<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: codec pass-through in Collaboration Applications</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187124#M44487</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Nithin, that's exactly what I was looking for!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a follow-on question, do you know if there are any negative effects of adding &lt;STRONG&gt;codec pass-through&lt;/STRONG&gt; under the &lt;U&gt;transcoder&lt;/U&gt;? What I mean is, will the transcoder still be able to do g711-g729 conversion, but adding pass-though will allow additional beneifts like dtmf interop?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>j.a.m.e.s</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-22T17:58:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>codec pass-through</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187076#M44485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone explain what &lt;STRONG&gt;codec pass-through&lt;/STRONG&gt; does under dspfarm please? It is available under the transcoder and mtp resources:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;dspfarm profile 4 transcode universal&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; description XCODE
 codec g711alaw
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g729r8
 codec g722-64
&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt; codec pass-through&lt;/FONT&gt;
 maximum sessions 4
&lt;STRONG&gt;dspfarm profile 1 mtp&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; description SWMTP G729
 codec g729r8
&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt; codec pass-through&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; maximum sessions software 50
 associate application SCCP
&lt;STRONG&gt;dspfarm profile 2 mtp&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; description SWMTP ALAW
 codec g711alaw
&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt; codec pass-through&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; maximum sessions software 50
 associate application SCCP
dspfarm profile 3 mtp
 description SWMTP ULAW
 codec g711ulaw
&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt; codec pass-through&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; maximum sessions software 50
 associate application SCCP&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ask this in the context of my ITSP only supporting rfc2833 and thanks to Jonathan's excellent post, I know that CTIQBE/UCCX only supports KPML/OOB:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/dtmf-not-working-with-uccx/td-p/2317592" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/dtmf-not-working-with-uccx/td-p/2317592&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see some strange messages in the CallManager traces relating to CUBE -&amp;gt; UCCX calls:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;MrmAllocateMtpResourceReq: If pt cap is requested , try to allocate rtcp pt capable mtp&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;My assumption is that&lt;STRONG&gt; codec pass-through&lt;/STRONG&gt; means the DSPs will handle RTCP, but how this is relevant to UCCX and rfc2833 I don't know?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187076#M44485</guid>
      <dc:creator>j.a.m.e.s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-22T17:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: codec pass-through</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187098#M44486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a look on below thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/question-on-codec-pass-through/td-p/2775363" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/question-on-codec-pass-through/td-p/2775363&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187098#M44486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nithin Eluvathingal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-22T14:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: codec pass-through</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187124#M44487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Nithin, that's exactly what I was looking for!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a follow-on question, do you know if there are any negative effects of adding &lt;STRONG&gt;codec pass-through&lt;/STRONG&gt; under the &lt;U&gt;transcoder&lt;/U&gt;? What I mean is, will the transcoder still be able to do g711-g729 conversion, but adding pass-though will allow additional beneifts like dtmf interop?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/codec-pass-through/m-p/4187124#M44487</guid>
      <dc:creator>j.a.m.e.s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-22T17:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

