topic Re: Group APs by name in Controllers https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452671#M1201 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Unfortunately we don't report operational status of the AP itself.&nbsp; The approach you have is the best I can think of.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:00:23 GMT Spencer Zier 2016-01-05T21:00:23Z Group APs by name https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452669#M1199 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hello, community.</P><P></P><P>I need to pull the AP's operational status (registered, not registered), and on a PI Portal i see lets say 1000 unified APs, 900 registered and 100 not registered.</P><P></P><P>To pull this kind of information via API i make a request like so:</P><P><SPAN style="font-family: 'courier new', courier;"><STRONG><SPAN>curl -k "</SPAN><A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://user:pass@ip/webacs/api/v1/data/Radios/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://user:pass@ip/webacs/api/v1/data/Radios/</A></STRONG></SPAN></P><P></P><P>but the total count is nearly 2000. I assume this is because of some of the APs have two radio interfaces (right?). So is there any way to group the result by say apName to get the same count as on a page? Or is there a way to get distinct apName (no repeats).</P><P></P><P>Thanks!</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:58:10 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452669#M1199 ivanov.arseniy 2015-12-23T17:58:10Z Re: Group APs by name https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452670#M1200 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>May be there is another way to pull the info about registered/not registered APs? I'd be glad to know!</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 24 Dec 2015 15:49:46 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452670#M1200 ivanov.arseniy 2015-12-24T15:49:46Z Re: Group APs by name https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452671#M1201 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Unfortunately we don't report operational status of the AP itself.&nbsp; The approach you have is the best I can think of.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:00:23 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/group-aps-by-name/m-p/3452671#M1201 Spencer Zier 2016-01-05T21:00:23Z