<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ise personas and Active directory in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-personas-and-active-directory/m-p/1951301#M174127</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The primary admin node and the policy service nodes. All nodes join to AD, but when you create groups in AD and build your polices that is done from the primary admin node, the PSN nodes are responsible for enforcing these policies. This is my personal opinion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-31T16:18:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ise personas and Active directory</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-personas-and-active-directory/m-p/1951300#M174093</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello everybody ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just a question...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which persona needs more bandwidth with Active Directory?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Supposing I have&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; admin/monitor ----------firewall ----------- policy service&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on wich side should I place AD ? (cause firewall limits bandwidth?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you in advance for your response&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-personas-and-active-directory/m-p/1951300#M174093</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuliano Gerardi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T02:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ise personas and Active directory</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-personas-and-active-directory/m-p/1951301#M174127</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The primary admin node and the policy service nodes. All nodes join to AD, but when you create groups in AD and build your polices that is done from the primary admin node, the PSN nodes are responsible for enforcing these policies. This is my personal opinion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-personas-and-active-directory/m-p/1951301#M174127</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T16:18:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

