<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Supplier remote access in Cloud Networking Platform</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459537#M13798</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;agree with everyone, set up a separate VLAN just for them and if not required, just hand out a static IP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 20:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pavement</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-22T20:39:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459533#M13794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As a production company we have may external suppliers who deliver machines or software to support our product processes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many of these suppliers will always try to bring their own router to be able to support the machine or software.&lt;BR /&gt;Often these machines or software also need to exchange data with internal machines or software. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I need your opnion here. How do you handle situations like this? What kind of policy you have here. And what is the best solution in these situations? Place them behind a separate mx for each supplier? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 18:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459533#M13794</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohanPlukon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T18:53:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459534#M13795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't allow third-party network equipment to be connected to your internal network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I often put them on their own VLAN, for a VLAN separate from the internal network, and provide them with VPN access to their devices.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459534#M13795</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T19:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459535#M13796</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Place them behind a single MX with each on their own VLAN would be my suggestion although how many suppliers at any one time would you have onsite? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459535#M13796</guid>
      <dc:creator>BlakeRichardson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T19:44:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459536#M13797</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;First time I hear about a supplier installing equipment inside the infrastructure.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A network for consultants is usually used and policies are created on what should and should not be accessed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 20:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459536#M13797</guid>
      <dc:creator>aleabrahao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T20:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459537#M13798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;agree with everyone, set up a separate VLAN just for them and if not required, just hand out a static IP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 20:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459537#M13798</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavement</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T20:39:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459538#M13799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Then you have the same thought as me. But it is something that has been accepted for years, but in my opnion cant be any more. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459538#M13799</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohanPlukon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-23T07:05:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459539#M13800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you all for your answers. This helps me. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459539#M13800</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohanPlukon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-23T07:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459540#M13801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It can vary, from one to ten or fifteen per location. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depends on the level of automation within a location. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459540#M13801</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohanPlukon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-23T07:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Supplier remote access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459541#M13802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree.  The threat landscape has evolved, and security systems and practices must evolve as a result.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 23:00:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/supplier-remote-access/m-p/5459541#M13802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-23T23:00:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

