<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Marvin, very useful in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058161#M23518</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Marvin, very useful slide!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steve Sewa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-15T18:45:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Distributed Deployment with Dedicated SXP servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058159#M23516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In an ISE deployment with all dedicated nodes, does Cisco recommend using redundant SXP servers? &amp;nbsp;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(2) Admin nodes (primary/secondary)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(2) MnT nodes (primary/secondary)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(2) PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(2) SXP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058159#M23516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Sewa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T07:32:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It depends how heavily loaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058160#M23517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends how heavily loaded your PSNs are and what platform you are using. (SXP is a service running on a PSN.) Of course if you aren't doing Trustsec (SGTs, SGACL etc.), then the question is moot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is a slide specific to SXP scaling in Craig Hyps' Cisco Live presentation "BRKSEC-3699 - Designing ISE for Scale and High Availability (2017 Melbourne)".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can see it here (slide #145):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=94625&amp;amp;backBtn=true&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058160#M23517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-15T12:07:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Marvin, very useful</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058161#M23518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Marvin, very useful slide!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-with-dedicated-sxp-servers/m-p/3058161#M23518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Sewa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-15T18:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

