<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WLC fallback in case of ISE Radius node down in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181656#M176818</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Anyone know if is possible (even in roadmap) assuring a fallback solution for wireless users in case of loosing ISE nodes (same like &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;authentication event server dead action authorize for wired users in switches)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 03:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Valeriu Filipescu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T03:09:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLC fallback in case of ISE Radius node down</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181656#M176818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Anyone know if is possible (even in roadmap) assuring a fallback solution for wireless users in case of loosing ISE nodes (same like &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;authentication event server dead action authorize for wired users in switches)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 03:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181656#M176818</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valeriu Filipescu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T03:09:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WLC fallback in case of ISE Radius node down</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181657#M176860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Valeriu,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was also searching for this solution but not able to find anything. So We have just created one more SSID &amp;amp; WLAN without Radius authentication. If ISE down or fails we just connect to this SSID and get connected to Network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chandrashekhar More&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181657#M176860</guid>
      <dc:creator>shekharmore003</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-04T16:17:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WLC fallback in case of ISE Radius node down</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181658#M176989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's an ideea thanks for your post - I looking for an automated solution, if is posible transparent for end users!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway thanks agai for your post!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/wlc-fallback-in-case-of-ise-radius-node-down/m-p/2181658#M176989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valeriu Filipescu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-06T08:35:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

