<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3684827#M25268</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a WS-C2960CX-8PC-L&amp;nbsp; running&amp;nbsp; IOS 15.2(3)E2 with dot1.x, and MAB authentication schema enabled.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Everything works fine for what concerns authentication and authorization while the accounting does have issues.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Differently, than other Cisco switches, we have in production (2960-X and 3560 running different flavors of IOS, typically C3560-IPBASEK9-M Version 12.2(55)SE5), that 2960CX are unable to send back a correct RADIUS accounting message.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem lies, in fact, the RADIUS server is sending an accept message that contains a CLASS attribute (25), so, according to RADIUS RFC4372/&lt;A target="_blank" name="ref-RFC2865"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;RFC2865, the switch should send back the same CLASS attribute value in accounting message.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We see that class attribute sent back in oldest switches/IOS accounting messages but not in the 2960-CX with IOS 15.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The configuration found under the interfaces are the same, and even the global configs (for the part concerning the AAA ) are equal.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amontefusco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-09T10:47:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3684827#M25268</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a WS-C2960CX-8PC-L&amp;nbsp; running&amp;nbsp; IOS 15.2(3)E2 with dot1.x, and MAB authentication schema enabled.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Everything works fine for what concerns authentication and authorization while the accounting does have issues.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Differently, than other Cisco switches, we have in production (2960-X and 3560 running different flavors of IOS, typically C3560-IPBASEK9-M Version 12.2(55)SE5), that 2960CX are unable to send back a correct RADIUS accounting message.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem lies, in fact, the RADIUS server is sending an accept message that contains a CLASS attribute (25), so, according to RADIUS RFC4372/&lt;A target="_blank" name="ref-RFC2865"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;RFC2865, the switch should send back the same CLASS attribute value in accounting message.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We see that class attribute sent back in oldest switches/IOS accounting messages but not in the 2960-CX with IOS 15.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The configuration found under the interfaces are the same, and even the global configs (for the part concerning the AAA ) are equal.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3684827#M25268</guid>
      <dc:creator>amontefusco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-09T10:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3684902#M25269</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you confirm the following command is present in your config:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;radius-server attribute 25 access-request include&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 12:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3684902#M25269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-09T12:54:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3685027#M25270</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The command you suggest is there:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sh run | i access-request&lt;BR /&gt;radius-server attribute 25 access-request include&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3685027#M25270</guid>
      <dc:creator>amontefusco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-09T15:10:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3685059#M25271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BTW, on the older cat 3560 running on 122-55.SE5, it works irrespective of the presence of that command.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3685059#M25271</guid>
      <dc:creator>amontefusco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-09T15:16:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3685160#M25273</link>
      <description>Did you run a debug on the 2960cx? If so, can you share it please? Or run it and share the output into a text file please.&lt;BR /&gt;Also, are you able to upgrade this switch with the recommended stable version 15.2.4E6 and test again?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 16:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3685160#M25273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-09T16:33:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3687046#M25274</link>
      <description>Addresses redacted.


