<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE Distributed Deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment/m-p/3022861#M24380</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are planning an ISE installation in our organization and wanted to check if we can have a three node ISE setup running various personas as listed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Location - DC&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node 1 - Admin Primary/Monitoring Primary&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node 2 - PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Location - DR&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node 3 - Admin Secondary/Monitoring Secondary/PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aniketalashe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T07:22:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Distributed Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment/m-p/3022861#M24380</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are planning an ISE installation in our organization and wanted to check if we can have a three node ISE setup running various personas as listed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Location - DC&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node 1 - Admin Primary/Monitoring Primary&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node 2 - PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Location - DR&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Node 3 - Admin Secondary/Monitoring Secondary/PSN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment/m-p/3022861#M24380</guid>
      <dc:creator>aniketalashe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T07:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When you have a combined PAN,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment/m-p/3022862#M24381</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you have a combined PAN, PSN and MNT node, it does not support a separate PSN. Look at the reference here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-1/install_guide/b_ise_InstallationGuide21/b_ise_InstallationGuide21_chapter_00.pdf&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The deployment you mentioned is somewhere between Small and Medium deployment. I would recommend adding another PSN (you can have upto 5), so that you have separate PSN and remaining functionality. If price is a criterion, you can have 2 nodes doing all personas -&amp;nbsp; which gives you the same supported user count as Medium deployment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment/m-p/3022862#M24381</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul Govindan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-19T13:39:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

