<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access in Collaboration Applications</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493305#M33302</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;Hello community,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are having a very similar or identical problem: we are installing the Cisco Jabber solution without inconvenience in our infrastructure (LAN, WiFi, remote access via VPN, through the Firewall), but we can not run Jabber with DirectAccess.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Jabber client automatically discovers the services in all cases (SRV records), the user is able to authenticate and use the messaging services. Even through DirectAccess, it manages to control its desktop phone (which is not really necessary if we consider that the user accesses the corporate network from his home with DirectAccess).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But the problem occurs when we want to take control of the softphone using DirectAccess. The connection is never established. By performing a packet capture in the Firewall, we do not observe SIP connection attempts, however in the Jabber log, there are records that indicate connection attempts using the IPv4 of the CUCM server instead of the FQDN (DirectAccess requires FQDN since it uses a tunnel IPv6).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All our configuration of CUCM, IM &amp;amp; P, etc., is made with FQDN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could anyone solve this problem?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Federico Cavallaro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-28T23:21:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493300#M33297</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We recently setup MRA and can successfully connect Jabber for Mac, Jabber for iPhones, and Jabber for windows (non corporate windows 7 machines).&amp;nbsp; When we try connecting from our corporate image (Windows 7 with Direct Access (Always On)) the client gets the message "Cannot communicate with server".&amp;nbsp; Our Microsoft Direct Access perfoms DNS lookups to our internal DNS servers but we have excluded the following lookups from Direct Access:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;_cuplogin._tcp.example.com&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;_cisco-uds._tcp.example.com&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately we are still unable to get machines to connect over MRA.&amp;nbsp; They work just fine inside our network.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts would be appreaciated. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are running the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CUCM 9.1.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CUPS 9.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;J4W 10.5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493300#M33297</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS KALETH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-17T23:42:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493301#M33298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;This community does not provide technical &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;support&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt; and is not staffed with technical &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;support&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt; experts. I recommend you post this and future technical&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt; support q&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;uestions to the Cisco&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt; Support C&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;ommunity (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/index.jspa" style="color: #0000cc; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/index.jspa&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;) where our Cisco technica&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;l support ex&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;perts provide assistance. Another option is to open a ticket with the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/go/support" style="color: #0000cc; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;" target="_blank"&gt;www.cisco.com/go/&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222;"&gt;support&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;to get expert debugging assistance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;Kelli Glass&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8000001907349px;"&gt;Moderator for Cisco Customer Communities&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493301#M33298</guid>
      <dc:creator>keglass</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-03T16:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493302#M33299</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ckaleth,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you ever get a resolution to this?&amp;nbsp; We have the exact same problem (but running CUCM/IM&amp;amp;P 10.5 and Jabber 10.6).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what i understand, and I was not involved on the Direct Access side, is that it worked but suddenly stopped.&amp;nbsp; Looking at the PRT,&amp;nbsp; I have a hunch that it could have stopped working when i deployed SSO for Jabber.&amp;nbsp; I have not added SSO for the MRA peice yet and I am not sure that i will as the use case seems pretty limited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493302#M33299</guid>
      <dc:creator>ybpants</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-30T20:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493303#M33300</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;DNS was originally the issue but then we faced an internal routing issue where some clients would come through MRA but couldn't route to the CUPS server they were associated too. Our CUPs are across WANs.&amp;nbsp; We haven't done SSO so I can't speak on that but would be interested to know how well that works and it is worth it in a windows environment that can use kerberos. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 01:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493303#M33300</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS KALETH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T01:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493304#M33301</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the exact same issue.&amp;nbsp; I have the same exemptions, however I still get "Cannot communicate with the server"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you provide specifics on how you were able to resolve this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493304#M33301</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkoncurat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-08T12:26:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493305#M33302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;Hello community,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are having a very similar or identical problem: we are installing the Cisco Jabber solution without inconvenience in our infrastructure (LAN, WiFi, remote access via VPN, through the Firewall), but we can not run Jabber with DirectAccess.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Jabber client automatically discovers the services in all cases (SRV records), the user is able to authenticate and use the messaging services. Even through DirectAccess, it manages to control its desktop phone (which is not really necessary if we consider that the user accesses the corporate network from his home with DirectAccess).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But the problem occurs when we want to take control of the softphone using DirectAccess. The connection is never established. By performing a packet capture in the Firewall, we do not observe SIP connection attempts, however in the Jabber log, there are records that indicate connection attempts using the IPv4 of the CUCM server instead of the FQDN (DirectAccess requires FQDN since it uses a tunnel IPv6).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All our configuration of CUCM, IM &amp;amp; P, etc., is made with FQDN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could anyone solve this problem?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493305#M33302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Cavallaro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T23:21:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493306#M33303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This issue is also documented here&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11919316/jabber-windows-microsoft-direct-access&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other than blocking the UDS record no solution yet I have seen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Srini&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493306#M33303</guid>
      <dc:creator>skilambi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T23:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493307#M33304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Srini!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493307#M33304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Cavallaro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-29T01:07:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493308#M33305</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its not supported and too my knowledge never will be.&amp;nbsp; You need Expressway C&amp;amp;E (i.e MRA) or Anyconnect. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:03:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493308#M33305</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS KALETH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-29T02:03:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493309#M33306</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks ckaleth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At this point we have opened a TAC case (after several days of testing), but everything tells us that there is some incompatibility between Jabber and DirectAccess. Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493309#M33306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Cavallaro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-29T02:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jabber4W using MRA with Microsoft Direct Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493310#M33307</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even S4B doesnt support Direct Access according to some articles like this one &lt;A href="https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28955202/Skype-for-Business-2015-Screen-Sharing-won%27t-work-over-DirectAccess-connection.html" title="https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28955202/Skype-for-Business-2015-Screen-Sharing-won%27t-work-over-DirectAccess-connection.html"&gt;https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28955202/Skype-for-Business-2015-Screen-Sharing-won%27t-work-over-DirectAcces…&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Back to Jabber, Direct Access is not supported, I know of one customer who played with the routing tables in Direct &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Access to try to get Jabber traffic to go outside of the Direct Access tunnel and use Expressway to bring the traffic in.&amp;nbsp; So tried to create an exception rule.&amp;nbsp; I can not confirm if that worked or not for all workloads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ashish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/jabber4w-using-mra-with-microsoft-direct-access/m-p/3493310#M33307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ashish Patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-29T08:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