Aug  9 15:18:15.232: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
Aug  9 15:18:18.192: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up
Aug  9 15:18:19.192: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up
Aug  9 15:18:42.988: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (0019.db2b.fa3f) on Interface Gi0/2 AuditSessionID 0A457A0A0000001901E81AF7
Aug  9 15:18:42.988: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000000):Orig. component type = Invalid
Aug  9 15:18:42.988: RADIUS(00000000): Config NAS IP: 0.0.0.0
Aug  9 15:18:42.988: RADIUS(00000000): Config NAS IPv6: ::
Aug  9 15:18:42.988: RADIUS(00000000): sending
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS/ENCODE: Best Local IP-Address ************** for Radius-Server ************
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS(00000000): Send Access-Request to ****************:1812 id 1645/10, len 290
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  authenticator 55 C1 3E 36 6B EA D1 9D - 34 9C 68 B9 E8 6C 78 CD
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  User-Name           [1]   14  "000000000000"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  User-Password       [2]   18  *
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Service-Type        [6]   6   Call Check                [10]
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  31  
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   25  "service-type=Call Check"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Framed-MTU          [12]  6   1500                
  
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Called-Station-Id   [30]  19  "000000000000000000"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Calling-Station-Id  [31]  19  "0000000000000000"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18  
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:   A8 1D C1 62 0E 79 0F 2A 21 A7 56 22 3E 4A BC E0          [ by*!V"&amp;gt;J]
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  EAP-Key-Name        [102] 2   *
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  49  
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43  "audit-session-id=0A457A0A0000001901E81AF7"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  18  
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   12  "method=mab"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Framed-IP-Address   [8]   6   ***************       
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   ******************          
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  26  
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:   cisco-nas-port     [2]   20  "GigabitEthernet0/2"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  NAS-Port            [5]   6   60000                     
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Id         [87]  20  "GigabitEthernet0/2"
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Type       [61]  6   Ethernet                  [15]
Aug  9 15:18:42.992: RADIUS(00000000): Sending a IPv4 Radius Packet
Aug  9 15:18:42.995: RADIUS(00000000): Started 5 sec timeout
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/10 uuuuuuuuuuu:1812, Access-Accept, len 101
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS:  authenticator D4 F5 64 1E 9A 8B 32 F5 - D2 2E F6 CD E2 AF 63 D4
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS:  Class               [25]  63  
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS:   53 42 52 32 43 4C E5 FC 80 B3 97 D5 F6 EC C7 80 11 80 2A 15 80 26 81 8D 87 E0 80 80 96 86 9F 8D C0 85 F5 AA 9E DA F4 BA C8 8D 86 F5 B5 C5 C7 FB EA A6 D9 B1 C2 D1 A5 9F 80 80 80 80 80          [ SBR2CL*&amp;amp;]
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS:  Message-Authenticato[80]  18  
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS:   55 06 7B CC 9C CC 57 BE 51 E4 04 D5 EA B6 44 17             [ U{WQD]
Aug  9 15:18:43.027: RADIUS(00000000): Received from id 1645/10
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000000):Orig. component type = Invalid
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS(00000000): Config NAS IP: 0.0.0.0
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS(00000000): Config NAS IPv6: ::
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS(00000000): sending
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS/ENCODE: Best Local IP-Address xxxxxxxxxx for Radius-Server xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS(00000000): Send Accounting-Request to vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:1813 id 1646/21, len 237
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:  authenticator 42 38 21 6B 58 90 F7 F1 - E7 1F 10 30 6F 86 FF CA
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:  Framed-IP-Address   [8]   6   10.x.y.z             
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:  User-Name           [1]   14  "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  49  
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43  "audit-session-id=0A457A0A0000001901E81AF7"
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  18  
Aug  9 15:18:44.061: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   12  "method=mab"
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Called-Station-Id   [30]  19  "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Calling-Station-Id  [31]  19  "*******************"
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   10.a.b.c              
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Vendor, Cisco       [26]  26  
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:   cisco-nas-port     [2]   20  "GigabitEthernet0/2"
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  NAS-Port            [5]   6   60000                     
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Id         [87]  20  "GigabitEthernet0/2"
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  NAS-Port-Type       [61]  6   Ethernet                  [15]
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Acct-Session-Id     [44]  10  "0000000F"
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Acct-Status-Type    [40]  6   Start                     [1]
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Event-Timestamp     [55]  6   1533827924                
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS:  Acct-Delay-Time     [41]  6   0                         
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS(00000000): Sending a IPv4 Radius Packet
Aug  9 15:18:44.065: RADIUS(00000000): Started 5 sec timeout
Aug  9 15:18:44.089: RADIUS: Received from id 1646/21 a.b.c.d:1813, Accounting-response, len 20
Aug  9 15:18:44.089: RADIUS:  authenticator EB 1F 1F 96 75 5B F1 1F - 2A 8A 35 07 67 E1 BC 6E</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3687046#M25274</guid>
      <dc:creator>amontefusco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-13T12:44:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2960-CX unable to send back RADIUS Class (25) attribute in accounting messages</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3687119#M25275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Upgrading to 15.2-6-E1 solved the problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-2960-cx-unable-to-send-back-radius-class-25-attribute-in/m-p/3687119#M25275</guid>
      <dc:creator>amontefusco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-13T14:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

