<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Dejan, I guess we'll in Collaboration Applications</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738425#M2355</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dejan, I guess we'll work this out with NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris Deren</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-20T14:24:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CWMS 2.5 thin provisioning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738423#M2353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"&gt;About to install CWMS 2.5 on B-series at a customer that has NetApp NFS datastore which only allows thin provisioning. I found the following statement in CWMS install guide, can someone confirm if it would be supported to install CWMS as thin provisioned instead of thick:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;" /&gt;&lt;BR style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;" /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"&gt;"You must select Thick Provisioning and create the maximum virtual disk space required for your system. With Thin Provisioning, VMware allocates the file system space on an as-needed basis that can result in poor performance. Lazy zero is sufficient and eager zero is acceptable, but eager zero will take more time to complete."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:27:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738423#M2353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris Deren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-18T00:27:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Chris, You must have THICK</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738424#M2354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You must have THICK provisioning. We've seen many performance issues with THIN provisioning and this wouldn't be supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Dejan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:21:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738424#M2354</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpetrovi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T13:21:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Dejan, I guess we'll</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738425#M2355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dejan, I guess we'll work this out with NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/cwms-2-5-thin-provisioning/m-p/2738425#M2355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris Deren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T14:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

