<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: QSFP &amp; SFP28 in Cloud Networking Platform</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5546680#M14563</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the issue here is less about the brands and more about the signaling mismatch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You’ve got QSFP+ (40G) on the MS355 side and SFP28 (25G) on the Ubiquiti USW-Pro-Aggregate side, and those don’t really line up cleanly. The 40G IR4 module is basically running 4×10G lanes, while SFP28 is a single 25G lane — so there’s no straightforward way for them to “talk” to each other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also yeah, LC/LC doesn’t really help here — that’s just the connector, not the signaling. Easy trap to fall into.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want something that actually works, you’ve got a couple of more realistic options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Drop both sides down to 10G (SFP+), that’s usually the easiest&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Or use a QSFP+ breakout (4×10G), if the MS355 supports it&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;40G → 25G direct is… pretty much a dead end in most setups&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the optics side, mixing vendors can sometimes add another layer of pain (EEPROM checks, etc.), even if in theory it &lt;EM&gt;should&lt;/EM&gt; work. If you’re testing different modules, it can help to use ones that are coded for multiple platforms or can be customized — something like this as a reference:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.fibermanialink.com/collections/fiber-networking-equipment/high-speed-transceivers/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.fibermanialink.com/collections/fiber-networking-equipment/high-speed-transceivers/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yanjoe9527</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-20T03:35:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>QSFP &amp; SFP28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458312#M13423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a set of stacked MS355-48x2's and am trying to connect a set of non-cisco TOR aggregate switches that have SFP28 ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL class="lia-list-style-type-upper-alpha"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Has anyone tried this? and&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Were there any specific transceivers that worked if you DID get it to work.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I'm trying to mix is the aforementioned MS355's with an FS QSFP-IR4 40G transceiver down to a Ubiquiti USW-Pro-Aggregate switch with SFP28 ports.  The transceiver used is a native Ubiquiti SFP28 unit.  Both with LC/LC connectors.  Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 20:59:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458312#M13423</guid>
      <dc:creator>KirkM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T20:59:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QSFP &amp; SFP28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458313#M13424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.meraki.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/50027"&gt;@KirkM&lt;/A&gt; SFP+ and SFP28 are compatible and will run at 10Gb/s. QSFP+ and QSFP28 are also compatible and will run at 40Gb/s. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot generally connect a QSFP to SFP as the former is really just four channels of the latter, though there some adapters that disable three channels to make a 40Gb port run at 10Gb.  I don't know whether these work with Meraki switches and I would be surprised if they then work reliably with a SFP28 port, but it could...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The FS module that is most likely to work is: &lt;A href="https://www.fs.com/uk/products/72582.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.fs.com/uk/products/72582.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458313#M13424</guid>
      <dc:creator>CMR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T21:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QSFP &amp; SFP28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458314#M13425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. SFP28 is an enhanced version of SFP+. It has the same size as SFP+, but it can support single channel 25Gb/s rate. SFP28 provides an efficient solution for 10G-25G-100G network upgrades to meet the growing needs of next-generation data center networks.&lt;BR /&gt;2, QSFP+ package can support four channels at the same time, each channel data rate of 10Gbit/s, through the four channels to achieve 40Gbps transmission rate. Compared with SFP+, the transmission rate of the QSFP+ optical module can be up to four times that of the SFP+ optical module. The QSFP+ optical module can be directly used when a 40 GBIT/s network is deployed, effectively saving costs and improving port density.&lt;BR /&gt;3. SFP28 is the encapsulation type of the 25 GBIT/s /32 GBIT/s optical module. QSFP+ is an encapsulation type of the 40 GBIT/s or 56 gbit/s optical module. SFP28 has a single laser and a single detector; The QSFP+ built-in 4-channel laser array and 4-channel detector array encapsulation type of the interface protocol are different&lt;BR /&gt;4. Conclusion: The two can not be connected successfully&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H1 id="toc-hId-1816401020"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FS QSFP-IR4-40G&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://cn.fs.com/products/84672.html?attribute=9354&amp;amp;id=314121" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://cn.fs.com/products/84672.html?attribute=9354&amp;amp;id=314121&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458314#M13425</guid>
      <dc:creator>zhangqd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-28T16:28:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QSFP &amp; SFP28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458315#M13426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As an update the FS module shown above is unlikely to work as it relies on the switch supporting the 1x40Gb -&amp;gt; 4x10Gb splitting mode breakout cables.  This is not supported on MS355s or any other Meraki switch apart from perhaps the MS390 as that is a Cisco 9300 and it would work on one of those.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 09:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5458315#M13426</guid>
      <dc:creator>CMR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-04T09:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QSFP &amp; SFP28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5546680#M14563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the issue here is less about the brands and more about the signaling mismatch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You’ve got QSFP+ (40G) on the MS355 side and SFP28 (25G) on the Ubiquiti USW-Pro-Aggregate side, and those don’t really line up cleanly. The 40G IR4 module is basically running 4×10G lanes, while SFP28 is a single 25G lane — so there’s no straightforward way for them to “talk” to each other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also yeah, LC/LC doesn’t really help here — that’s just the connector, not the signaling. Easy trap to fall into.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want something that actually works, you’ve got a couple of more realistic options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Drop both sides down to 10G (SFP+), that’s usually the easiest&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Or use a QSFP+ breakout (4×10G), if the MS355 supports it&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;40G → 25G direct is… pretty much a dead end in most setups&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the optics side, mixing vendors can sometimes add another layer of pain (EEPROM checks, etc.), even if in theory it &lt;EM&gt;should&lt;/EM&gt; work. If you’re testing different modules, it can help to use ones that are coded for multiple platforms or can be customized — something like this as a reference:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.fibermanialink.com/collections/fiber-networking-equipment/high-speed-transceivers/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.fibermanialink.com/collections/fiber-networking-equipment/high-speed-transceivers/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5546680#M14563</guid>
      <dc:creator>yanjoe9527</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T03:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QSFP &amp; SFP28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5546692#M14564</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1988957"&gt;@yanjoe9527&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;neither of your suggestions work on native Meraki hardware including the MS355 as breakout cables or single lane cables are not supported.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 06:00:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-networking-platform/qsfp-sfp28/m-p/5546692#M14564</guid>
      <dc:creator>CMR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T06:00:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

