<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco DNA opt-out? in Cisco Catalyst Center</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4281123#M2996</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the whole DNA thing is BS and a way for Cisco to make more MRR. I saw some opt-out sku's for the 3800 series. Looks like they don't work in ccw though. Is there any way to opt out? (specifically for the Cat 9k line) I work at an MSP where a lot of the smaller clients only need layer 3 routing as far as licensing goes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>austiabrm57</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-28T05:28:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco DNA opt-out?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4281123#M2996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the whole DNA thing is BS and a way for Cisco to make more MRR. I saw some opt-out sku's for the 3800 series. Looks like they don't work in ccw though. Is there any way to opt out? (specifically for the Cat 9k line) I work at an MSP where a lot of the smaller clients only need layer 3 routing as far as licensing goes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4281123#M2996</guid>
      <dc:creator>austiabrm57</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-28T05:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco DNA opt-out?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4281400#M3000</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you please reach out to your sales team, account manager, Cisco Partner, and/or Cisco Distributor (however you purchase) to see what options are available.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4281400#M3000</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Cuthbert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-28T14:36:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco DNA opt-out?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4294727#M3140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Cisco DNA tax on 9K switches with no-opt out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the 9300 launched and the compulsory DNA licensing freaked everyone out Cisco where able to calm the waters by pointing out that a 9300 with DNA subscription was price equivalent to a 3850 and that the cost of the hardware line item had been significantly reduced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, 2 years later when talking to customers who have never heard of 3850s I can no longer keep comparing the cost of a new switch with that of an old switch, and when customers ask what the DNA subscription is for and I have to tell them it is for a service they will never use as a DNAC appliance is too expensive. It is just not a situation that I can justify or defend to my customers so I now just refer to it as the DNA tax and leave it to the customer to decide if they still wish to purchase Cisco switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of this in a completive environment where Juniper and HP/Aruba are offering switches with a subscription that actually has customer perceived value in the form of Juniper Mist or Aruba Central.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:47:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4294727#M3140</guid>
      <dc:creator>cmcclinton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-20T16:47:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco DNA opt-out?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4295556#M3142</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm certainly not an expert in Cisco licensing, I'm not in sales, and I am definitely using DNA.. but my understanding is that the subscription also comes with the permanent licensing that allows LAN Base, IP Base, IP Enterprise, AP WLC licenses, etc.&amp;nbsp; From a justification standpoint, even if you're not using DNA Center, couldn't this be explained as the new equivalent to the old licensing that you had to purchase anyways?&amp;nbsp; At the end of the mandatory 3 year DNA subscription, if you don't need DNA I'd think you just wouldn't renew it but I think you still retain the network feature licensing that it included.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4295556#M3142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Salmans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-22T19:50:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco DNA opt-out?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4824402#M6802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Permanent feature licenses are Network Essential / Network Advantage. It's part of the product SKU (SKU is different for switch with Ess and Adv license). It has nothing to do with DNA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A compulsory DNA license with discounted HW was a promo to provide customers with a DNA 3-year subscription trial free-of-charge, but without saying, it's a free-of-charge trial. It's weird and short-sighted.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 20:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4824402#M6802</guid>
      <dc:creator>gustm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-28T20:44:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco DNA opt-out?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4856916#M7078</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/29271"&gt;@Jason Salmans&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;even if you're not using DNA Center, couldn't this be explained as the new equivalent to the old licensing that you had to purchase anyways?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think the "DNA tax" was a marketing scheme.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It was aimed squarely at the clients who bothered to look at the bill of materials (BoM) and gets intrigued at the DNAC line item.&amp;nbsp; Once the customer calls to find out what DNAC is, then the classic hook-like-and-sinker steps in.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Back then, it was reasoned that every "DNA tax" purchased goes to DNAC development.&amp;nbsp; &lt;FONT color="#FFFFFF"&gt;Uh-huh.&amp;nbsp; Sure.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2023 06:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-catalyst-center/cisco-dna-opt-out/m-p/4856916#M7078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-18T06:56:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

