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Richard , that's a bit strange but if i understood correctly this reminds me a VDC inside a 2901 which have to physically run a cable to another VDC...lol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hopefully the ports are auto-sensing so no cross-over needed ,&amp;nbsp; I'll test it tonight and update.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936746#M474413</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssg14</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-07T21:45:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936823#M474416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;auto-sensing would be nice. Hope that is the case. But in any event the important thing is that the second switch module needs to have a port with a cable to a port on the first switch module. If you try a standard Ethernet cable and it works then that is great. But if it does not work then you need to try a cross over.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 00:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3936823#M474416</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-08T00:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2901 Switch Module Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3937026#M474436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tested it &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mikael (yourself) were right , have to cable like a VDC (burn a port from each switch module and physically cable them). Ports are autosensing , no crossover needed. Turned spanning tree off and works perfectly. It's one of the things never mentioned in any Datasheet i guess &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again to both of you&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/2901-switch-module-issue/m-p/3937026#M474436</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssg14</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-08T10:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

