<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ? in Cisco Catalyst Center</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083797#M2154</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, Damien beat me to it. Cheers &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 05:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jedolphi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-12T05:17:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083779#M2149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi experts ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I m planning for DNAC deployment and&amp;nbsp; I know that the&amp;nbsp; WAN latency between DNAC to&amp;nbsp; reach managed devices is 250ms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im not sure it is tolerable to proceed or it is impossible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 04:17:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083779#M2149</guid>
      <dc:creator>trandinh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T04:17:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083794#M2151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Imran's guide here covers latency best practices. The recommendation was 100ms RTT, where up to 200ms could be possible but not ideal.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-documents/cisco-sda-design-guidance-and-best-practices/ta-p/3865954" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-documents/cisco-sda-design-guidance-and-best-practices/ta-p/3865954&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The same guidance is provided here&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-documents/cisco-sd-access-for-distributed-campus-with-ip-as-a-transit/ta-p/3837284" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-documents/cisco-sd-access-for-distributed-campus-with-ip-as-a-transit/ta-p/3837284&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 05:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083794#M2151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T05:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083795#M2152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;250ms is outside the limits of what we publicly endorse as of right now, May 2020, but it&amp;nbsp; might change later. Please see the PDF here for official limits -&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-documents/cisco-sda-design-guidance-and-best-practices/ta-p/3865954" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-documents/cisco-sda-design-guidance-and-best-practices/ta-p/3865954&lt;/A&gt; . In some circumstances we allow to exceed the limits in that PDF but it requires a discussion with your technical presales team please. Best regards, Jerome&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 05:16:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083795#M2152</guid>
      <dc:creator>jedolphi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T05:16:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083797#M2154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, Damien beat me to it. Cheers &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 05:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4083797#M2154</guid>
      <dc:creator>jedolphi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T05:17:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4101022#M2271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;See the Latency Considerations section of the SDA Design Guide url provided below.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 117.233px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.1129);"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="highlight begin selected"&gt;Lat&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 106.04px; top: 117.233px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.11919);"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="highlight end selected"&gt;ency&lt;/SPAN&gt; considerations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 149.633px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03634);"&gt;Fabric access points operate in local mode. This requires a RTT (round&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 629.033px; top: 149.633px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif;"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 638.233px; top: 149.633px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.05588);"&gt;trip time) of 20ms or less between the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 172.833px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03485);"&gt;AP and the Wireless LAN Controllers. This generally means that the WLC is deployed in the same physical site &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 196.083px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03366);"&gt;as the Access P&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 200.083px; top: 196.083px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04631);"&gt;oints. If dedicated dark fiber exists between the physical sites and the WLCs in the data center &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 219.683px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04009);"&gt;and the latency requirement is meant, WLCs and APs may be in different physical locations. This is commonly &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 242.883px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03553);"&gt;seen in metro area networks and SD&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 357.767px; top: 242.883px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif;"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 366.967px; top: 242.883px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.0443);"&gt;Access for Dis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 479.4px; top: 242.883px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04428);"&gt;tributed Campus. APs should not be deployed across the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 266.483px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04015);"&gt;WAN from the WLCs. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 301.283px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03598);"&gt;Cisco DNA Center 3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 232.083px; top: 301.283px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif;"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 241.283px; top: 301.283px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03851);"&gt;Node Clusters must have a RTT of 10ms or less between nodes in the cluster. For &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 324.483px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04389);"&gt;physical topology options and failover scenarios, please see &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 546.633px; top: 324.483px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.0361);"&gt;Cisco DNA Center 3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 703.083px; top: 324.483px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif;"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 712.283px; top: 324.483px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03688);"&gt;Node Cluster High Availability &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 348.517px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04739);"&gt;scenarios and network connectivity details&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 409.367px; top: 348.517px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.05702);"&gt;technote. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 382.917px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04156);"&gt;Latency in the network is an important consideration for performance and the RTT between Cisco DNA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 876.767px; top: 382.917px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04061);"&gt;Center &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 406.117px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03969);"&gt;and any network device it manages should be taken into account. The optimal RTT should be less than 100 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 429.717px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04479);"&gt;milliseconds to achieve optimal performance for Base Automation, Assurance, Software&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 756.717px; top: 429.717px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif;"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 765.917px; top: 429.717px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04122);"&gt;Defined Access, and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 452.917px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04458);"&gt;all other solutions provide by Cisco D&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 364.567px; top: 452.917px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.04406);"&gt;NA Center. The maximum supported latency is 200ms. Latency between &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 476.167px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.05007);"&gt;100ms and 200ms is supported, although longer execution times could be experienced for certain events &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="left: 75.24px; top: 500.167px; font-size: 16.8px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(1.03848);"&gt;including Inventory Collection, Fabric Provisioning, SWIM, and other process&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Campus/sda-sdg-2019oct.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Campus/sda-sdg-2019oct.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2020-06-10 at 3.28.29 PM.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/76456i186EFED9225F6C10/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2020-06-10 at 3.28.29 PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2020-06-10 at 3.28.29 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 21:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4101022#M2271</guid>
      <dc:creator>tpoulose</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T21:09:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNAC latency to Managed Devices  ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4536278#M4744</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a query that coincides with this discussion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since 2020, I notice that the permitted latency between DNAC and FE has increased as indicated by Jerome i.e. it's gone up to 200ms from 100ms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has allowed me to go forward with proposing a multi-site SDA solution for a customer to replace their legacy traditional networking environment. However, whilst about 95% of the edge devices are within the 200ms limit, a handful of small sites are outside the limit. I intend to discuss with Cisco presales as advised but from the perspective of being aware and fully informed of potential technical risk and then accepting and signing off on those risks, what are the actual potential issues that affect FEs further away than 200ms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect SWIM updates might be an issue&amp;nbsp; but affected FEs could be treated as exceptions and updated manually as a workaround. Also, will the potential issues be restricted to only those devices outside the 200ms&amp;nbsp; limit or could they affect the entire fabric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2022 09:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/dnac-latency-to-managed-devices/m-p/4536278#M4744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Redman1804</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-22T09:47:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

