<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081584#M141853</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you able to login to the secondary node after you de-register and convert it to a standalone? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-12T18:53:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081582#M141850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am seeing a weird problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I deregistered secondary admin/monitor node from primary admin/monitor node. I see successfully deregistered message.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the deregistered node is still showing SEC(A) and SEC(M). It is not changing to standalone mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is disrupting the upgrade of distributed deployment of ISE nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any clues?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:53:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081582#M141850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kashish_Patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T02:53:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081583#M141851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are running &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.1.0.665 with patch 3 installed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081583#M141851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kashish_Patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-12T07:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081584#M141853</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you able to login to the secondary node after you de-register and convert it to a standalone? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081584#M141853</guid>
      <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-12T18:53:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081585#M141855</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems as if there is some communication issues between the two nodes. I have seen this before and the best bet is to reset the config and restore the db from the administration node. I dont think forcing it to primary will do anything but its worth a shot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:48:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081585#M141855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T04:48:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081586#M141856</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tarik,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We found that it was because of bug:&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/cisco/psn/bssprt/bss?searchType=bstbugidsearch&amp;amp;page=bstBugDetail&amp;amp;BugID=CSCtz80240" target="_blank"&gt;CSCtz80240&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081586#M141856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kashish_Patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T04:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081587#M141857</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update, if you opened a TAC case please make sure the bug is customer facing before closing this case. Can you share with us the details of this bug? And the workaround. High 5 for you providing this info.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:53:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081587#M141857</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T04:53:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081588#M141859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep, 5 pints from me too &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; And yes, please do share some more info on the bug. I will also recommend that you move to 1.1.1 as soon as possible (or 1.1.2) as 1.1.0 had a lot of DB issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:58:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081588#M141859</guid>
      <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T04:58:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081589#M141861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bug details:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;﻿Secondary node never becomes standalone after de-registration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The secondary node is de-registered successfully but a "The following deregistered nodes are not currently reachable: &lt;NAME&gt;. Be sure to reset the configuration on these nodes manually, as they may not revert to Standalone on their own." message appears to the administrator.&lt;/NAME&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Workaround&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Log in to the administrator user interface with internal Cisco ISE administrator credentials when de-registering a node. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually we had two accounts in web gui, nodes were registered using one account and during upgrade, i used different account , which triggered this bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081589#M141861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kashish_Patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T05:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081590#M141862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Kashish for the helpful info....just out of curiosity do you know if you use and AD mapped account will trigger the same bug. I am planning for an upgrade from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2 and we have mapped AD accounts to the SuperAdmin role. I am curious if TAC was able to shed some light on this scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for this very helpful info!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081590#M141862</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T05:03:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081591#M141863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure about AD mapped admin accounts. We were using local accounts on ISE Web GUI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kashish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081591#M141863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kashish_Patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T05:07:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ise node not becoming standalone after deregistration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081592#M141864</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No problem, I will circle back and update once I can verify this in the lab. In the meantime can you mark Neno's first post as the solution so this topic can be marked as resolved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-node-not-becoming-standalone-after-deregistration/m-p/2081592#M141864</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-15T14:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

