<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k in Server Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034217#M13037</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;trunk vlan 125 is going to our storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;GT-9K-TOP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vlan125 - Group 125 (HSRP-V2) (IPv4)&lt;BR /&gt;Local state is Standby, priority 100 (Cfged 100), may preempt&lt;BR /&gt;Forwarding threshold(for vPC), lower: 0 upper: 100&lt;BR /&gt;Hellotime 3 sec, holdtime 10 sec&lt;BR /&gt;Next hello sent in 0.201000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual IP address is 10.20.125.1 (Cfged)&lt;BR /&gt;Active router is 10.20.125.4, priority 100 expires in 7.960000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Standby router is local&lt;BR /&gt;Authentication text "cisco"&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual mac address is 0000.0c9f.f07d (Default MAC)&lt;BR /&gt;3 state changes, last state change 1y38w&lt;BR /&gt;IP redundancy name is hsrp-Vlan125-125 (default)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;VI-9K-TOP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vlan125 - Group 125 (HSRP-V1) (IPv4)&lt;BR /&gt;Local state is Active, priority 200 (Cfged 200), may preempt&lt;BR /&gt;Forwarding threshold(for vPC), lower: 0 upper: 200&lt;BR /&gt;Preemption Delay (Seconds) Minimum:300&lt;BR /&gt;Hellotime 3 sec, holdtime 10 sec&lt;BR /&gt;Next hello sent in 0.422000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual IP address is 10.20.125.1 (Cfged)&lt;BR /&gt;Active router is local&lt;BR /&gt;Standby router is 10.20.125.5 , priority 100 expires in 8.010000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Authentication text "cisco"&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual mac address is 0000.0c07.ac7d (Default MAC)&lt;BR /&gt;5 state changes, last state change 1d08h&lt;BR /&gt;IP redundancy name is hsrp-Vlan125-125 (default)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:39:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-22T22:39:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4033980#M13028</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Last week I had to power off all networking equipment to replace circuit breaker for the office. After work was complete all our network equipment powered on with no issues. Issue I have run into since then is getting IP address conflict notification from Meraki. My core switching for my two data centers are Nexus 9ks. I checked the MAC address for the conflict and its gateway for one of my VLANs. I am unsure what I need to do to get the ip address to not be on two different mac addresses. Let me know if you need more information to help me with this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 23:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4033980#M13028</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T23:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034020#M13031</link>
      <description>HI&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You're getting an IP conflict issue. Did you found which VLAN has a conflict? Is it the IP on Nexus switches? &lt;BR /&gt;Can you share your config please?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 01:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034020#M13031</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T01:47:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034103#M13033</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what device IP and mac add you see a conflict here. how is your configuration and connection to that device?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remove the device from the network in which you see the issue, clear the ip arp for that IP, see you still able to ping that IP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sometimes it may be VM in the network accidentally configured with templates, seen this many environments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034103#M13033</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T13:37:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034163#M13034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is VLAN 125. I am getting one mac address for one location and a different mac address on second data center, but both site are connected together which is causing the conflict&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 19:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034163#M13034</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T19:51:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034192#M13035</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Conflict for VLAN 125 ip 10.20.125.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="https://n123.meraki.com/LB-Edge/n/tuMSld7b/manage/usage/list#c=k3642f5" href="https://n123.meraki.com/LB-Edge/n/tuMSld7b/manage/usage/list#c=k3642f5" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;00:00:0C:9F:F0:7D&lt;/A&gt;- This is showing on LAB side&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="https://n123.meraki.com/HQ-Edge/n/48zF5b7b/manage/usage/list#c=k543899" href="https://n123.meraki.com/HQ-Edge/n/48zF5b7b/manage/usage/list#c=k543899" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;00:00:0C:07:AC:7D&lt;/A&gt;- Seen on HQ or VI side&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:18:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034192#M13035</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T21:18:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034204#M13036</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;as per the information, it looks like this is another side of the device MAC address, do you have a high-level network diagram of how these connections, and do you have any other source other than VPC connection these switches.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i see one of the trunks allowed this VLAN 125, where is that going to?