<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DLSw - MSFC - Redundancy in Server Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/dlsw-msfc-redundancy/m-p/53712#M331</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to look into Single Router Mode (SRM) at &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg_gd/redund.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg_gd/redund.htm&lt;/A&gt; for your MSFC redundancy.  You lose MSFC load balancing but simplify the configuration greatly since you don't need to use HSRP or DLSw Transparent Redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 15:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>9tsammut</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-27T15:13:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DLSw - MSFC - Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/dlsw-msfc-redundancy/m-p/53711#M330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do all the same rules apply when doing Dlsw redundancy with backup msfc's?  For example, do I need the following types of commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dlsw transparent redundancy-enable xxxx master-priority x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dlsw transparent map local-mac xxxx  remote-mac xxxx neighbor xxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dlsw transparent switch-support&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/dlsw-msfc-redundancy/m-p/53711#M330</guid>
      <dc:creator>wimoody</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-30T14:53:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DLSw - MSFC - Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/dlsw-msfc-redundancy/m-p/53712#M331</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to look into Single Router Mode (SRM) at &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg_gd/redund.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg_gd/redund.htm&lt;/A&gt; for your MSFC redundancy.  You lose MSFC load balancing but simplify the configuration greatly since you don't need to use HSRP or DLSw Transparent Redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 15:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/dlsw-msfc-redundancy/m-p/53712#M331</guid>
      <dc:creator>9tsammut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-27T15:13:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

