topic Re: Internet Consolidation - Architecture in Server Networking https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739157#M3003 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>It might increase your costs , but I'd create an VRF that connects to each of your hubs from both primary and DR sites from the private side of your firewalls. </P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:12:37 GMT akemp 2007-06-04T10:12:37Z Internet Consolidation - Architecture https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739154#M3000 <P>We have a Network on MPLS backbone with dual service provider.</P><P>There are 50 spoke location.</P><P>DC and DR location</P><P>Topology is hub and spoke with all sites accessing data hosted at primary DC.</P><P>ALso in case of disaster all the spoke sites will connect to DR site.</P><P>Servers at DR site are on unique IP and failover from DC to DR is taken care by BGP routing intelligence.</P><P>Aim is to give controlled internet access to all the spoke sites from DC and incase of failure internet should be available from DR site.</P><P>As per our design architecture we are planning to upgrade the last mile bandwidth and MPLS port of all spoke sites and central site MPLS port bandwidth to give integrated access on the same last mile for all the locations.</P><P>Both types of traffic private and public will ride on the same MPLS bancbone and come to the primary DC site CE router.</P><P>At CE router we will segreggate the traffic meant for datacentre and internet cloud.</P><P>We will also deploy firewall and separate internet router and proxy server for the proposed internet connectivity to control the spoke sites traffic.</P><P>Is this a good design.</P><P>Pls suggest with configuration on how are we going to achiecve this</P><P>Also currently we are using BGP between CE-PE --- it should take care of the global routing meant for Internet traffic by flooding default route across all the spoke sites</P><P>Pls find the existing architecute attahced.</P><P></P><P>Any inputs on the same will be appreciated.</P><P></P><P>Rgds</P><P></P><P> </P><P></P> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:12:15 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739154#M3000 deepakbihari 2007-06-04T06:12:15Z Re: Internet Consolidation - Architecture https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739155#M3001 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi deepak,</P><P></P><P>If ur n/w is spanned across regions viz delhi, chnai, blore etc then u shud prefer going for a consolidation per region. generally, internet consolidation burdens the link wih interne traffic inaddition to intranet. thus prefer for regional consolidation.</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:40:54 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739155#M3001 bvsnarayana03 2007-06-04T07:40:54Z Re: Internet Consolidation - Architecture https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739156#M3002 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>In all there are 36 locations nationally.</P><P>Pls suggest.</P><P></P><P></P><P>Rgds</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:11:37 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739156#M3002 deepakbihari 2007-06-04T09:11:37Z Re: Internet Consolidation - Architecture https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739157#M3003 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>It might increase your costs , but I'd create an VRF that connects to each of your hubs from both primary and DR sites from the private side of your firewalls. </P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:12:37 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/internet-consolidation-architecture/m-p/739157#M3003 akemp 2007-06-04T10:12:37Z