<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yes. You can have a hybrid in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077623#M23985</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. You can have a hybrid deployment of vm and physical appliances. I have deployments with this mix and have not had any problems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Govindan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-14T22:39:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE VM and ISE physical appliance in distributed deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077622#M23984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone tried deploying ISE 2.1 on a virtual appliance and ISE 2.1 on a physical appliance in a distributed deployment?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wondering if we can join a node running on VMware to a physical appliance node deployment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cannot find any documentation around its feasibility&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077622#M23984</guid>
      <dc:creator>abukuru95</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T07:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes. You can have a hybrid</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077623#M23985</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. You can have a hybrid deployment of vm and physical appliances. I have deployments with this mix and have not had any problems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077623#M23985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul Govindan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-14T22:39:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As Rahul said, it works fine</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077624#M23986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As Rahul said, it works fine and is fully supported by Cisco.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just make sure that the CPU, memory and disk specifications of your VM meet or exceed the physical appliance's so that you don't compromise your scalability.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 03:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077624#M23986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-15T03:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for your feedback!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077625#M23987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/m-p/3077625#M23987</guid>
      <dc:creator>abukuru95</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-15T10:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

