<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Adding Organization to Webex Calling Webhooks in Webex for Developers</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-for-developers/adding-organization-to-webex-calling-webhooks/m-p/4703479#M1617</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create a webhook that will be notified anytime a call is received by or placed by &lt;EM&gt;anyone&lt;/EM&gt; in my Webex Organization. Currently,&amp;nbsp; you can only create webhook for the telephony_calls resource from the user who created the webhook's perspective. E.g. if User A creates the webhook, the webhook receiver will only be notified when User A places a call versus &lt;EM&gt;anyone&lt;/EM&gt; in the organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found other posts from several months ago stating this resource group doesn't allow the ability to utilize the ownedBy property when creating the webhook to specify the organization as a whole. Is that something we can request to be changed? And if not, how do you recommend we go about getting calls for every member of the organization programmatically?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>keyle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-14T16:34:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adding Organization to Webex Calling Webhooks</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-for-developers/adding-organization-to-webex-calling-webhooks/m-p/4703479#M1617</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create a webhook that will be notified anytime a call is received by or placed by &lt;EM&gt;anyone&lt;/EM&gt; in my Webex Organization. Currently,&amp;nbsp; you can only create webhook for the telephony_calls resource from the user who created the webhook's perspective. E.g. if User A creates the webhook, the webhook receiver will only be notified when User A places a call versus &lt;EM&gt;anyone&lt;/EM&gt; in the organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found other posts from several months ago stating this resource group doesn't allow the ability to utilize the ownedBy property when creating the webhook to specify the organization as a whole. Is that something we can request to be changed? And if not, how do you recommend we go about getting calls for every member of the organization programmatically?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-for-developers/adding-organization-to-webex-calling-webhooks/m-p/4703479#M1617</guid>
      <dc:creator>keyle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-14T16:34:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adding Organization to Webex Calling Webhooks</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-for-developers/adding-organization-to-webex-calling-webhooks/m-p/4703639#M1618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1405796"&gt;@keyle&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you are correct this feature is not yet available. You can however vote for it as there is already an existing idea suggestion for it here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-8154" target="_blank"&gt;https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-8154&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;. The more votes an idea receives the more likely Product Management will prioritise it for future implementation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 06:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-for-developers/adding-organization-to-webex-calling-webhooks/m-p/4703639#M1618</guid>
      <dc:creator>Janos Benyovszki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-15T06:52:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

