<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DUO AUTH API HMAC signature in APIs</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5333741#M813</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:45:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>er-praveen1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-26T12:45:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DUO AUTH API HMAC signature</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5332920#M811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per the DUO AUTH API documentation,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Lastly, compute the HMAC-SHA1 of this canonical representation, using your Duo application's&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;secret key&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;as the HMAC key. Send this signature as hexadecimal ASCII (i.e. not raw binary data). Use HTTP Basic authentication for the request, using your&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;integration key&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;as the username and the HMAC-SHA1 signature as the password.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does this mean any caller is bound by these algorithms? Can I use a stronger algorithm say HMAC-SHA256 or 512?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 05:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5332920#M811</guid>
      <dc:creator>er-praveen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-24T05:35:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DUO AUTH API HMAC signature</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5333525#M812</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey, we have a newer signing method using SHA-512 that is not in that document, but is supported by all our &lt;A href="https://github.com/duosecurity" target="_self"&gt;API clients on GitHub&lt;/A&gt;. You can see those signing details here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://github.com/duosecurity/duo_hmac_python/blob/main/duo_hmac/duo_hmac.py" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/duosecurity/duo_hmac_python/blob/main/duo_hmac/duo_hmac.py&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 16:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5333525#M812</guid>
      <dc:creator>DuoKristina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-25T16:22:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DUO AUTH API HMAC signature</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5333741#M813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:45:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/apis/duo-auth-api-hmac-signature/m-p/5333741#M813</guid>
      <dc:creator>er-praveen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-26T12:45:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

