<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic dot1x port-control force-unauthorized in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-port-control-force-unauthorized/m-p/3026137#M23889</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;My understanding of the above command is the following -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;force-unauthorized—causes the port to remain in the unauthorized state, ignoring all attempts by&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;the client to authenticate. The switch cannot provide authentication services to the client through the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;port&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In what situation/s has anyone used the above command? Does this not essentially mean "nothing can use that port?" &amp;nbsp;Trying to understand why not just have&amp;nbsp;dot1x port-control auto configured and allow end device to pass/fail authentication.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T07:28:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>dot1x port-control force-unauthorized</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-port-control-force-unauthorized/m-p/3026137#M23889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My understanding of the above command is the following -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;force-unauthorized—causes the port to remain in the unauthorized state, ignoring all attempts by&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;the client to authenticate. The switch cannot provide authentication services to the client through the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;port&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In what situation/s has anyone used the above command? Does this not essentially mean "nothing can use that port?" &amp;nbsp;Trying to understand why not just have&amp;nbsp;dot1x port-control auto configured and allow end device to pass/fail authentication.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-port-control-force-unauthorized/m-p/3026137#M23889</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T07:28:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

