<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Connect AS400 via CIP Attached Router/Frame Relay/Remote 1720 w serial in Server Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/connect-as400-via-cip-attached-router-frame-relay-remote-1720-w/m-p/132279#M767</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Have connected AS/400 from old T1 Channel at 56Kb and moved to serial cable on Cisco 1720 Router. Shows UP/UP and Strnm Sent. IBM says AS400 see poll and ack's but apparently ack never gets to VTAm on Host. Help???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is driving us nuts. IBM noted we are either polling too fast or ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help/suggestion would be appreciated. WE have other SDLC systems operating such as ATM Machines, and controllers, and some other AS/400's, but this one is not cooperating. What am I missing.  Any points will be greatly appreciated. Debugging info would be appreciated....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 02:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>2r.ross</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-01-07T02:07:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Connect AS400 via CIP Attached Router/Frame Relay/Remote 1720 w serial</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/connect-as400-via-cip-attached-router-frame-relay-remote-1720-w/m-p/132279#M767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have connected AS/400 from old T1 Channel at 56Kb and moved to serial cable on Cisco 1720 Router. Shows UP/UP and Strnm Sent. IBM says AS400 see poll and ack's but apparently ack never gets to VTAm on Host. Help???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is driving us nuts. IBM noted we are either polling too fast or ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help/suggestion would be appreciated. WE have other SDLC systems operating such as ATM Machines, and controllers, and some other AS/400's, but this one is not cooperating. What am I missing.  Any points will be greatly appreciated. Debugging info would be appreciated....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 02:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/connect-as400-via-cip-attached-router-frame-relay-remote-1720-w/m-p/132279#M767</guid>
      <dc:creator>2r.ross</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-07T02:07:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Connect AS400 via CIP Attached Router/Frame Relay/Remote 172</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/connect-as400-via-cip-attached-router-frame-relay-remote-1720-w/m-p/132280#M768</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the AS/400 on a point to point or multi-drop line? There is a known issue a while back on AS/400 and Cisco routers on multi-drop line. AS/400 has a different behavor on idle characters than FEP. Please find out if the AS/400 has PTF# MF10030 applied or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regardless if the patch is applied or not, please configure "idle-character mark" and "sdlc k1" on the sdlc interface. The commands should fix the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not, please run debug sdlc packet and AS/400 communication trace at the same time. If you have more than one SDLC interfaces or more than 1 SDLC addresses on the interface, please shut down all other interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:36:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/connect-as400-via-cip-attached-router-frame-relay-remote-1720-w/m-p/132280#M768</guid>
      <dc:creator>dixho</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-08T02:36:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

