<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: redundancy from ibm os/390 tcpip to dual routers  in Server Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59073#M372</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at using VIPA .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ioss390/ios390cg/cgfault.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ioss390/ios390cg/cgfault.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r-godden</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-01-21T14:33:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>redundancy from ibm os/390 tcpip to dual routers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59072#M371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 2 routers that have single escon connections to the same mainframe tcpip stack (os/390 2.9).  What is the best way to provide failover from mainframe should one router fail. this involves mainly ibm tcpip configuration and would prefer to do without routing on mainframe and have to pass routing updates between mainframe and routers. Has anybody set up this scenario?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59072#M371</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-21T05:32:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: redundancy from ibm os/390 tcpip to dual routers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59073#M372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at using VIPA .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ioss390/ios390cg/cgfault.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ioss390/ios390cg/cgfault.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59073#M372</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-godden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-21T14:33:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: redundancy from ibm os/390 tcpip to dual routers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59074#M373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have looked at VIPA but was hoping there is something that does not require routing updates sent from mainframe and also the routed setup. We are running IBMs TCPIP not Cisco S/390.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:25:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/redundancy-from-ibm-os-390-tcpip-to-dual-routers/m-p/59074#M373</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-21T23:25:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