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can you provide hsrp output from both the switches?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034204#M13036</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T22:09:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034217#M13037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;trunk vlan 125 is going to our storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;GT-9K-TOP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vlan125 - Group 125 (HSRP-V2) (IPv4)&lt;BR /&gt;Local state is Standby, priority 100 (Cfged 100), may preempt&lt;BR /&gt;Forwarding threshold(for vPC), lower: 0 upper: 100&lt;BR /&gt;Hellotime 3 sec, holdtime 10 sec&lt;BR /&gt;Next hello sent in 0.201000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual IP address is 10.20.125.1 (Cfged)&lt;BR /&gt;Active router is 10.20.125.4, priority 100 expires in 7.960000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Standby router is local&lt;BR /&gt;Authentication text "cisco"&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual mac address is 0000.0c9f.f07d (Default MAC)&lt;BR /&gt;3 state changes, last state change 1y38w&lt;BR /&gt;IP redundancy name is hsrp-Vlan125-125 (default)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;VI-9K-TOP&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vlan125 - Group 125 (HSRP-V1) (IPv4)&lt;BR /&gt;Local state is Active, priority 200 (Cfged 200), may preempt&lt;BR /&gt;Forwarding threshold(for vPC), lower: 0 upper: 200&lt;BR /&gt;Preemption Delay (Seconds) Minimum:300&lt;BR /&gt;Hellotime 3 sec, holdtime 10 sec&lt;BR /&gt;Next hello sent in 0.422000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual IP address is 10.20.125.1 (Cfged)&lt;BR /&gt;Active router is local&lt;BR /&gt;Standby router is 10.20.125.5 , priority 100 expires in 8.010000 sec(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Authentication text "cisco"&lt;BR /&gt;Virtual mac address is 0000.0c07.ac7d (Default MAC)&lt;BR /&gt;5 state changes, last state change 1d08h&lt;BR /&gt;IP redundancy name is hsrp-Vlan125-125 (default)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:39:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034217#M13037</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T22:39:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034221#M13038</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not see any issue around the design and config.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;only difference i see you post other config has below config- but your HSRP output shows 4 and 5 ? so are we missing something here ? how many device particiapating in the HSRP, how are they connected ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface Vlan125&lt;BR /&gt;description BUILD&lt;BR /&gt;no shutdown&lt;BR /&gt;no ip redirects&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ip address 10.20.125.3/24&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ip router eigrp 110&lt;BR /&gt;ip passive-interface eigrp 110&lt;BR /&gt;hsrp 125 &lt;BR /&gt;preempt delay minimum 300 &lt;BR /&gt;priority 200&lt;BR /&gt;ip 10.20.125.1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034221#M13038</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T22:53:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034226#M13039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is 4 devices total&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HQ(VI) 9k Top &amp;amp; 9k BTM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lab(GT) 9k Top &amp;amp; 9k BTM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 00:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034226#M13039</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-23T00:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034227#M13040</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;can you post all hsrp output to understand.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 00:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034227#M13040</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-23T00:18:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034229#M13041</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 00:20:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034229#M13041</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-23T00:20:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034269#M13042</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry i may said wrong, i am more intersted to all HSRP from all device related to VLAN125,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After reviewing some information again, you have 2 HSRP segement, and streched across DC, then you need to block VIP hsrp MAC address not to stretch across 2 DC. (this we can only confirm based on design)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034269#M13042</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-23T08:22:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034468#M13044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just noticed that vlan 125 on one side is using HSRP v1 and vlan 125 is using HSRP v2 at other side&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 04:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034468#M13044</guid>
      <dc:creator>awilliams2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-24T04:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP address conflict-Nexus 9k</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034504#M13045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for the clarification and make sense, different version in the network. hope all sorted by now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/ip-address-conflict-nexus-9k/m-p/4034504#M13045</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-24T08:09:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

