<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Recommended Replacement for TMS in Collaboration Applications</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5368917#M51384</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen multiple designs here by the Cisco CX Team that have recommended Synergy Sky for some of the things that TMS does currently - but obviously the fully Cisco supported and recommended option is to migrate to Webex and use Control Hub.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I guess some of it will depend on what functionality from TMS that you are trying to replicate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:36:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wayne DeNardi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-10T05:36:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended Replacement for TMS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354900#M51319</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking to find out what is the recommended or preferred replacement for TMS. VQ Conference Manager or Synergy Sky Connect?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 16:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354900#M51319</guid>
      <dc:creator>terrence-williams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-12T16:22:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Replacement for TMS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354906#M51320</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Another option is Mividas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 17:24:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354906#M51320</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger Kallberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-12T17:24:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Replacement for TMS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354909#M51321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. Do you know which one is most preferred by Cisco?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 17:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354909#M51321</guid>
      <dc:creator>terrence-williams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-12T17:34:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Replacement for TMS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354932#M51322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Afraid not. I have no first hand experience with any of these.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 18:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5354932#M51322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger Kallberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-12T18:34:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Replacement for TMS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5355494#M51323</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Terence,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ex-Cisco and now working for VQ. We have done tone of TMS migrations already working alongside Cisco. If you have few minutes would love to chat on your scenario and show you our solution. We can also put you in touch with some of the Cisco teams we work with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Isidro&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ifernandez@vqcomms.com&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5355494#M51323</guid>
      <dc:creator>isidrov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-16T09:32:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Replacement for TMS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5368917#M51384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen multiple designs here by the Cisco CX Team that have recommended Synergy Sky for some of the things that TMS does currently - but obviously the fully Cisco supported and recommended option is to migrate to Webex and use Control Hub.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I guess some of it will depend on what functionality from TMS that you are trying to replicate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:36:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-applications/recommended-replacement-for-tms/m-p/5368917#M51384</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wayne DeNardi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-10T05:36:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

