<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083340#M219886</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp; Imran,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is a big change about how to configure ISE and ACS 4.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no direct migration from 4.2 to ISE, you need to migrate from 4.2 to 5.x then migrate from 5.x to ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the link of the devices that&amp;nbsp; supporte by Cisco ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manjeets</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-04T09:07:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083334#M219880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are a Small company with 400-Users and currently we are using ACS 4.2&amp;nbsp; at our company.&amp;nbsp; we want to upgrade and use Cisco ISE Appliance instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I want to know is there any major changes in configurtaion between&amp;nbsp; ACS 4.2 and the ISE Latest Verison..............? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any Hardware (Switch or Cisco AP ) compatibility issues with using Cisco ISE.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (we are currently using Cisco Cat 3550 and Cisco Aironet 2600 APs&amp;nbsp; with the existing ACS4.2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What ISE Series &amp;amp; what Soft version are the latest so i can order ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 03:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083334#M219880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Imran Ahmad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T03:01:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083335#M219881</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Salam Imran,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes there is a big change about how to configure ISE and ACS 4.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no direct migration from 4.2 to ISE, you need to migrate from 4.2 to 5.x then migrate from 5.x to ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/migration_guide/ise_mig_undst_tool.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/migration_guide/ise_mig_undst_tool.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It worths to mention that migraiton from 4.x to 5.x ACS version does not migrate all config. It migrates some of them (usernames, identity groups, devices, device groups..etc) but the policies are not necessarily migrated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check what is being migrated on this link:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.1/user/guide/migrate.html#wp1057975"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.1/user/guide/migrate.html#wp1057975&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amjad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: blue;"&gt;Rating useful replies is more useful than saying &lt;SPAN style="color: green;"&gt; "&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083335#M219881</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amjad Abdullah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-28T08:25:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083336#M219882</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be running atleast &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;v12.2(44)SE &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;on the switches and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;7.2.103.0 on the WLC.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Check this compability list: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083336#M219882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip Vilhelmsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-28T09:36:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083337#M219883</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Amjad and Philip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One question, We currently have Cisco Aironet Access-Point in our network.&amp;nbsp; is it a need to have WLC for ISE Deployment,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; or the Aironet APs can work with ISE ??&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; please advice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AS it is stated on Cisco website that ISE does not have TACACS+ functionality,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then for device-management purposes companies should use ACS&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and for other AAA/NAC... services should use ISE ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My quesiton is both products should be used for having multiple services&amp;nbsp; TACACS+ &amp;amp; Radius ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 06:34:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083337#M219883</guid>
      <dc:creator>Imran Ahmad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T06:34:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083338#M219884</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can not use autonomus accesspoints with ISE, only lightweight (using WLC).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second question someone else have to answer. I just learned this week that admin access to devices is not yet fully implemented with ISE so we have to use our old ACS for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083338#M219884</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip Vilhelmsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-31T14:23:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083339#M219885</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my company we use both ACS and ISE, well we had ACS originally but we have to keep it for Autonomous APs and TACACS+, cisco said they will be adding TACACS+ to ISE but that would be in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083339#M219885</guid>
      <dc:creator>edondurguti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-06T18:16:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083340#M219886</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp; Imran,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is a big change about how to configure ISE and ACS 4.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no direct migration from 4.2 to ISE, you need to migrate from 4.2 to 5.x then migrate from 5.x to ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the link of the devices that&amp;nbsp; supporte by Cisco ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083340#M219886</guid>
      <dc:creator>manjeets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T09:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083341#M219888</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basic funtion of ACS is for AAA funtion. ISE is a combination of ACS and NAC&amp;nbsp; with advanced features&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to migrate from ACS to ISE Cisco ISE&amp;nbsp; supports data migration from Cisco Secure ACS 5.1 and 5.2 using the Cisco Secure&amp;nbsp; ACS-ISE 1.0.4 Migration Tool&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The hardware for the Cisco ISE is the same as&amp;nbsp; the hardware for the Cisco 1121 Secure Access Control System (ACS). The ISE also&amp;nbsp; supports VMware&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Secure ACS capabilities are available in the Base&amp;nbsp; software version of the Identity Services Engine. Cisco is offering a 50%&amp;nbsp; discount on the Base migration SKUs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Latest version Of software for ISE is&amp;nbsp; 1.1.3 , 1.1.3 does not support TACACS+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and minimum recquirement for WLC and&amp;nbsp; switch models refer the following links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns170/ns896/ns1051/product_bulletin_c25-712066.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns170/ns896/ns1051/product_bulletin_c25-712066.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns170/ns896/ns1051/trustsec_matrix.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns170/ns896/ns1051/trustsec_matrix.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 01:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083341#M219888</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venkatesh Attuluri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-05T01:02:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083342#M219890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Imran,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your first question:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have Cisco Aironet Access-Point in our network.&amp;nbsp; is it a&amp;nbsp; need to have WLC for ISE Deployment,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; or the Aironet APs can work with&amp;nbsp; ISE ?? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Answer is YEs, you need to have a WLC for the ISE deployment , it is recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your second question:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Till now, ISE does not have a support for TACACS+ functionality, so&amp;nbsp; you can use ACS in your network for that purpose but rest of the network should be managed by ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 00:31:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2083342#M219890</guid>
      <dc:creator>harvisin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-22T00:31:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

